|
Hi,
I'm writing an article about how bitwise operators work. But because bitwise operators are operators that are available in many languages (C#, VB.NET, C, C++ ...), so I don't know which section I should choose for my article.
Any ideas?
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em> ProgramFOX
modified 12-Feb-13 13:52pm.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: I doubt about the section of my article.
I'm not sure what you mean by that, but why not just show examples for each language that you are discussing, and let the reader look up their own reference for any languages you do not support.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by that
I mean that I don't know which section I should choose for my article.
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em> ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
Are you presenting some example code? If so, you choose the language in which you are writing your code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but I write code in C# and VB.NET.
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em> ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
General Programming -> Programming Tips I suppose.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi syed_babu,
I took a look and everything looks OK now, is that the case on your end as well? Please let me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your response. I'm able to see the contents now but not the download links for my code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve. Have a look at it now (you may need to Ctrl+F5). I've updated the feed and it's been pushed into live now. The HTML should be good to go.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks perfect.
Is there anything I can do to avoid this in the future?
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
I just fiddled about with the spacing after the pre tags and changed the " to ' for the first JavaScript entry. After that, it seemed to be okay.
|
|
|
|
|
So you changed some spacing and replaced this valid JavaScript code:
<script src="Scripts/jquery.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
...with this valid JavaScript code:
<script src='Scripts/jquery.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
Gee, I don't see how I could have missed that.
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
I also sacrificed a chicken if that helps any.
|
|
|
|
|
Was it a virgin chicken? And did you also burn incense?
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Wellens wrote: Was it a virgin chicken?
No, I'm pretty sure it was a British Airways chicken.
|
|
|
|
|
That's funny.
By the way, I never thanked you....thank you.
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
Don't mention it. I was glad to help.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems the ratio of views to votes on an article, from limited experience, varies from around 2000/1 to 4000/1, which begs the question. Are we being suckered into believing that thousands of people have read our articles when really they're only read by web crawlers and search robots or do real people read them and then only 1 in a thousand has a definite opinion on what they've read.
My guess is it's somewhere in the middle, perhaps Bob has some thoughts on this?
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect that it weighs heavier towards the web crawlers.
|
|
|
|
|
You may be right, they certainly read faster. I wonder given that we don't want to keep them out but that there are ways to do so whether it's possible to let them in but not to count them, perhaps a Bugs & Sugs entry is needed.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a good idea to me.
|
|
|
|
|
cool that's interesting .
Jibesh V P
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
