|
If you're under FF, I'd recommand CPHog.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion however I stopped using FF, it had too many memory leaks to keep it open for a few hours.
And I'm not fond of adding helper code from another source, IMO if CPHog or anything else improves the CP UX, then CP should incorporate it and offer its functionality to everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
I also switched to Chrome recently for the same reasons. I have to use FF at work though.
I am not sure all CPHog functionalities can be implemented for other browsers. It is a greasemonkey script, so ...
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Thanks for the suggestion however I stopped using FF, it had too many memory leaks to keep it open for a few hours.
Me too after you. Thanks for suggestion.
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone 
|
|
|
|
|
The "View" link goes to the message to which you are replying, but I will see how easy it is to add a link to the original item when posting a new message. Or question. Or discussion. Or whatever it is the current member wishes to do 
[Edit: the link has been added]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified 6-Mar-12 16:30pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It appears as Deleted to me.
Sounds like caching.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Today I found some members posted a question(s) as a new article. Also this one[^] abusing the new submission wizard. So before submission validate the length(of content) to avoid these.
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone
|
|
|
|
|
Look at this article, for example. The code sections look like this. How to fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I deleted my browser files (cookies, temporary internet files, and so on) then came back to Code Project, logged in, closed the browser and opened it again, came back to Code Project (Lounge), the "Profile popups" checkbox was checked, but the popups weren't displaying. After I unchecked it, clicked "Update", then checked it and clicked "Update" again, the popups finally displayed.
IE9/Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
I just repeated these steps and I did see a delay (a few seconds) before the first time I visited a forum before the profiles started displaying. They did appear, though.
What are the chances of you trying again?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried again and was able to reproduce the bug.
Of note is that after I logged out (before I logged back in), I was able to see the popups and the checkbox was checked.
After I logged in, the checkbox was checked but the popups were not displaying. I hovered over one name for about 30 seconds to ensure it wasn't just taking a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
I submitted one article it shows pending status.
Then, I edited the article to change the title.
Now when I enter the article it shows the old title. but when I go to edit the artcile again it shows the new title. After editing if I go the article from the confirmation page t shows status "composing".
On the other hand when I access the article from the home page my article link it still shows the old title and status pending.
I am not sure what exactly the rule here. Can anyone help on this?
FYI: The article is submitted more than 36 hours back and it is not yet published.
Here is the link of the artcile: Clear your concepts before you start Domain Driven Design[^]
Mahmud Hasan
Software Engineer from Bangladesh
modified 5-Mar-12 0:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like your article was posted just before we switched to the new system. On the backend we now store multiple versions of your article to allow readers to view the existing version of an article while you continue to work on new versions. In the old system there was just one working version, so the new system was a little confused.
As these in-between articles get approved the confusion will disappear (if it hasn't already done so)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply. The article is approved and confusion is cleared.
Mahmud Hasan
Software Engineer from Bangladesh
|
|
|
|
|
Hi editor, when I edit my article, it usually does not need approval from others. However, when I make a minor update to my SIMD article[^] today, it needs approval before publishing[^]. Is this a bug?
And also the new edit page does not have the option for me not to make public my update.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Wong Shao Voon,
A version of your article is still live, but with the new submission wizard yes, updates need to be approved before publishing.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Here is why I would suggest to remove this check box from all Questions and Answer post forms:
After many months of reading of many posts and posting in this forum, I did not see a single case when this checking of this check box could be useful.
At the same time, nearly every day there are few misuses of this check box, when members check it and use some HTML formatting which is supposed to be rendered, not quoted, and the option screws up that formatting. I don't really know why those member misused of that option, but this is what I observe. Usually, experts help to fix this by unchecking this check box, most comment that it should not be checked.
As I don't see any use of this option in real practice, I would simply suggest to remove it. After all, not having this option does not prevent any reasonable formatting (in particular, using pre or code tags), and having it is not used properly anyway.
[EDIT]
I would support the opinion of Luc Pattyn who thinks (please see his comment below) that this feature should be removed from forums as well.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 5-Mar-12 12:29pm.
|
|
|
|
|
not just in Q&A, I see no need for it in the forums either.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Thank you for supporting my idea. I only mentioned Question & Answers because I never noticed the same feature software and because my observation were based on this forum only. But if this feature is available and useless elsewhere, it would be the best to remove it.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I find it very useful when editing some HTML in a question or answer, in that it allows one to use copy & paste etc., without reformatting as one types. Removal of this option would not be a good thing, IMHO.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Richard.
That was just a suggestion. And for me it would be a good riddance because I uncheck it from other posts from time to time, never had to check.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
In fairness to SA's original request, pasting is meant to be handled by the pop-up paste dialog that does all the formatting for you (and even tries to guess the language).
I've seen members use this in forums (recently, too), but in QA not so much.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
