|
I want to send SMS messages via SMPP and I want to know if anyone tried it? which SMPP control did you you use? which one you recommend?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Hope this link will help you..
<a href="http://www.ozeki.hu/index.phtml?ow_page_number=142">http://www.ozeki.hu/index.phtml?ow_page_number=142</a>[<a href="http://www.ozeki.hu/index.phtml?ow_page_number=142" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried implementing SMPP Client??
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am new to Cake PHP.
What is the difference between PHP and Cake PHP ?
Please anyone can tell me what is cake php and how to use it ?
And also can any provide me the examples for it.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Cake PHP is a framework for developing and deploying PHP appications.
Its like some other frameworks like Joomla, Symfony. You can find more
information here
http://cakephp.org
|
|
|
|
|
If by chance anyone might know what may be wrong... I tried installing Red Hat Enterprise 5.3 on one of my laptops with an SSD doing a clean install (wipe everything) but even though it goes through the whole installation process, it doesn't boot into Red Hat after the final reboot. It seems to either get stuck rebooting (power cycling) or get stuck in Grub with no option to boot into Red Hat. I installed Ubuntu 11.10 and Fedora 16 on that same set up with no problem (Ubuntu is on another drive but the Fedora installed fine on the SSD).
Right now I'm suspecting the DVD I'm using might have something wrong with it... I tried to make an iso of it to keep a copy on a server and the CRC checks kept failing, although when I tested the disk from the Red Hat prompt (at install time) it said the disk was fine. 
Don't really know what else may be causing this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say its a bad iso, can you re-download it?
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't had a chance to revisit this but I did download some new ISOs to try. Fedora worked fine on the very same set up.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any body that has experience with qt in linux?
and qt in embedded linux?
for choosing qt frame work or developing with linux api without framework
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a question
This is just a subject for discussion
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the place.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
The main header above is "Discussions", not "Quick Answers".
|
|
|
|
|
See my response to OP.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
so why page's name is discussions? and where is discussions place?
|
|
|
|
|
Discussions in this context is more about discussing technical problems/issues and how to solve them. General discussions about "why I think application X is good", or "why product Y sucks" are usually ignored, or taken to the Lounge.
As you may have noticed that, apart from me and Albert, no one has joined in.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Lounge is a place for non-programming discussion.
rule 2 in rules for the Lounge :
- No programming questions. For quick answers to your questions please use Quick Answers, for technical discussions use the programming forums(Discussions)
Please read rules carefully.
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammad Masood Ashrafi wrote: for technical discussions use the programming forums(Discussions)
Look at your question again!
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
I had a short contract job where we used the qt framework in all of our c/c++ development. We didn't actually use the IDE though just the framework. The development was done on the linux commmand line. Was there something you wanted to know about it?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new in linux. and I want to develop a application for embedded devices too.
Do you suggest me to use qt framework ? or to write my one framework with linux api?
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it depends what type of embedded programming you are doing. But I would say I had a pretty positive impression of it. The framework was very comprehensive. It seemed like literally anything you could think of existed in qt. This included even standard objects. For instance there's qstrings, qmakefiles, qxml ect... . I would recommend if you use qt that you use the Qx or QTx version of things because everything in qt is designed to work together it seems like. In general the QT version will tend to be similar or simplified from the standard c/c++ library version of things.
We were doing linux programming for a custom linux based thin client OS and for some of the server software to control the thin clients so if you are doing an embedded linux application it should be a good choice.
|
|
|
|
|
First thank you for your good explanation about qt. but do you have any experience with qt on arm?
modified 28-Nov-11 0:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
No we were using Intel chips but there were plans to move to ARM. I wouldn't think that anything would be different though. QT is designed to be cross platform. Also I think Nokia did a lot of the development of QT for their cell phones and since most cell phones use ARM I'd be suprised if ARM wasn't thoroughly supported.
|
|
|
|
|
Along with the Nokia ownership involved, should be noted the framework is NOT free to be used commercially. Just something worth noting.
|
|
|
|
|
See my addition to the Nokia comment...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
