|
I would say its a bad iso, can you re-download it?
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't had a chance to revisit this but I did download some new ISOs to try. Fedora worked fine on the very same set up.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any body that has experience with qt in linux?
and qt in embedded linux?
for choosing qt frame work or developing with linux api without framework
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have a question
This is just a subject for discussion
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the place.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
The main header above is "Discussions", not "Quick Answers".
|
|
|
|
|
See my response to OP.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
so why page's name is discussions? and where is discussions place?
|
|
|
|
|
Discussions in this context is more about discussing technical problems/issues and how to solve them. General discussions about "why I think application X is good", or "why product Y sucks" are usually ignored, or taken to the Lounge.
As you may have noticed that, apart from me and Albert, no one has joined in.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Lounge is a place for non-programming discussion.
rule 2 in rules for the Lounge :
- No programming questions. For quick answers to your questions please use Quick Answers, for technical discussions use the programming forums(Discussions)
Please read rules carefully.
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammad Masood Ashrafi wrote: for technical discussions use the programming forums(Discussions)
Look at your question again!
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
I had a short contract job where we used the qt framework in all of our c/c++ development. We didn't actually use the IDE though just the framework. The development was done on the linux commmand line. Was there something you wanted to know about it?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm new in linux. and I want to develop a application for embedded devices too.
Do you suggest me to use qt framework ? or to write my one framework with linux api?
thnx
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it depends what type of embedded programming you are doing. But I would say I had a pretty positive impression of it. The framework was very comprehensive. It seemed like literally anything you could think of existed in qt. This included even standard objects. For instance there's qstrings, qmakefiles, qxml ect... . I would recommend if you use qt that you use the Qx or QTx version of things because everything in qt is designed to work together it seems like. In general the QT version will tend to be similar or simplified from the standard c/c++ library version of things.
We were doing linux programming for a custom linux based thin client OS and for some of the server software to control the thin clients so if you are doing an embedded linux application it should be a good choice.
|
|
|
|
|
First thank you for your good explanation about qt. but do you have any experience with qt on arm?
modified 28-Nov-11 0:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
No we were using Intel chips but there were plans to move to ARM. I wouldn't think that anything would be different though. QT is designed to be cross platform. Also I think Nokia did a lot of the development of QT for their cell phones and since most cell phones use ARM I'd be suprised if ARM wasn't thoroughly supported.
|
|
|
|
|
Along with the Nokia ownership involved, should be noted the framework is NOT free to be used commercially. Just something worth noting.
|
|
|
|
|
See my addition to the Nokia comment...
|
|
|
|
|
Qt is very versatile, one of the biggest positives is it's ability to go across multiple platforms. With that said, if it's a commercial application there may be fees to pay to Nokia, go to their website for pricing info (it's not published, you have to request it).
|
|
|
|
|
if you had an option to:
1. create a master page and then use to put the full content of the page...
or:
2. to have a coded page with table but use include to include the navigation menu, top header and footer?
which one you'll prefer and which one you'll recommend?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
The method will be chosen based on your design. But i always prefer to the second method.
Since if all the web pages are exactly not similar, and if you want to customize some pages, second method will be good..
|
|
|
|
|
I use includes with function calls.
file structure might look like...
/index.php
/main_inc.php
/template/header.php
/template/menu.php
/template/footer.php
index.php and most other pages would look like this...
<?php
include(main_inc.php);
footer($pg_name);
?>
main_inc.php. $pg_name is obtained automatically
<?php
session_start()
$pg_name = substr($_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME'],strrpos($_SERVER['SCRIPT_NAME'],"/")+1);
include('/template/header.php');
include('/template/footer.php'
?>
The header file....
<?php
include('menu.php');
pg_init($pg_name);
pg_header(pg_name);
function pg_init($pg_name)
{
}
function pg_header($pg_name)
{
echo "<html>";
echo "<head>";
echo "<title>".$pg_title."</title>";
echo "<script>...</script>";
echo "<style>...</style>";
echo "</head>";
echo "<body>";
pg_menu($pg_name);
}
?>
The menu.pgp page
<?php
function pg_menu($pg_name)
{
}
?>
The footer.php page
<?php
function pg_footer($pg_name)
{
echo "</body>";
echo "</html>";
}
?>
This whole thing could be done without using function calls, but I like the parameter passing and with more thought I can add some security, input checking, page name validation, and more and more...
this is a fairly simple template but very flexible
Chris J
www.redash.org
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to know how can I fix the top panel on my web page just like the top panel of facebook and twitter (where the logo and menu options are)?
Thanks,
Jassim
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way is to use position: fixed in your CSS.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
