C / C++ / MFC

Maximilien11-Aug-11 3:28

11-Aug-11 3:28

people who write code like this should be put on burger-flipping stations...

Me think it worked on VC6 because the compiler was crap and did not comply to standards.

anyway check if that works (it compiles no VS2008 and VS2010):

A::Info A::m_values[] = {&A::a, &A::b};

Watched code never compiles.

ilostmyid211-Aug-11 3:34

11-Aug-11 3:34

thanx 4 ur reply, but what's the difference between these two?
a and b are not static data members to be pointed to. there must exist an instance.
if u mean the offset of them from the beginning of the class instance, we should use offsetof() in such a case which is completely different from this.

Maximilien11-Aug-11 7:49

11-Aug-11 7:49

To be frank, I don't know how to interpret it and what it is supposed to be or to do.

You got a class containing an array of its own member variable addresses ?

ilostmyid2 wrote:
if u mean the offset of them from the beginning of the class instance, we should use offsetof() in such a case which is completely different from this.

I don't mean anything ...

Debugging that code will display something like:

-A::m_values 0x00e77000 struct A::Info * A::m_values {a=0x00000000 } A::Info [2]
-	[0] {a=0x00000000 }	A::Info
+		a	0x00000000	int *
-	[1] {a=0x00000004 }	A::Info
+		a	0x00000004	int *

Where m_values[0] is the offset of the first variable and m_values[1] is the offset of the second variable...

It is quite an ugly piece of code.

Please explain what it is supposed to do .

Watched code never compiles.

Albert Holguin11-Aug-11 9:54

Albert Holguin

11-Aug-11 9:54

I agree with you, don't see the point in having that array for a number of reasons... its static, so it'll only contain two values regardless of the number of instances of A, and those variables are public anyway, so what's the point of accessing them via a static array?

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 0:14

12-Aug-11 0:14

indeed it's not a code of mine or my friend. this a piece of a large project which my friend uses. they have to port the whole project containing the code from vc6 to vs2010. so, i'm not the writer and i don't know what has been the aim. eg. int is my replacement to CButton for simplification. the structure is not changed though.

Maximilien12-Aug-11 0:52

12-Aug-11 0:52

Well, now the code compiles.

Just run it and see if the behaviour changes from VC6 to VS2010 ...

If it does not work as intended, then either try to understand what it is supposed to do or re-write it.

Watched code never compiles.

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 7:21

12-Aug-11 7:21

the code compiles only in vc6. in vs2010 i get an error indicating that the array cannot be initialized with &a and &b because they must belong to an instance of A and this is reasonable.
i need to know whether it's a bug of vc6 compiler or the vc6 compiler interprets it and makes in sense in a way that vs2010 doesn't.

Maximilien12-Aug-11 7:47

12-Aug-11 7:47

My first answer fixed the compilation error.

In my opinion, this code is crap and should be rewritten/replaced with good meaningful code.

Check to see in real life ( in your actual code) if that still works (run) and it is doing what it is supposed to do.

Since I really don't know what this code is supposed to do (do you even know what it is supposed to to ?); I cannot help you more.

Good luck with that.

Max.

Watched code never compiles.

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 7:59

12-Aug-11 7:59

as i mentioned b4, i myself don't know what the code is supposed to do too. i just see that vc6 can realize it and guess the writer has written the code in the way it understand. i just need to know what does the code do so that i may port it to vs2010 to do the same behavior. that's all.

MicroVirus12-Aug-11 8:31

MicroVirus

12-Aug-11 8:31

ilostmyid2 wrote:
i myself don't know what the code is supposed to do too

ilostmyid2 wrote:
i just need to know what does the code do

Interesting...
So you already know what you have to do; you said it yourself: understand the code.

Or, make said modification that allows the code to compile, and it'll probably work exactly like it did in VC6.

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 13:39

12-Aug-11 13:39

i created this topic for this, to get help to understand what does the code do!

MicroVirus12-Aug-11 4:36

MicroVirus

12-Aug-11 4:36

From the discussions, it looks like the code is attempting to select 'the same' button (int in the modified example) from every instance of class A, using an index and the Info array.
So, as a way of selecting the first or the second button on each instance of A and working with that.

C++

int whichButton = 1; // or 2
A* arrayOfA = ... // some value

for (int i = 0; i < numOfAs; i++)
{
  CButton& button = arrayOfA[i].*(A::m_values[whichButton]);
  ... // do things with button
}

Or something like that. It's probably a good idea to find out what the code does with this. You should search for all references to A::m_values and find out what exactly it's for.
Then, think of a proper way of implementing that, or verify that it still works and keep it.

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 18:22

12-Aug-11 18:22

let's continue with a completed code. i wonder that it really works and it's not going to be a mistake or bug of the compiler:

C++

#include "StdAfx.h"

using namespace std;

class A
{
public:
	struct Info
	{
		int A::*a;
	};
	int a, b;
	static Info m_values[];

	void f();
};

A::Info A::m_values[] = {&a, &b};

void A::f()
{
	int a = this->*(m_values[0].a);
	int b = this->*(m_values[1].a);
	cout << "m_values: " << a << ", " << b << endl;
}

void f()
{
	A a1, a2;
	a1.a = 10;
	a1.b = 11;
	a2.a = 20;
	a2.b = 21;
	a1.f();
	a2.f();
}

the output is:
m_values: 10, 11
m_values: 20, 21
so how does vc6 implements this and what's the equivalent code in vs2010?
thx

ilostmyid212-Aug-11 18:30