|
Finally, a sensible suggestion
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Add that to the enhancement list. Instead of 'servers are busy' how about 'hamsters are eating bacon'?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
Should there maybe be a rationale requested once someone tries to downvote questions from the same user consecutively? ..let's say if a user goes and downvotes 2 or 3 answers from me back to back, then on the third try, have it ask why and show his rationale.
I seem to attract stalking univoters from time-to-time, latest doesn't have much impact (-2), but the variety of subjects that he's downvoting (C++, Qt, and MFC) and the time between downvotes (2 minutes between each) lead me to believe its the same person. Also, the 3 posts downvoted are the last three things I had answered, so they're right next to one another if you look at my Q&A answers (reinforcing the theory that someone just looked at that list and downvoted).
...Or maybe we should allow users to block others from being able to see where we've posted so that this irrational behavior is not as easy.
|
|
|
|
|
Join the club, I often get runs of 1's.
(to be fair, sometimes deservedly so).
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but why not control the runs... I mean, I don't mind if its deserved... but for people to do it out of spite is just foolish.
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: why not control the runs
What? Stuff a cork up your bottom. That should help stem the flow.
|
|
|
|
|
 different kind of runs... but i keep a cork within arms reach at all times anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: i keep a cork within arms reach at all times anyway
Me too. It's stuck into a bottle of whisky. 
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
There are two reasons for this happening:
0. You are being a twit.
1. The voter is being a twit.
At the end of the day your rep isn't hurt by one or two people troll voting, a member is limited on their ability to down-vote, but if YOU start to iss poff the majority, see FB, then you'll get flame-grilled.
I try not to vote down unless it is abusive - then I'll vote remove - or really stupid.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
I like your list numberingindexing, definitely a sign you may have programmed a bit too long... 
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you have a bad case of the ones. I wecommend incweasing youw daiwy intake of fibew.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
modified on Friday, June 10, 2011 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, no, Didn't you read his post? He's definitely got a case of the twos.
|
|
|
|
|
I got in trouble here the last time I commented on someone complaining about 1 votes.
All I can say is get used to it...really. We all get the case of the runny 1 votes. It happens. It is usually caused by coming in contact with Troll feces.
There really isn't anything that can be done about it. If it becomes a daily issue then call a doctor and drink plenty of water.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: There really isn't anything that can be done about it.
Only because someone chose not to do anything about it... the site's tracking enough information already to see if someone is downvoting the same person. Its not exactly technically impossible.
...but I'll live with it either way...
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe certain members should just go have an icy one and chill.
Jeez, Albert, just forget about these idiots.
|
|
|
|
|
After having solicited the opinion of the CP members it is clear there is a majority in favour of
re-enabling fat_boy.
3.06/5 (12 votes)[^]
2.54/5 (45 votes)[^]
Clearly, as offensive as he can be to some, he obviously provides sufficient amusement and interest to the majority.
Now, knowing the administrators of CP to be a democratic bunch they should listen to the majority voice and bring fat_boy back.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, on condition he finds another subject to amuse us with and shuts up about anything to do with the Earth's climate, or scientific opinions thereon.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
And doesn't talk about himself in the 3rd person!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
And doesn't talk about "models" unless he means these[^]
|
|
|
|
|
But look at the votes, you are in a minority. 
“Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science.”
Martin Keeley, geology scientist
|
|
|
|
|
FAT_BOY wrote: you are in a minority.
Indeed I am, it looks like the community would rather you were consigned to obscurity.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
You're down to meager 2.51 in SB2, 2.37 in the lounge, and 1.96 here. At this point I'd say even if your old account is reinstated the voting counts as a ban on your posting controversial subjects in the lounge. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did the same and all seems fine ... McAfee false alert?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
