|
thanks, works fine again.
Wonder why this suddenly changed, has been 'fluid' for years now, just one of those things I guess.
Tosch
|
|
|
|
|
Geekness alert:
It's actually been "fixed" for a long time, but the width of the fixed sized has been tuned to fit a 19" screen, so most people never noticed it. Further, because it's not actually, truly, fixed, but rather just a "max width", it looks fluid on anything smaller than fullscreen 19".
What I have done is tightened it up so that it's more of a 17" full screen view rather than 19".
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: t's actually been "fixed" for a long time, but the width of the fixed sized has been tuned to fit a 19" screen, so most people never noticed it. Further, because it's not actually, truly, fixed, but rather just a "max width", it looks fluid on anything smaller than fullscreen 19".
mmmmm, I don't think so. 
Chris Maunder wrote: What I have done is tightened it up so that it's more of a 17" full screen view rather than 19".
Ok, that explains it. 
|
|
|
|
|
I recently noticed it is possible to edit the title of an article in your bookmarks (or rather edit the title of your bookmark). That can be pretty handy at times, but it does not do much good since the bookmark groups prevent me from really finding what I want (original titles are usually fine)...
I have 5 pages of bookmarks and I just had to find an article about binding in the 'Database' group in my bookmarks. I have some articles on Design Patters in 'Programming Tips' (while I also have 'Design and Architecture' and 'Uncategorised Tips and Tricks'). I even have an article on an ErrorProvider for WinForms under the header 'C/C++' 
My point is that I have to go through 5 pages of bookmarks to find a specific title and ignore the groups. If we could put bookmarks in our own groups then that would be pretty awesome 
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
Naerling wrote: If we could put bookmarks in our own groups then that would be pretty awesome
I have always thought this was a great idea.
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
This article has a vote of 2, but no messages in the bottom forum which say "my vote of 2".
|
|
|
|
|
It could be that the vote was applied, and then the poster deleted the message. I assume that wouldn't wipe out the vote. Fortunately the author should have received an email with details of who applied the vote and why they did it.
|
|
|
|
|
If a message is removed via "vote to remove", the vote will be removed. I am not sure if the same applies to a message that is deleted by the OP, but I would guess so and that's the way it should do.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting the message isn't transactionalised with casting a vote, so if we had a database slowdown (eg during backups) there's a chance the vote went through but the comment didn't.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internally, yes, and we were planning to but then the cost and hassle of leasing an IPv6 line from the hosting centre meant we decided we'd wait until more than 5 people in the world would visit.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Somehow I think that if you turned it on tomorrow you'd get more than 5 visitors. You would probably get 5 volunteers to test IVP6.codeproject.com just from the troublemakers in the lounge if I echoed this post there. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I know
I really wanted to but there was just too much going on to add that to the number of spinning plates we're currently balancing.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] post is not kid sister friendly, please move it to soapbox.
|
|
|
|
|
Your link is busted. Please use the link address below the post to get a permanent URL.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, as Dan says your link just goes to the first page in the Lounge.
|
|
|
|
|
The message has been moved to soapbox already. Link[^]. Admins are fast.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but had you used the perma-link it would have worked irrespective of the forum it got moved to.
|
|
|
|
|
I had used the perma-link but it did not work.
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd time you did, your first post was not a perma-link (just a forum link that's browser, time, and session dependent)
|
|
|
|
|
What's this perma-link thingy you speak of? 
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Sarcasm? 
|
|
|
|
|
Who me? Nah...can't be. 
--
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I remember, I clicked the "Link" link in that post and once it loaded fully, I copied the address in the browser URL bar and pasted it in my first post. If that did not make it a perma-link, then I guess there might be some issue with the site or connection at that time; or it might be my fault. Anyways, the thread has been moved and my request has been answered.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
