|
Got a couple 'service unavailable' error messages.
"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." Einstein
"Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example." Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
probably a site update being rolled out. I noticed a message from Elina further down said something about updates.
|
|
|
|
|
We were running some heavy processes on our servers.
Should be all good now
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Elina Blank wrote: heavy
Hope you carried out a manual handling assessment then! Running around with heavy things on such a small area isn't very safe you know!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
It seems to me that I'm being awarded reputation points twice for each file attached to an article that I download. For example, from my reputation history:
| 4 May 2011 11:21 AM | Download source or demo file | Organiser | Object Associated File | 2 | | 4 May 2011 11:21 AM | Download source or demo file | Organiser | Object Associated File | 2 | | 4 May 2011 11:20 AM | Vote article up | Organiser | Article Write your own Debugger to handle Breakpoints | 1 |
I rated the article[^], and then downloaded the single source file associated with it. And yet there are two entries awarding me points. Same thing for other articles, when I downloaded 2 files I get four points entries, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - we'll look into this and see what's happening.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can it be the case that you downloaded the same file more than once?
(I just tried it myself, and when i download a file once, i get points once,
but when I am downloading the same file again, I get another 2 points)
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible that the cause is related to that somehow. I certainly don't download the same file twice, but perhaps when I right-click the link to the file, and select "Save Link As" (Firefox 4) then two HTTP GET/HEAD requests are sent for some reason. The FlashGot Firefox add-on is also installed, and perhaps that is interfering in some way.
In any case, if you don't feel this is a problem then please disregard my post
modified on Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I asked because I wanted to know, what is the reason for the problem.
The case you described is interesting, and it may be the reason for 2
requests at the same time. But I think, it is fixed already and
will be deployed to live soon. We will also take care of existing duplicate entries.
And thank you for the reporting.
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Cool, I'm already looking forward to the drop in my points 
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is an absurd request.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, it is an extremely disrespectful gesture and is not in keeping with the site ethos.
|
|
|
|
|
But they didn't violate any rules by doing so. There's no reason to disable the account. No, I don't think it should have happened, but it's not like they voted and then taunted the OP. It could also have been a "That really sucks" kind of vote, referring to Ray's passing instead of the presence of the post itself.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I see it as breaking the 'no abusive conduct' rule at the top of the Lounge. An unlikely to be granted request, yes, but not an absurd one.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not "abusive conduct".
"Abusive conduct" would be as I described earlier, or 1-voting a number someone's posts because you just feel like it, or posting spam on the site. A single one vote does not qualify as "abusive conduct".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: This is an absurd request.
I agree.
It may have been good if that post had no votes at all. But since we cannot have vote-disabled threads, people should be able to vote whatever they want to.
|
|
|
|
|
It is an all-5 post at the moment. 
Either someone changed their vote or Chris removed the down vote.
Either way, what's the big deal? The OP does not care, and nothing's affected. I did not vote and personally I think it's kinda weird that dozens of people voted that a 5. That post should not have been voted on, voting on it (whether 1 or 5) is disrespectful in my opinion. But then it's my opinion!
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: It is an all-5 post at the moment.
Then my post had the desired effect.
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Either way, what's the big deal?
For some reason that thread affected me more than it normally would have yesterday.
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: But then it's my opinion!
And an opinion we didn't ask for, so bugger off! 
|
|
|
|
|
PompeyBoy3 wrote: , so bugger off!
Thats abusive conduct! Quick call the admins, delete the account, shove a red hot poker up his hoop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: or Chris removed the down vote
Not me, and not something I do unless it's from an account that has gone on a malcious voting spree.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
Not me, and not something I do unless it's from an account that has
gone on a malcious voting spree.
Good to know, Chris. I was almost sure you would not do that but I kinda put that as a just-in-case safety net!
|
|
|
|
|
After i submit the solution for the first time, that answer is displaying in 50% of answer area. Its not occupying full answer area. if i refresh the page its displaying correctly.
And it will be good if you increase the answer preview box width to answer's textbox width. 
A person might be able to play without being creative, but he sure can't be creative without playing.
|
|
|
|
|
This should be a little better now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
