|
CPallini wrote: It isn't elegant
true.
CPallini wrote: nor optimal
true.
CPallini wrote: not wrong
false. see my reply to OP.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
See my reply[^].
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
On most 32 bit systems bit 1 and 2 are not used in an address. This allows the CAS algorithm to test an address and also test a flag (very useful for non blocking linked lists).
However on a 64 bit system those 2 bit are in use.
After doing some googling I have found that AMD64 and IA64 use 48 bits. AMD plans to extend that 52 bits.
So my question is, Am I safe to use bit 1 of a 64 bit address, if so will it be portable?
Waldermort
|
|
|
|
|
What exactly do you want to ask ?
Is it processor architecture ?
Is it C, or C++, or C# ?
Is it Win32 / Win64 ?
Is it about pointers ?
If you (in C/C++/C#) have a BYTE array, then ALL lower bits of an address WILL be used; ohterwise you wouldn't be able to do a bulk read or write from a binary file.
Of course, if you do so, you will earn a lot of additional CPU cycles due to misalignment of addresses to WORD / DWORD boundaries, but as cores are so fast now, it doesn't really matters
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I need information on socket programming and need to develop an application which communicates with each other as server socket and client socket..
Can any one help me out regarding this...?
Thanks
John.
|
|
|
|
|
Google[^] is your friend and has a lot of information. And this[^] is a good lecture as well 
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use VC 6.
Some classes can not be viewed on Class-View, but header files of those invisible classes are all added to project, which can be found on File-View.
If I slightly modify header files of those invisible classes, they appear on Class-View.
If I reopen the project, those classes are still invisible on Class-View.
How to fix the bug?
|
|
|
|
|
not exactly sure what would cause this specifically, but sometimes you get weird behavior if you don't include files properly and/or don't properly use header guards
|
|
|
|
|
I had this problem too , and I solve it in that way : I edit something in header files ( of class who is hidden in Class View ) , then Ctrl + S and they will show up in Class View .
|
|
|
|
|
Delete your .ncb file (or rename it) - VS6 will re-create it.
|
|
|
|
|
If I remember well, deleting the .clw file makes the trick: the IDE builds a new, correct one (anyway, before trying, please do a backup of the original .clw file).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
Close the workspace and Delete *.clw and *.ncb files from your workspace.
After open the project select the classwizard. now it will say class file does not exist and you can select all your *.cpp and *.h files from the list and recreate the clw file.
|
|
|
|
|
Delete VC6 and move on to VC10 everything would be alright.
|
|
|
|
|
hi
i doing project on the hiding the folder in windows OS that should not be visible when click the check show hidden .....
i mean making the folder totally invisible like the folder lock 6.5 will hide ...
i am not getting the idea how they had done ...
help me out from this
thanking you....
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know Folder Lock (any version), but have a look at File System Filder Drivers[^] and File System Filter Driver Tutorial[^], maybe those are pointing at the right direction.
> The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. <
> //TODO: Implement signature here<
|
|
|
|
|
nobody wants an invisible folder on their machine.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you consider storing the backlog in one?
|
|
|
|
|
sorry i did't got it ...
are you asking about the memory map then i stopped doing on that up to reading a single file not for the whole drive ...
now to do the project to hide the file or folder from the user ......
i tried using the CSLID but it just convert the recycle bin icon and many other icon such control panel,N/W like icon and also tried with setting the attrribute of the file and making it to system file.....
|
|
|
|
|
user may want to protect the file or folder which is important to him and to prevent accidental delete
|
|
|
|
|
sarfaraznawaz wrote: user may want to protect the file or folder which is important to him and to prevent accidental delete
Another idea is to work with different user privileges to prevent deletion.
|
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure you will not find any official documentation on such a technique. Consider the implications: not only will such a folder be impossible to backup with standard tools, it will also be left stranded when the parent folder gets deleted.
More importantly: it would be the perfect hiding ground for viruses, since an antivirus program will not find it! Not saying viruses will look for such folders (they wouldn't find it either), but they may create one just for the purpose to hide in it.
I could think of two approaches, but I suspect for the very reasons I've pointed out above, the OS will likely contain security measures to prevent just that.
Maybe there is another solution to the problem you have? If it's a security issue, then maybe all you need is encrypt the files. Write-protecting them would save them from most methods of unwanted accidental change. A checksum could enable you to verify the integrity of the files. And an explicit backup would enable you to restore the files in case they have been tampered with.
|
|
|
|
|
I am able to get a CRC32 from a text string.
Can I reverse it .i.e can I input a number and get the string from CRC?
|
|
|
|
|
No you can't. CRC's (and hash codes in general) reduce some arbitrary-length input to a fixed-length output; you could calculate a CRC of the entire content of your disk. Do you really think the process is reversible? if it were, you could compress any disk to a 32-bit number, so the need for disks would decrease, and disk manufacturers would go belly up.
PS 1: this wasn't really a C/C++ question.
PS 2: bad subject line, it does not mention any keyword that refers to the question's subject.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: you could calculate a CRC of the entire content of your disk. Do you really think the process is reversible?
That's not being very optimistic, now is it?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Some people are making such thorough preparation for rainy days that they aren't enjoying today's sunshine." - William Feather
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)