|
ok..
but still how can i add time out time in webconfig
|
|
|
|
|
You can't. That timeout is for connecting to the database, not executing a command on it. See my other post for more info.
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm, I hate to rain on everyones parade here, but changing the timeout in the connection string doesn't work. That's the timeout for the CONNECTION to the database, not the timeout for executing a command on the database.
You're looking at CommandTimeout[^].
But, like JSOP said, if you've got a long running query like this, you're best option is to try and improve the query's performance first. Having done that, if still too long, run the query async so your code isn't blocked waiting 10 minutes for the query to return. Look at the Begin* methods of the SqlCommand object.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two type of timeout which we can use in asp.net-
SqlCommand.CommandTimeout = timeout limit for your SQL query. Means, how much time a (eg: SELECT, UPDATE) query can take for its execution. If it exceeds SqlCommand.CommandTimeout, then it stops execution. A command timeout error will occur.
SqlConnection.ConnectionTimeout = timeout limit for your connection. Means, how much time your connection object can try to connect. If it exceeds the specified time, it stops connecting. A connection timeout error will occur.
HELLO GUY
|
|
|
|
|
Hi developers
I am here to clear my serious doubt about an issue,that came in between my coding.I made a sticky note software in c#.net and it also has a user registration criteria.So in order to do that,that software asks for the username and organization name in a form,and the end user types his name and other details in the textbox and submits it.When user clicks submit,the form carries out the data to the web (opening in an explorer),and shows the name and other details in the web-page controls and stores it in a database.Actually how to do this?I need a quick solution.Please help me your answers dears!
varun
|
|
|
|
|
varun.g wrote: Actually how to do this?
That is your task. Although it is not exactly clear whether this is a Windows Forms or Web question.
varun.g wrote: I need a quick solution.
Try some research into your problem and come back here when you have a more specific question.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Richard
Thanks for your comments.BTW why don't you see the title "windows application contents available and save online".It clearly tells issue.I need to show the windows application contents in a web page and save that content directly to the web database.I need a wise solution please..
|
|
|
|
|
varun.g wrote: "windows application contents available and save online".It clearly tells issue.
It may be clear to you but it does not explain exactly what problem you are having.
varun.g wrote: I need a wise solution please..
Then you need to do some wise research.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
... varun.g wrote: windows application contents in a web page
...
Perhaps you could write your windows application data to a database that the web site can then use as a datasource.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah thanks mates
Actually i am just aware of having "USING SYSTEM.NET" namespace and "httpwebrequest" keyword.But how to perform it in an application?
|
|
|
|
|
I was given a wsdl file to create a web service client.
When I use VS to load Web Reference, from the wizard screen I can see the three methods. But once I go to project object broswer, I can't see the methods or the data types.
But if I use load Service Reference, I can see everything. however the problem is this way only generates an Interface not a class. Still I can't create use it to create a web service client.
I also tried on VS2003 and VS2005. the result is similar.
Any guru can help ?
|
|
|
|
|
Try using the SvcUtil utility to generate the proxy.
You will get more control over various settings if you use this program.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
My latest tip/trick
|
|
|
|
|
i use a tcpclient to connect to a server it works fine, but when i disconnect the tcpcleint and then again try to connect to
server it gives th exception saying this endpoint is already in use. any idea to solve this. when disconnecting i call the tcpclient.close().
thanx in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm fairly sure you can't reuse it, but I don't recall ever trying.
|
|
|
|
|
thanx for your reply, so is that mean once a tcpclient bound to an endpoint we cannot use that endpoint for another tcpclient even we close the first tcpclient ?
thanx in advance
|
|
|
|
|
Again, I've never tried, I always make a new endpoint.
See my TelnetSocket[^] article for how I use them.
|
|
|
|
|
I think there is a fairly lengthy delay (in the order of minutes) before the same endpoint can be re-used. A quick Google search should find the details for you.
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
I need to navigate to a site in IE, login, and then navigate to the Upload page, populate the File field with a file name, and click the Submit button - all from inside a CE Class.
Anyone know how to do this? I'm not even sure what to Google for this?
Thnks
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
|
|
|
|
|
Explain CE class? Windows CE?
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
I have this scenario - users need to access a portion of the website using a password. In order to get the password they need to fill out some information. What I'd like to do is to deliver the password, such that, they cannot see / print it, but be able to "paste" it into the browser's textbox (with the password attribute), but not be able to paste it into a notepad or non-password protected field - the reason being is that they should get access to the content, but not be able to tell others what the password is. The password needs to be the same (I can't give each user a separate password as the content delivery system isn't mine, but I can know what the access password is for the content). Is there a way to do this?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
You need to maybe think about your design. Why don't you implement a users database that issues different logins to your users, but only in your code behind, where you broker the data from the 3rd party, do you know the password for that connection. You should design a system where that password is protected in your server.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is that the content is not from my system, but from (multiple) third party systems. Basically, my application is the "Authenticating Agent" that captures information about the user (information that the third party system does not capture), and based on the proper receipt of information, my program is suppose to deliver the password for content access to the user in a manner that they can input into the third parties application, without revealing the password to the user (thus insuring that that other users are required to goes through my application to gain access. There is no incentive on the part of the numerous third party content suppliers to modify their system, so I need to layer on top of their interfaces - I'm open to suggestions!
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect your site will have a very short life span. You want people to go through your site to access information on other sites so you can gather information about them. AOL tried this long ago. No one wants to use the web that way and there are other sites and services that do this without the hassle.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot control how and what other controls see on the clipboard. You have to have the password in a format that is usable by the various textboxes on various websites. You can't rewrite those sites to "properly" handle the password pasting. A password is just text, period. There's nothing secure about the clipboard, in any respect. You cannot prevent the user from seeing this password at all.
To get around the clipboard, you'd have to write some kind of component that holds onto the password on the clients machine. This component would then be accessed by the code on the target websites, written to obtain the password from the component. Therein lies another problem. By your own admission, you cannot change these websites, and it doesn't sound like you can impose on them an interface to use on your system for authentication.
This idea has no way of working in a practical manner that won't be abandoned by the very users you're trying to gather data on.
This has already been done by various vendors. Microsoft has one, bundled with a bunch of other services, called Windows Live.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
