|
Earn some organizer points by voting 5s to other people then. Example you could give me a 5 for this suggestion! 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I did that, and I certainly don't feel any better...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, when a Platinum guy votes a 5, he should get at least 5 organizer points. 
|
|
|
|
|
Limits have been relaxed a little. A full solution (no limits for platinum) is being investigated.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like a non-platinum was offended.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Can any one tell me weather my site has bugs or how can i do this...
www.bharatdesi.com
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
There is a CodeProject forum for this kind of thing, and this isn't the one. Try here instead:
Collaboration and Beta Testing[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
iam sorry ... i was asking help weather my site has bugs or not cause when i type in Google i see a ? mark very next to my domain name...
I apologize...
|
|
|
|
|
You have misinterpreted the name of this forum.
It is for reporting bugs on this site, or making suggestions to improve this site.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
|
|
|
|
|
iam sorry ... i was asking help weather my site has bugs or not cause when i type in Google i see a ? mark very next to my domain name...
I apologize...
|
|
|
|
|
We know what you are trying to do.
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve deleted my one answer in Question-Answer forum but after deleted it total no of answer should be correct but it still counting deleted answer to my total no of answer.
The total no of answer is correct on my profile page[91 answer] but not here[92 answer][^]
it display correct value for others but not for me. 
Means when I logout my account and navigate this link it display correct value but when I login back and then navigate it doesn’t display correct value 
I am still in confusion because data coming from same database but displaying different values after login
modified on Friday, January 14, 2011 9:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I see both 91.
I'm not sure about this but it could have something to do with the fact that when you delete a answer it's not really deleted just hidden from everyone except from those with the rights to see it.
Since you are the OP you have the rights to see your own deleted answers.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I see both 91.
I've already mentioned that its display correct number for others but not for me.
Tom Deketelaere wrote: Since you are the OP you have the rights to see your own deleted answers.
Yes! Its shows that it deleted but I can see it and even can Update also.
|
|
|
|
|
Look for the link 'Show Only Publicly Available Posts' at the right bottom of the 'My Answers' page. This toggles with 'Show all Posts'.
'Show Only Publicly Available Posts' -> Shows all the answers that you have made till now (even deleted one)
'Show all Posts' -> Shows only those posts that are visible to others.
Hope these all explain the difference. Thus, no wrong counting.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Hope these all explain the difference
I got solution.
Thanks Sandeep
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I just edited this pending article:
How to Create a Bar Chart using OWC in ASP.NET C#[^]
...and I got no points for it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Not Available!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Might be we don't get points for un-approved articles. If so, Chris needs to confirm this and mention it too, somewhere in FAQs.
|
|
|
|
|
But that's what I was talkiing about a few days ago. Editing is editing, whether the article is approved or not. I still put in the time (15 minutes in this case).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Editing is editing, whether the article is approved or not
Yep, I agree - approved or not, one should get points if edited.
I just hope that 10% cap was not in affect that denied you points. Any idea, how that is taken into consideration?
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: I just hope that 10% cap was not in affect that denied you points. Any idea, how that is taken into consideration?
Who me? 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you follow your reputation score on a per-event basis? 
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Do you follow your reputation score on a per-event basis?
After reputation history in place, I think one can also follow on hourly/daily basis and that would be more than enough to catch issues with rep, if any!
Further, Rep-history is a new thing, and as we know, human beings in general, tend to use new stuff more.
Also, currently, Rep thing is still going on and not stable/full-proof  ... thus, few (including me) surely does check for discrepencies to report. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
