|
Hi!
When I run my project, the application crashes and exception pointer goes to a file called crtexe.c. This is my Call Stack.
65720000()
druidsTech.dll!1009f009()
[Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for druidsTech.dll]
druidsTech.dll!1009f9f1()
> TreasureHunter.exe!mainCRTStartup() Line 403 C
kernel32.dll!761fd0e9()
ntdll.dll!76df19bb()
ntdll.dll!76df198e()
Any of the file names in the call stack is not defined by me. How to solve this crash?
|
|
|
|
|
Use your debugger to locate the problem in your code. Put breakpoints just before the crash occurs and checks if all the variables are correctly set.
|
|
|
|
|
T.RATHA KRISHNAN wrote: Any of the file names in the call stack is not defined by me.
You have one out of three (?) possible problems.
1. You have called an API with illegal parameters.
2. You have corrupted memory which can affect any part of your program.
3. The third party code is causing the problem.
For 1 and 2, use the debugger. For number 3, check if there is a software fix/update.
|
|
|
|
|
For starters it would be nice if you had more symbolic information (to avoid getting frames in the callstack like this: druidsTech.dll!1009f009). Have you got symbols for these files?
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
druidsTech.dll!1009f009()
[Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for druidsTech.dll]
druidsTech.dll!1009f9f1()
It shows that No Symbols [PDB files] Loaded for the dll DruidsTech.dll. If you have all the required PDB files you are call stack is informative.
TreasureHunter.exe!mainCRTStartup()
TreasureHunter is the Binary Unit, mainCRTStartup is call. So, you do have pdb information for TreasureHunter.exe.
The answer is get the PDB files for the Binaries to get more information on call stack/
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, ive searched this forum and google and found many tutorials and dll injector sources but i want to modifie injector to reinject everytime when a specified process reloads itself and changes hes process id.
I tryed for checking the process id like this
if(Pid==Pid)
{
hModule = OpenProcess( PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS, true, Pid );
InjectDll(hModule, DLL_Name);
return 0;
}
But it alwyas crashes the injector ....
|
|
|
|
|
Put some error checking and see if OpenProcess is succeeding.
If not, call GetLastError to get more information on the error.
|
|
|
|
|
well everything works fine i mean the dll injector works fine if i inject the dll only once but if i use if statement to check if pid == pid it will crash injector ... mybe im checking wrongly if the process is running ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
nethravathikg wrote: pan,tilt,zoom controller is what i have got as my final yearproject.. but i am not understanding what i have to do
It looks like something related to a video camera adjustments, but your explaination is very poor. If you don't have any idea about what you are talking about, the right person to ask more details is your teacher!
nethravathikg wrote: i need a hep from any body plz reply to this or any body who have done project on this can give me some details regarding this project to my
email id
Nobody will send you any e-mail and when people post answers here you'll get an automatically generated e-mail that informs you. Posting your e-mail on a public forum is useful only as long as you like to get spammed!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
i m using a property sheet,and use 3 property pages here.
i want at certain condition like BOOL test=FALSE; page 3 will me displayed and when test=TRUE; page 3 will not be display.
please tell me how can i do this.
thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not pretty, but see here.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Man who follows car will be exhausted." - Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
its disable the page on OnInit of Propertysheet,
i want to enable/disable the page 3 with corresponding flag value of page 1.
now what can i do for this.
|
|
|
|
|
Le@rner wrote: now what can i do for this.
You can call EnablePage() from someplace else.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Man who follows car will be exhausted." - Confucius
|
|
|
|
|
How to create Interface in c++? sample code pls?
|
|
|
|
|
There's no real interfaces in C++. However, a class with only pure virtual methods and no variable members is generally considered as an interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a common way to handle such situation?
SomeObject* objects;
omp parallel for
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
int res = RunFunction(objects[i]);
if (res)
return res;
}
Once RunFunction failed stop processing and notify application
Чесноков
|
|
|
|
|
I'm no expert on openMP stuff...
can't you just break ? or simply change the loop value so that next iteration will not continue ?
int res;
SomeObject* objects;
omp parallel for
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
res = RunFunction(objects[i]);
if (res)
i = N;
}
return res;
Max.
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
break and return are no allowed.
I'm looking for the common practices and patterns in that scenario to not to envent something uncommon.
Чесноков
|
|
|
|
|
I'm no OpenMP expert, but isn't this an example of an algorithm that can't be paralleled as it is written. Imagine two threads, so it runs (0,1), then (2,3), but what if the return value of RunFunction(object[2]) says that the loop should stop, we have probably already executed RunFunction(object[3]).
It is not easy to come up with a way that stops a parallel loop with the same result as stopping a sequential loop.
Peter
"Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."
|
|
|
|
|
it needs to prevent further processing in case of the single error even the next some other parallel returned correctly
Чесноков
|
|
|
|
|
Chesnokov Yuriy wrote: it needs to prevent further processing in case of the single error even the next some other parallel returned correctly
That's why you want to do it, now you have to find a way to tell the compiler how to do it in one of the standard ways that it knows how to parallelise. Currently you are telling it that if RunFunction(object[n]) is false then it must not execute RunFunction(object[n+1]), and I don't think any compiler will know how to parallelise that.
Peter
"Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."
|
|
|
|
|
the return value of your code corresponds to the logical OR of all those RunFunction invocations. If RunFunction() has no side-effects, you could use a global flag, and even abort all threads once a true value is encountered. If there are side-effects, your code is strictly sequential and cannot be parallellized; at best you could split RunFunction() in a first half without side-effects (that part can be run in parallel), and a second half that produces the side-effects (that part needs to be executed in strict sequence).
|
|
|
|
|
Is there some API to get list of all sockets opened in my process (opened by 3rd party module) and get some usage statistics? (at least last data send/receive timestamp to detect active connections).
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
