|
Ray Cassick wrote: Can't remember the last lime I was NOT in domain mode around here at the house.
Meanwhile I shudder at the thought of having to pay several hundred dollars more per windows upgrade cycle just for pro level OS licenses. If Win8 allows joining a small domain at the Home Premium level I'll probably set one up, until then it's not worth the expense. Even then, unless I can get a free server 2012(?) license or they add domain controller to WHS I'll probably end up running LDAP on a *nix box. Server class OSes and tools are just too $*#@)$ expensive otherwise.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
If you have current projects that can leverage MS tech then consider something like joining their BizSpark program. Very cheap and gets you a ton of benefits, one of them being access to MSDN subscriptions. The cost at a company level is like $100 a year.
|
|
|
|
|
MSDN isn't licensed for production use so running your home network on it isn't permitted. I'd assume that bizspark has similar restrictions that your cheap licenses are only for work use.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft® BizSpark™ benefits to startups include:
Software.
Get immediate access to current full-featured Microsoft development tools, platform technologies, and production licenses of server products (including Windows Azure Platform) for use in developing and bringing to market innovative and interoperable solutions.
Nope... Look into it...
http://www.bizspark.com/Programs/Pages/BizSpark.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
If your excerpt covers the uses fully, then it's only licensing the software for work related purposes. Unless otherwise specified, home network generally refers to all the computers you, your spouse, and kids use to surf the web and do homework on; not the computers you're using to run a startup/side project. If all the computers you've built using bizspark are for the latter use, my apologies.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Trelawny-Ross wrote: * Ideally, it'll have an some easy way to make periodic backups (tape? CD? external HD? Suggestions?)
An HD is the only reasonable option for consumer backup at this point. Optical disks are far too small and slow. Tape doesn't become reasonable costwise until you're doing at least a dozenish terabytes and even then you'll be puttering around with 400/800GB tapes so it's still got a large annoying factor.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Any Windows PC can act as a file and print server; there's no need to use a Server OS if you don't need the domain controller functions. SQL Server is a resource hog, though, so you'll want to spend your money on lots of RAM and disk storage. Both have become very cheap in recent years, and since performance isn't a major issue for you, you can save a little on the computing hardware and spend more on the storage. I do think $1000 is a better target for you than $500 - that only gets you a low level desktop.
One item I find useful is the plentiful selection of large, cheap external disks available now. A few hundred bucks buy a lot of terabytes of storage these days, and those make nice backup devices.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
How many of us are there, what sort of fields do you work in and where are you based?
It would be interesting to know how thin on the ground we are (then we can ask a higher rate!  )
I have done NDIS nic drivers (3G USB devices and bespoke HW), serial drivers and various filter drivers. I work in Europe, mostly in the UK.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
I don't do drivers full-time but I am one of only two folks in my shop of about 20 software folks who do kernel-level code. We are driven by customer requests, so when we do drivers varies wildly. I haven't done any in over a year, but in the two years before that, I wrote 3.
I think you don't see many here because most "serious" driver writers lurk over on OSR. Given some of the types of programmers I see asking the odd driver question, I don't know if I want to encourage them to write a driver 
Judy
Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss.
Lazarus Long, "Time Enough For Love" by Robert A. Heinlein
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting question, and Judy's reply is also interesting.
I am not a kernel dev person, but since I work for a very small company,
I have to handle a lot of different situations. I mostly do user interface
stuff for our instruments, but twice since 1999 I've had to dip into printer drivers
for our chart recorders/graphic printers. I just use the Microsoft Unidrv stuff
and I find that challenging enough. The documentation from Microsoft is in geological
layers, and the docs I have never seem to quite fit the DDK I have.
Enough! You guys are not interested in this, but maybe someone else is
John
|
|
|
|
|
Ha, thats a good way of saying it. Its massive, but also never gives you a absoloute answer, probably because Microsoft dont know how it works either!
The most problematic though is the ability of Windows to go into strange parts of ite 'envelope' and start acting weird. Much of the challenge if kernel deving is to keeop Windows as close to the center of its possible field of states. We call it a nondeterministic infinite state machine. Its due to its sheer complexity, and hence architectural bugs can arrise easilly, and the fact that HW is so very different from platform to platform nd can have a massive effect on the Way the kernel functions.
Its a tough job, but itf pays well, and is challenging.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
fat_boy wrote: Ha, thats a good way of saying it. Its massive, but also never gives you a absoloute answer, probably because Microsoft dont know how it works either!
The most problematic though is the ability of Windows to go into strange parts of ite 'envelope' and start acting weird. Much of the challenge if kernel deving is to keeop Windows as close to the center of its possible field of states. We call it a nondeterministic infinite state machine. Its due to its sheer complexity, and hence architectural bugs can arrise easilly, and the fact that HW is so very different from platform to platform nd can have a massive effect on the Way the kernel functions.
I like your idea, a nondeterministic infinite state machine!
John
|
|
|
|
|
It was coined by a colleague I worked with a few years back, and so well defined windows it stuck in my mind. Its the complete antithesis of what a computer should be.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
i built a seial programmer to the atmega32 found in this link :
http://ballwell.blogspot.com/2009/08/serial-programmer-for-avr.html
i am trying to test it using ponyprog , but unfortunately when i open the setup interface i get "Test Failed"
i am searching for any error but i cant find
thnx for any help
modified on Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
your link seems incorrect.
|
|
|
|
|
sorry for mistake , i corrected the link
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I skimmed that blog, so I think I understand what you are trying.
There is insufficient information (symptoms) to help you out, anything could be wrong (no power, wrong serial port, bad cable, no target device, ...). Has it ever worked for you?
I'm unfamiliar with ponyprog, I don't know what conditions would lead to "Test Failed" (and what other messages could be generated).
Your best bet could be to post on a specialized forum, is there one for ponyprog? or contact ballwell.
If all that fails, post here again, with tons of information of what you did, what works, what doesn't.
BTW: I regret the little PCB does not offer any LEDs, it is always good to have some immediate indicators.
|
|
|
|
|
please can you explain me in brief wat you are trying to do so i can help you out i have worked little on avr microcontroller building bots....i mean robot 
|
|
|
|
|
Is it like this?
when reading/writing a file, if there are APC's, the reading/writing returns immediately and prematurely, and the APC's
are executed.
|
|
|
|
|
Thats a good question, and not documented that clearly, but it seems (and I havent personally dug into this functionality to that extent) that the calling thread is notified if there is an outstanding IRP on the devobj and can then decide to terminate or not the operarion. This is from the DDK:
"When I/O is synchronous, each I/O operation must wait for the preceding operation to complete before it begins. With the FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT operation, waiting threads are alerted to the delay and can terminate the operation."
All IRPs will be synchronous, each having to complete before the other can start. You will probably get a STATUS_PENDING from ZwWriteFile() for example. Is this what you get?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
Just saw your last post, if you are in user mode why call ZwCreateFile(), surely its easier to call CreateFile() since much of this work will be done for you.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
|
|
|
|
|
i bought a usb to rs232 converter and i tested it using loopback and hyperterminal and it is working
but i can't know the values of logic 1 and logic 0 , is it 0 to 5 volts or what !!
i mean do i need MAX232 to connect it to an AVR micro ?
|
|
|
|
|
RS232C is a standard that specifies different aspects of the serial interface, including voltage levels. Microprocessors don't give those voltages (and don't require the corresponding supply voltages either), so yes you typically need a level converter (MAX232 is a popular possibility).
You should learn to use Google, and look for:
- the RS232C specifications;
- the datasheets for the components you intend to use;
- some relevant articles (CodeProject has at least 3 articles mentioning MAX232).
Warning: if you make a mistake, you're likely to damage one or more of the parts involved. So it is very wise to do first experiments with a part that is easily replaced, such as your USB-to-RS232C cable or a plug-in card in a desktop computer, and NOT with a serial port on the motherboard.
|
|
|
|
|
i understand what u say but i am a bit confused
i think that USB uses voltage levels (0-5v) , how it is supposed to get the levels of RS232 (in the USB to RS232 cable) without external power source
thnx for caring
|
|
|
|
|
While the original RS232 spec called for voltages of around 12 to 18V, modern implementations are almost exclusively 5 volt designs. The USB standard provides for each port to deliver a small amount of 5 volt power to connected devices, which is what makes possible many popular USB devices, including your RS232 converter. The key word is "small" however, and USB does not provide enough power to deliver a serial connection very far.
Driving a cable requires the ability to source and sink a fair amount of current, primarily because the cable "looks like" a capacitor that must be charged and discharged for every change of state. Microprocessors like the AVR are built mainly using CMOS technology, which cannot source or sink much current, so external bipolar circuits are almost always required. Special circuits like the MAX232 require very little input current, and so can be driven by a micro directly, but they can move larger currents on the RS232 side. Depending on what form your AVR takes (bare processor, development board, custom circuitry) you may or may not need this extra buffering. Check the documentation for what you have to work with. If it specifies a serial port without mentioning RS232, you can be fairly sure that you need to provide this extra circuit for the connection to the outside world.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
