For Multilingual Application - C# Discussion Boards

making auto serial number for each build of project

10-Jun-10 1:05

you're welcome.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.

I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).

kasraa000980009-Jun-10 9:47

kasraa00098000

9-Jun-10 9:47

hi all, as I titled i'm going to make serial number or an special uniqe number for my project by every exe that I build of it, is there any way to make it dynamically? especialy in msbuild command?

Re: making auto serial number for each build of project

#realJSOP9-Jun-10 10:02

Re: making auto serial number for each build of project

9-Jun-10 10:02

I found this with google:

http://carso-owen.blogspot.com/2007/02/custom-serial-number-generator-in-c-net.html[^]

.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

Jason Vetter9-Jun-10 10:11

Jason Vetter

9-Jun-10 10:11

System.Guid.NewGuid.ToString.ToUpper

Re: making auto serial number for each build of project

#realJSOP9-Jun-10 23:45

Re: making auto serial number for each build of project

9-Jun-10 23:45

Yeah, I know, but the various parts of the serial may have special meaning. Since the OP didn't specify that, I thought I'd demonstrate that *anyone* can use google.

Tony Richards9-Jun-10 10:44

Tony Richards

9-Jun-10 10:44

Would a unique assembly version number do the job? You can get one using:

[assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.2.*.*")]

See here for how the numbers are generated:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.reflection.assemblyversionattribute.assemblyversionattribute(v=VS.71).aspx[^]

How to build reportviewer using existing dynamic dataset without report wizard

roman_s9-Jun-10 8:24

roman_s

9-Jun-10 8:24

So lets say I have Form1

in Form1 I want to build a reportviewer1 linked to an reportex.rdlc.

I have designed the rdlc and when the code executes it creates the dataset that is returned as dsCount

DataSet dsCount = ConvertDownloadAuditToDataSet(daCountList);

I want reportviewer1 to bind this dsCount to the report.

I know how to build on creating a xsd dataset but when I have an embedded dataset Im not sure how to bind it

For Multilingual Application

Andy Rama9-Jun-10 7:59

Andy Rama

9-Jun-10 7:59

Hi to all,

I want to know,
How to convert => A string of "char" into Text or Bytes information coded using (ISO/IEC 8859-x) character sets according to language used for string of "char" ? Language can be any regional or international.

Thanks & Regards,
Aniket A. Salunkhe

Dimitri Witkowski9-Jun-10 8:50

Dimitri Witkowski

9-Jun-10 8:50

How about:
Encoding.GetEncoding("iso-8859-1").GetBytes("your-string");

Die Energie der Welt ist konstant. Die Entropie der Welt strebt einem Maximum zu.

Andy Rama10-Jun-10 6:07

Andy Rama

10-Jun-10 6:07

Thank you very much for ur help.

I will try it.
I have to use character code tables ISO/IEC 8859-5 to ISO/IEC 8859-15 & few others (from Annex A.2 of 'Specification for Service Information (SI) in DVB systems' http://www.dvb.org/technology/standards/a038r6.tm1217r17.en300468v1.11.1.pdf[^].

Will it work with it?

Is there any way to identify character code table of a given string?

Thanks & Regards,
Aniket A. Salunkhe

Dimitri Witkowski10-Jun-10 6:16

Dimitri Witkowski

10-Jun-10 6:16

Have no idea, whether it work with DVB systems and don't want to read the specification :p
No, there's no built-in mechanism to identify the encoding.
But there are some open-source encoding detectors, here are some examples:
http://code.google.com/p/ude/[^]
http://www.conceptdevelopment.net/Localization/NCharDet/[^]

Die Energie der Welt ist konstant. Die Entropie der Welt strebt einem Maximum zu.

How to return a collection from a method.

Andy Rama10-Jun-10 6:18

Andy Rama

10-Jun-10 6:18

Thanks again.

Chiman19-Jun-10 6:28

Chiman1

9-Jun-10 6:28

public List<string> GetList()
        {
            List<string> list = new List<string>();
            return list;  
        }

But as per msdn we should not expose the generic list.
How to return a list from a method.

2)

Simillarly I have a method which has dictionary as a return type
How to return a dictionary from a method.

3) In my code I have craeted a dictionary as

Dictionary < int , Some Str>

.
Now I need a colletion of keys avaialble in the dictionary.
How to do this.??

Do I need to retrive one by on from dictionary. ??

Luc Pattyn9-Jun-10 6:50

9-Jun-10 6:50

Hi,

1.
there is nothing that prevents you from returning a List (or any other collection) like that.
There may be "good practice" or "OO" reasons not to do so under certain circumstances, but it is perfect C#.

2.
see 1.

3.
if you look through the MSDN documentation, more particularly the properties of Dictionary<Tkey, Tvalue>, you will notice it is all there.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.

I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).

Re: How to return a collection from a method. [modified]

Not Active9-Jun-10 6:57

Not Active

9-Jun-10 6:57

FxCop will recommend using ReadOnlyCollection[^]

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

#realJSOP9-Jun-10 7:43

9-Jun-10 7:43

That seems kind of inefficient. Does that mean there are now two copies of the same data in memory? (Actually, with their crappy sample, the array at the end of the Main() method makes a 3rd copy).

modified on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 1:50 PM

Not Active9-Jun-10 7:47

Not Active

9-Jun-10 7:47

You're not supposed to actually read or use the examples Poke tongue | ;-P

I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt

Luc Pattyn9-Jun-10 8:28

9-Jun-10 8:28

John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Does that mean there are now two copies

No. The way I understand it the ReadOnlyThingy is just a wrapper; it holds a reference to the original collection (and that explains how it tracks the changes to the original collection, see the example), but offers fewer valid operations on that collection. So nothing gets copied.

I haven't used it ever yet, as I see not much point in making the collection read-only, while the items in the collection remain as they were, modifiable at will (except for the silly example that used strings of course).

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.

I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).

DaveyM699-Jun-10 8:59

DaveyM69

9-Jun-10 8:59

I use them quite a lot. Many times I want a collection to be exposed but not have add and remove methods etc as I don't want the collection itself to be modified. I find it very useful!

Dave

If this helped, please vote & accept answer!

Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)

BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)

Luc Pattyn9-Jun-10 9:05

9-Jun-10 9:05

You're probably right, I still have to get used to them...

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.

I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).

carbon_golem9-Jun-10 7:30

carbon_golem

9-Jun-10 7:30

Try using a custom iterator. Passing back a generic list is wasteful in some cases anyway.

public IEnumerable<String> GetStrings(){
     foreach(var str in stringList){
         yield return str;
     }
}

"Simplicity carried to the extreme becomes elegance."
-Jon Franklin

#realJSOP9-Jun-10 7:47

9-Jun-10 7:47

You can do it that way (and IMHO, if the compiler lets you do it, nobody else has the right to complain, coding style guidelines in force not withstanding), but to ease typing, I create a class derived from the desired collection type:

public class ListOfThings : List<Thing>{}

That way, I can pass/return a ListOfThings object instead of having to type all that crap over and over again.

public ListOfThings GetListOfThings() { get; set; }

I can also add custom methods to the class that perform Thing-specific functionality.

Andrew Rissing9-Jun-10 7:55

Andrew Rissing

9-Jun-10 7:55

John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
You can do it that way ...

But you end up actually typing MORE 'things':

ListOfThings
List<thing>

#realJSOP9-Jun-10 8:26

9-Jun-10 8:26

List<thing> - a little shorter
ListOfThings - a little eaiser to read
ThingsList - even shorter and still easier to read - WINNER!