|
Might have to do with the fact that Chrome can resize textboxes on pages where the textbox wasn't meant to be resized.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I'm pretty sure that's why. We definitely didn't design it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
With the World Cup coming in a few days, it could be fun to have a dedicated sport forum.
Watched code never compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
This is a programming site.
If you want to discuss sport use the lounge / soapbox / back room forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: Why?
This is a programming site.
If you want to discuss sport use the lounge / soapbox / back room forums another web site.
Fixed that for you...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I think some of the none sport/football minded CPians will appreciate this too as the lounge will not be clogged with football banter.
|
|
|
|
|
So set up your own group - WorldCup2010 and discuss it at length there. Give the rest of us somewhere to get some peace and quiet from the seemingly interminable waffle is generates...
Did you know:
That by counting the rings on a tree trunk, you can tell how many other trees it has slept with.
|
|
|
|
|
Hear Hear!
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto - nothing bores me more than football and I'm sure there's no shortage of places where other neanderthals like minded people will be wasting their time discussing the World Cup.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Sh*t (with a big S) becomes Sh*t (small s)
|
|
|
|
|
You are shitting me?
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Simple fix: don't swear.
(and no, I'm not being facetious. I'm asking)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Alex Salmond" yeah, should be banned!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I think this has already been raised before, but I'll mention it again in case I'm wrong:
A lot of times, I see that a QA is marked as edited by someone, but when I check the revision history, there is no difference between the original post and the revision.
Here's an example: http://www.codeproject.com/Questions/84985/How-to-send-text-messages-to-a-phone.aspx[^]
Compare the original post to the revision by Smithers-Jones. Marked as a minor edit - true, but the comparator doesn't show any difference.
Not to point fingers at any, but isn't that a cheap way of collecting editor's points?
|
|
|
|
|
We have an open bug that the "minor change" isn't being set correctly. This will be fixed.
Editing can also be moving into a better section or changing tags. However, these should set the minor change to TRUE (which they will. Soon)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Great - I was quite sure I had seen it somewhere...
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Editing can also be moving into a better section or changing tags. However, these should set the minor change to TRUE (which they will. Soon)
But what if you change tags AND provide a significant edit of the content?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I often find myself editing questions that does not change the OP too much, but clarifies in terms of spelling, syntax and grammar, just to make it more easily readable and therefore answerable.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I know, but in this case it literally showed no difference...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that is a horse of a different colour, and if tagged as 'Minor Change' should be highlighted thusly.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure 'minor edits' don't award any reputation points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
