|
"How to get answer to your question?"
"Re:", what kind of subject is that?
|
|
|
|
|
Oops forgot subject. Edited post
|
|
|
|
|
I take it you didn't see rule #6: Do not remove or empty a message if others have replied.
|
|
|
|
|
For those curious, the original question (before the author removed it) was:
o0romeo0o wrote: Currently I have a grid that fills rows a certain color when a certain condition is met (its a Grid from Divelements but similiar to MS)
protected override void DrawRowBackground(Divelements.SandGrid.Rendering.RenderingContext context)
MasterListItem M = this.DataItem as MasterListItem;
if (M.Flags == 1)
{
context.Graphics.FillRectangle(Brushes.LightYellow, this.Bounds);
}
base.DrawRowBackground(context);
How do I specify this to only drawRowBackground on 1 specified column instead of the whole row of columns.?
any example code?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Im playing videos using directshow but when I minimize the form and then bring it back to normal the video seems to disapear. Anyone know why?
Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why, but you might try handling the normalize (and maximize) event and calling show window, or bring to top, or maybe even focus on the video window.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I have developed a windows application in c#. I am using Windows media player to play video files.
for (int i = 0; i < ds.Tables[0].Rows.Count; i++)
{
GlobalClass.Global.videoName = ds.Tables[0].Rows[i]["videoName"].ToString();
wmp.URL = GlobalClass.Global.onlinePath + GlobalClass.Global.videoName;
}
Media player plays the last video file where count ends. i want the player not to play next file until 1st ends.
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks,
Tanzeel
|
|
|
|
|
Prepare windows media player playlist first..,
play all videos using playlist, one by one
Rajesh B --> A Poor Workman Blames His Tools <--
|
|
|
|
|
I've got main application (which listens on some port and accepts connections) with a TcpClient variable in the fields which is used to get connected client.
I run some time consuming BackgroundWorker from that main application which performs some calculations and send data to that connected TcpClient with asynchronous BeginWrite().
DataWrite AsyncCallback is defined in the main application body.
Why BegineWrite() called from BackgroundWorker blocks until all data was sent and DataWrite AsyncCallback finished?
How to solve the problem to send thread results without DataWrite block?
Чесноков
|
|
|
|
|
I would use a thread pool and fire off a thread to perform the DataWrite processing. Configure the thread pool to allow one thread to run at a time (since you can't start a new write while another write is in progress).
Let the thread pool manage that, and tyour background worker will be free to work as intended.
I wrote an article on using a thread pool here:
Multithreading, Delegates, and Custom Events[^]
You should be able to take what's in that article and massage it to fit your own needs.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I was wondering if there is possibility to avoid TCP packet sending thread addition. BeginWrite is asynchronous operation call and should return immediatly.
Чесноков
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ,
Which is the best tool for .net obfuscation ? i found that dotfuscator is good tool for obfuscation. is any disadvantages are there with dotfucator?can i go with this tool.
thanks in advance,
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using Xheo codeveil, and I'm very content with that. As for it being better or worse than any other, I don't know, because I'm not a hacker, so I cannot judge which obfuscation is easier or harder to crack.
But I would be very interested in following this thread and get some pointers from people who knows.
As for obfuscation, this is a very good link:
http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/[^]
It lists a lot of obfuscators, but unfortunately there's no feature comparison...
Good luck
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you're talking about the obfuscator that came with Visual Studio, it's crap and won't prevent reverse engineering.
You actually have to *buy* a product, and there are several on the market. Be aware that only one of them (that I know of) is capable of obfuscating wpf/silverlight code.
Try googling for "obfuscation tool", and you'll get many hits. I've seen them for anywhere from $169 to several thousand dollars, but have never had the opportunity to actually use one.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Dotfuscator sucks.
Phoenix Protector[^] is pretty good and free
As with any obfuscator, it is not actually immune to reverse engineering, it just delays it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beat me to it!
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOW TO ELIMINATE ONE
<br />
<br />
<br />
DataTable dt = dataSet1.Tables["tmpItem_aux"];<br />
DataRow newRow = dt.NewRow();<br />
<br />
newRow["itemcode"] = itemcodeTextBox.Text.ToString();<br />
newRow["itemDesc"] = itemDescTextBox.Text.ToString();<br />
newRow["quantity"] = quantityTextBox.Text.ToString();<br />
newRow["unitPrice"] = unitPriceTextBox.Text.ToString();<br />
newRow["total"] =totalTextBox.Text.ToString();<br />
dt.Rows.Add(newRow);<br />
<br />
<br />
OUTPUT SAMPLE
ITEMCODE ITEMDESC QUANTITY UNITPRICE TOTAL
TEST123 ITEMTEST 1 50 50 --------SAME IN LASTROW
SAMPLE1 ITEMSAMPLE 2 100 200
SAMCODE SAMDESC 3 20 60
TEST123 ITEMTEST 1 50 50 --------SAME IN FIRST ROW
modified on Friday, May 14, 2010 2:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
DON'T SHOUT!
Some of us may have hangovers.
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Some of us mayWe have hangovers.
FTFY
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Not me - don't drink these days! 
I have learnt that you can not make someone love you, all you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.
Apathy Error: Don't bother striking any key.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: days
Only nights 
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
We can't possibly help you because we don't know what the code looks like that called the code you've already posted.
And turn off your CapsLock key.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
