Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event - C# Discussion Boards

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

1-Mar-10 7:34

first you need to check if ~~OnDataChanged~~ DataChanged is not null, then throw event. NullReferenceException is thrown, because there isn't any method subscribed to that event

modified on Monday, March 1, 2010 1:40 PM

Arindam Tewary1-Mar-10 7:51

Arindam Tewary

1-Mar-10 7:51

Thanks Saksida. As per your comment I noticed I have not provided any method which subscribes to the event. Now after I have written a "MyUserControlOne_DataChanged" method and its working nicely. Thank you very much for poiting me the mistake.

Now this is working nicely !

public class DataChangedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
    private String _strArgVal = "";
    public DataChangedEventArgs(String Value)
    {
        _strArgVal = Value;
    }
}
public delegate void DataChangedEventHandler(object sender, DataChangedEventArgs e);
public class MyUserControlOne
{
    String DataString = String.Empty;
    private bool isEventWorking = false;
    public event DataChangedEventHandler DataChanged;
    public MyUserControlOne()
    {
        DataString = "";
        this.DataChanged += new DataChangedEventHandler(MyUserControlOne_DataChanged);
    }

    protected void MyUserControlOne_DataChanged(object sender, DataChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        isEventWorking = true;
    }
    protected virtual void OnDataChanged(DataChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        DataChanged(this, e);
    }
    public String SetData
    {
        set
        {
            if (value != DataString)
            {
                OnDataChanged(new DataChangedEventArgs("Event Fired !!!"));
            } DataString = value;
        }
    }
    public bool EventWorking
    {
        get { return isEventWorking; }
    }
}

calling code:

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    MyUserControlOne o = new MyUserControlOne();
    o.SetData = "ABC";
    o.SetData = "ABCD";
    o.SetData = "ABCD";
    Console.WriteLine(o.EventWorking);
}

Thanks,
Arindam D Tewary

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

OriginalGriff1-Mar-10 8:21

OriginalGriff

1-Mar-10 8:21

It is worth changing your code slightly to cope with the case when you have no handler - if you think about it not handling an event is not an error, it is perfectly normal. As such, it should not throw an exception.

Arindam Tewary wrote:

protected virtual void OnDataChanged(DataChangedEventArgs e)
{
    DataChanged(this, e);
}

If you change your code to:

protected virtual void OnDataChanged(DataChangedEventArgs e)
   {
   EventHandler eh = DataChanged;
   if (eh != null)
      {
      eh(this, e);
      }
   }

Then a potential source of run time exception is removed. (The load of "eh" is to handle the admittedly rare case when the handler is removed between the test and the execution)

You should never use standby on an elephant. It always crashes when you lift the ears. - Mark Wallace

C/C++ (I dont see a huge difference between them, and the 'benefits' of C++ are questionable, who needs inheritance when you have copy and paste) - fat_boy

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

Arindam Tewary1-Mar-10 8:29

Arindam Tewary

1-Mar-10 8:29

Hi OriginalGriff,

You are very much correct. I would be changing my code for sure. Thanks for your comment. Highly appreciate it. Smile | :)

Thanks,
Arindam D Tewary

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

Saksida Bojan1-Mar-10 8:47

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

1-Mar-10 8:47

I would use:

protected virtual void OnDataChanged(DataChangedEventArgs e)
{
   if (DataChanged != null)
      DataChanged(this, e);

}

I think this way it is easier to read and not declaring new variable

Luc Pattyn1-Mar-10 9:32

Luc Pattyn

1-Mar-10 9:32

No, what Griff gave you is the correct way to do things; there is a (probably small) probability that another thread could remove the content of the event between your code checking it for null, and your code using it. A local copy fixes that.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that.
All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event (Solved)

Saksida Bojan1-Mar-10 9:51

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event

1-Mar-10 9:51

tham. Now i see the problem. It was same example in a book i was reading. Maybe it is time to burn that book

Luc Pattyn1-Mar-10 7:49

Luc Pattyn

1-Mar-10 7:49

Arindam Tewary wrote:
if (value != DataString)
{
OnDataChanged(new DataChangedEventArgs("Event Fired !!!"));
} DataString = value;

furthermore it is wrong to throw the event BEFORE the data change has occurred. A delegate is likely to read SetData to find out what the new data value is, it should not get the old value instead.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event

Arindam Tewary1-Mar-10 7:57

Arindam Tewary

1-Mar-10 7:57

Hi Luc,

Thank you very much for your valuable input. Its great to get some input from MVPs Smile | :)

Thats surely bad design. I would change that immediately. As I was digged into that "NullException", so I overlooked that. Please if you want to provide any other input also, although origianl problem is solved, please provide.

Thanks,
Arindam D Tewary

Re: "Event" is null while invoking custom event

DaveyM691-Mar-10 10:32

DaveyM69

1-Mar-10 10:32

There are many articles and blogs that deal with events but most are a little overwhelming initialy.

I wrote this[^] article to provide a gentle tutorial which you may find useful.

Dave

Tip: Passing values between objects using events (C#)

BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)

safely end a thread

Yustme1-Mar-10 6:54

1-Mar-10 6:54

Hi,

I'm trying to end 3 threads in a save way. I can get 2 threads to stop, but the last one doesn't seem to abort.

My try:

// Volatile is used as hint to the compiler that this data
// member will be accessed by multiple threads.
private volatile bool stopRequested = false;

this.stopRequested = true; 

// Use the Join method to block the current thread 
// until the object's thread terminates.
this.thdPageContent1.Join();
			
this.thdPageContent2.Join();
			
this.thdFileComparer.Join();

After the thdFileComparer thread, i got a messagebox that 'tells' me the threads are stopped:

MessageBox.Show("Threads stopped successfully");

Any idea what I might be doing wrong?

Thanks in advance!

Paulo Zemek1-Mar-10 7:07

Paulo Zemek

1-Mar-10 7:07

The join method only waits for a thread to end... it does not abort the thread.

So, if your thread is in an infinite loop (or infinite wait), your join will be waiting infinitelly.

I must say I need to know the thread code to know what's wrong... but, if you are using some event (ManualResetEvent, for example) in the 3rd thread, you must set it. So, the thread can execute (and check the stopRequested variable).

Yustme1-Mar-10 11:45

1-Mar-10 11:45

Hi,

What do I need to do to end the thread after the Join?

The 3rd thread has a while loop and in side that while loop i got a nested for statement.

One for statement in another one.

I check for the volatile variable in my while loop. And once more inside the deepest for statement.

That should be enough right?

Paulo Zemek1-Mar-10 13:53

Paulo Zemek

1-Mar-10 13:53

If you check the variable, it should end.
Are you sure there is nothing more happening?
Can't you put a break point in the last join and, instead of executing it, as all threads are stopped, check what's happening in the other thread? Maybe put some breakpoints at that moment and then allow the Join to go... you must see exactly what the other thread is doing.

Yustme1-Mar-10 22:31

1-Mar-10 22:31

Yes I'm sure. The variable gets checked alright. But it doesn't seem to stop it.

Here is that thread i'm talking about with the code:

private void FileComparerThread()
		{

			while (this.stopRequested != true)
			{

				for (int i = 0; i < Directory.GetFiles(this.dest).Length; i++)
				{
					string[] filePaths = Directory.GetFiles(this.dest, "*.txt");

					for (int j = 0; j < filePaths.Length; j++)
					{ // check if btnCancel has been pressed if so, end this thread.
						if (this.stopRequested != true)
						{
							// check if file names are not the same:
							if (filePaths[i].ToString() != filePaths[j].ToString())
							{
								bool comparedFiles = this.FileCompare(filePaths[i].ToString(), filePaths[j].ToString());

								// move 1 file if they are both the same to another directory
								if (comparedFiles)
									Directory.Move(filePaths[j], Path.Combine(this.dest2, Path.GetFileName(filePaths[j])));
							}
						}

					}
					
					if(filePaths.Length > 3)
						File.Move(filePaths[i], Path.Combine(this.dest, Path.GetFileName(filePaths[i])));
					
					Thread.Sleep(5000);
				}
			}
		}

And then I got a this.FileCompare() function that checks 2 files for equality thats it.

I've done some big time debugging. Its just looping those for statements.
Even though the stopRequested = true.

It's not comming out that for statement.

Paulo Zemek2-Mar-10 6:17

Paulo Zemek

2-Mar-10 6:17

I think I know what's the problem.
You didn't return in the internal if.
So, stopRequested is true. Your method does not compare the files, but continue in it's loop, waits for 5 seconds and so on.

So, I think instead of:

if (this.stopRequested != true)
{
... some code...
}

You should use:

if (stopRequested)
  return;

Yustme2-Mar-10 6:19

2-Mar-10 6:19

Hi,

You're right, About an hour ago i got an else statement after that if-statement with a return.

I'll use your suggestion. Saves me some line of codes :P

Thanks!

Luc Pattyn1-Mar-10 7:13

Luc Pattyn

1-Mar-10 7:13

Yustme wrote:
the last one doesn't seem to abort

Aborting a thread is a bad idea as it leaves things in an unknown state. But then maybe you're not really calling Thread.Abort() at all?

Yustme wrote:
this.stopRequested = true;

This doesn't do anything, unless your thread is periodically checking that variable. But then you did not show such code, making me doubt you understand how your code is working.

Hmmm | :|

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]

Yustme1-Mar-10 22:34

Re: HELP on .NET Remoting

1-Mar-10 22:34

Hi,

I didn't abort the thread. That was just 'speaking'.

I know, i check its state on different places periodically.

The code has grown too big to post it. I've reduced it now.

I didn't see your post yesterday!

HELP on .NET Remoting

jekkup11-Mar-10 6:03

jekkup1

1-Mar-10 6:03

Please i would appreciate any help i can get on getting my project started,cannot integrate the different classes on my server.

Abhinav S1-Mar-10 6:23

Abhinav S

1-Mar-10 6:23

You might need to read through some chapters on .Net remoting in a C# book. They will provide some samples that will start you up.

Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...

Click a button from a external/downloaded (unknown) html

Serenity11-Mar-10 5:36

Serenity1

1-Mar-10 5:36

I would like to be able to click a button (which is always located in the same area) of a external/downloaded html page?

Any help would be appreciated.

Language C# visual Studio.

Re: Click a button from a external/downloaded (unknown) html

Saksida Bojan1-Mar-10 5:41

Re: Click a button from a external/downloaded (unknown) html

1-Mar-10 5:41

Of specific HTML or all possible pages, including www.codeproject.com, wwww.google.com and others?

Or are you refering to Button submit within Form html tag?

Serenity11-Mar-10 5:55

Serenity1

1-Mar-10 5:55

Of all or any page.

For example... I download or view a page (lets say http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1649/Csharp.aspx) and via code I click the "Search" button.

Re: Click a button from a external/downloaded (unknown) html

Saksida Bojan1-Mar-10 6:04