|
>> you know better than anyone what are you interested on, so...
still you can omit the 'good' one.
|
|
|
|
|
Searching for another thing I found this link[^]
I have liked it because it talks about different things and seems ok (didn't read anything it in detail, jut did an overview), taking a look can be worthy.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but have you decided on the programming language yet?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Hey rajesh.
sorry for a delay. Would you be able to answer my question if I don't mention the
programming language? e.g., maybe smth. just indicating programming principles.
etc. nice examples. in pseudo code. etc.
If no, okay, let's take C/C++
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think I had code complete first edition. Is the second one much better than the first one?
|
|
|
|
|
Is Italy void of any bookstores? Browse through any of them and I'd guess you'd come away with no fewer than a dozen "programming" books.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
well.. recursively speaking yes..there is indeed.
But If there is no any other source than books matching my needs, than okay..
|
|
|
|
|
In my function i used like this
void SendActiveData()
{
CTrans tData;
CTrans cData[50];
CMainFrame* tFrm ;
tFrm->tId = 0;
i added header file of both class.But why in Cmainframe it shows undefined value.in watch window i get value for
tData :
(int)tFrm 98237468 int
tFrm:
(int)tData 98236684 int
Because in this fucntion i can use function declared in CTrans,it doesnot show any error.But the fuctions used in CMainframe,it shows error.
Why?
Anu
|
|
|
|
|
One reason could be, because you are creating a pointer to a CMainFrame, but you are not connecting it to your own MainFrame. If you overload methodes or have added variables in your own one, the main class you are pointing doesn't have to know it. In MFC I would make:
CMainFrame *pFrame = (CMainFrame*)AfxGetApp()->m_pMainWnd;
Hope it helps you.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified on Friday, December 25, 2009 7:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
By using like as u said,now its working fine.Very very thanks.
Anu
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome 
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem basically is that you're not initializing the local variables.
Uninitialized local variables are said to have undefined values.
The undefined values are those that you see in the watch window.
|
|
|
|
|
We define the structure for a linked list as given below.
What i know that the structure of a linked list consists of two parts i.e. value and the pointer to another variable.
Considering this the value should be of integer type (which it definitely is) but the address pointer should be just an integer pointer (according to my view.).
Now why address pointer is defined as a structure and of the same name as of the list????
struct list {
int val;
struct list * next;
};
|
|
|
|
|
Because the list is a list of structures that contain data. In your case, the data is just a simple int. Generally, the data will be more complex.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
If you just do the next a pointer to a int* then you won't be able to have more elements, you are going to miss the "next" pointer on the following item.
In other words...
struct list {
int val;
struct list * next;
};
allows you to have a lot of items connected with "next"
struct list {
int val;
int* next;
};
Here you have ONLY one item, with two elements, an integer and a pointer to an integer.
Think about... what would happen if you add more elements to your item? you could have, for instance...
struct list {
int iVal;
double dFactor;
char cType;
struct list * next;
};
Which pointer would you need to go to the next item in your list? int*? char*? double*?
That's the reason why you need to use struct list* next.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot. Your reply cleared my unclear concepts effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
you managed to confuse yourself by picking bad names; here is basically the same code:
struct node {
int val;
struct node * next;
};
but now the struct is called "node", since it holds one node, i.e. one item that could be part of a linked list; and in such list each node, except the last one, points to the next node.
|
|
|
|
|
.
Merry Christmas, everyone!
Do functions MakeUpper() and MakeLower() of CString work well for Non-English languages, such as French, German, Greek, Japanese, Korean etc?
I don't know if the languages specified above are case-sensitive, my question is:
Can MakeUpper() and MakeLower() change case for Non-English characters if they are case-sensitive?
|
|
|
|
|
I would expect them to work well with European languages based on the Roman, Greek, and Cyrillic alphabets. Asian languages are another story. Japanese has three character sets; Kanji (Chinese), Hiragana, and Katakana. Kanji is not an alphabet and as such has no capitalization. Hiragan and Katakana are phoentic character sets where each character represents a syallable. They also have no capital forms. I really don't know about Middle Eastern languages.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, thanks, you look like a language expert.
"I would expect:"
Yes for following languages:
French
German
Greek
Latin
No for:
Japanese
Korean
How about followings?
Italian
Russian
Portuguese
Spanish
Is this your opinion?
Could you write down a list as above, so it is clearer?
Could you also add more main languages as you know?
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Craig wrote: "I would expect them to work well with European languages based on the Roman, Greek, and Cyrillic alphabets"
includeh10 wrote: "How about followings?
Italian
Russian
Portuguese
Spanish
"
Cyrillic is for Russia and many of the North-Middle East-Europe lands.
The rest are include in Roman alphabet. Same as Flamingo, Holandish...
North Europe (Finland, Norway and other scandinavian countries), Turkey, Poland and some others are based in roman alphabet, but they have some special characters (specially vocals), but in my opinion they should accept the case sensitive as well.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Last time I try to help you, jerk. 
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Craig wrote: Last time I try to help you, jerk.
I could be wrong, but I don't think he meant to offend you.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
