|
Mekong River wrote: Hi, if I set an image with its size 2Mb or 5Mb as a desktop background, does this will impact the startup performance of windows xp?
What happens when you try it?
|
|
|
|
|
My system load very slow than usual when I logged on to my profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Mekong River wrote: My system load very slow than usual when I logged on to my profile.
Does it load at normal speed when you revert to the smaller image file? If so you have found the problem, and the solution.
|
|
|
|
|
We have got a requirement to deliver a redundancy solution using SAN. Let's say we are going to build two RAID 5 arrays and then mirror them to a RAID 1. I have a hardware solution that can build two RAID 5, but they cannot build a mirror on the top of them. I have a number of questions:
1) Can Windows Server 2003 build a RAID over SAN at all?
2) Can Windows Server 2003 build RAID 1 on the top of, in other words mirror, two RAID 5?
2) If I power off one RAID 5 and power it on again, can Windows 2003 rebuild the entire or part of this RAID 5 via the mirror?
Regards,
Best,
Jun
|
|
|
|
|
First, if you're looking at a software based solution for RAID (i.e. Windows), you're screwing yourself performance-wise.
You should really be directing this question to SAN vendors to see what they can offer.
|
|
|
|
|
Read this[^], specifically looking at RAID 1+0 and RAID 0+1, these seem to be doing what your asking, just not in software though generally.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
If you are looking at a SAN based solution - it probably means you have a lot of data and need lots of features (like iSCSI with pass-through write capability). Otherwise, you could use a NAS device with SATA disks. First of all (as mentioned in an earlier response) do NOT use a software based RAID solution. Secondly, if high-availability is important, go with RAID6 and not RAID5. If there will be a lot of I/O on the array, you need a performance boost. My overall advice: don't build one yourself. Purchase a NetApp (with their really cool RAID DP) or HP StorageWorks unit.
We purchased an HP StorageWorks MSA2012i. Our configuration has 2.7TB usable space and uses a RAID6 array with dual controllers. I think it cost just over $7000 (with an account manager).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone,
I am looking for the exact meaning for Direct IP. Can anyone let me know whats exactly meant by DirectIP?
Tried googling a lot without luck.
Please help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sharath
|
|
|
|
|
Well I googled and found this[^]!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
My question is a bit generic. Please bear with me as i am not able to give the hardware scenario here.
How many maximum number of network interfaces can be configured on a typical machine in an enterprise setup. Is there any limitations in terms of number of network slots or the number of virtual IPs?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
You're limitated by your system resources.
In the GUI you can only add five IPs per connection, but that limit you can workaround by editing the registry.
Just remember that, if you have more than one gateway you'll need to manually edit your routes or install the RIP listener.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys,
Let me try to explain my situation as best as I can. I currently have 3 servers set up.
1) Application Server (a)
2) File Server (b)
3) Web Server (c)
Now between the Web server and the WAN there is a dedicated PC acting as the FIREWALL.
Now the thing is I am developing certain applications to communicate between server C and server a. Now server a has 2 network cards 1 being used to connect to the switch that connects server a and b to the rest to the office, and the other network card has a cable running from it ot the C machine as the C machine is on a sperate network than servers a and b.
Now here comes my problem i need to configure the Windows firewall on a to allow only certain connections,ports etc. from server C and rest disallow only for the connection between A - C but the rules must apply
Hope you guys understood, and any help would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
when I open my InetMgr and try to browse a website it gives me an error for HTTP 404 and says that the web page not found. Even the localhost is not opening.
I am getting the following error
========================================================
The page cannot be found
The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
Please try the following:
* Make sure that the Web site address displayed in the address bar of your browser is spelled and formatted correctly.
* If you reached this page by clicking a link, contact the Web site administrator to alert them that the link is incorrectly formatted.
* Click the Back button to try another link.
HTTP Error 404 - File or directory not found.
Internet Information Services (IIS)
Technical Information (for support personnel)
* Go to Microsoft Product Support Services and perform a title search for the words HTTP and 404.
* Open IIS Help, which is accessible in IIS Manager (inetmgr), and search for topics titled Web Site Setup, Common Administrative Tasks, and About Custom Error Messages.
======================================================
-----Have A Nice Day-----
|
|
|
|
|
I have a Sony laptop and contain 3 partition inside (C,D,E) drives. After I used my external hard drive, WD 1TB, to back up everything in the laptop. my external hard drive automatically copy the C, D and E drive and delete the partition that I used to have inside the external drive. What can I do to undo or recover my External hard drive back?? Pls help..
Thanks alot.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone
I'm after finding the best way to set up my network so that my Win2k3 can act as a VPN server.
I have an abundance of routers that can act as switches if required, but my current setup is as follows:
Modem into Linksys Router
All devices including server into said router.
With this setup, some clients are having trouble resolving host names when connected, and I have trouble connecting to the server from within the network unless I use IP address.
I have 2 NICs on the server, so I was thinking that maybe the correct setup would be:
Modem into Linksys Router
Nic 1 of Server into Linksys Router
Nic 2 of server into 2nd router (not sure if it should go in the modem port or normal port)
all other devices into 2nd router
Maybe config server to act as DNS server
I think this may fix my DNS problem, but I'm no expert on these things.
This would force all trafic through the server. Would this be a problem? What is the best way of doing this?
Many Thanks
oooo, the Jedi's will feel this one....
|
|
|
|
|
I would keep the hardware as it is.
Disable the DHCP on the router.
Install or enable DNS and DHCP on the server. Then set gateway and dns in the DHCP settings to point to your server.
|
|
|
|
|
Great. I'll give that a try.
The gateway and dns settings be on my router? or do you mean in the TCP/IP settings of the network connections on each machine?
Thanks, 
oooo, the Jedi's will feel this one....
|
|
|
|
|
No I mean that you should set the gateway (should point to your router) and dns (should point to your server) options on the dhcp server so that your clients can pick them up automatically.
This also means that you should leave the ipsettings on your clients to automatic.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. Your a star.
oooo, the Jedi's will feel this one....
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I am having trouble with one of my web servers, the aspnet_wp.exe process is maxing out the CPU usage for long periods of time and causes the web applications to respond very slowly. I was wondering if there's a way to monitor the incoming requests or current activity of the IIS/asp.net to pin point exactly what website may be causing this high CPU usage.
I'm running win 2000, IIS 5 and .NET 2.0
Thanks.
PS. I hope it's in the right section, I didn't see any board specific for server issues
|
|
|
|
|
Use the performance monitor. You'll find it in the Administrative tools folder.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
In Windows XP Pro, if you right click "My Computer" and you go to see the devices, you can modify the properties of the network card.
Once there you can set the advanced properties of the device and then you can select the "Speed & Duplex" parameter and set to a value.
In my computer it is:
10MB full
10MB half
100MB full
100MB half
Auto
Shouldn't it be 1000 MB if the network card is a 1GB capable card?
I've checked it in several computers of my company and it seems that I can only set it to 10 or 100, but not to 1000...
Any idea if it is normal?
|
|
|
|
|
Joan Murt wrote: Shouldn't it be 1000 MB if the network card is a 1GB capable card?
When your computer boots and your network device drivers have loaded one of the first things that occurs is the autonegotiation process[^]. If the device driver has determined that 1000GB speeds are not possible it removes the option by setting/removing some internel capability flags.
1.) Make sure your network card supports gigabit ethernet.
2.) Check that your cables are category 6 or above[^].
3.) Check all routers and switches your to which you are connected and make sure they support gigabit ethernet.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Check all routers and switches your to which you are connected and make sure they support gigabit ethernet
Do you mean that if for example my router is only capable to go at 10mbps then all the network cards that are autonegotiating the speed will go at 10mbps?
This can't be true... 
Side note: Well my Windows Vista computers never transfer files at more than 10mbps to the network... 
|
|
|
|
|
yep. the weakest link determines all.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
