|
Judging by the amount of posts you've cracked out in the last few hours, I can only assume that you're a clueless freak that should only be allowed near a computer under the supervision of a responsible higher lifeform, such as an amoeba. Why not do what the rest of us have done and buy some books, or maybe even do your own freakin' research before posting inane questions, you complete and utter waste of oxygen.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
if u don't know just shut up and di your own work....ok....FU
A S E L A
|
|
|
|
|
A S E L A wrote: if u don't know just shut up and di your own work....ok....FU
Hey, moron, I do know. And do you know how I know? Why, it's because I know how to read books. You may not be aware, but a book is this wonderful thing with paper, and words and information, all waiting for you to pick it up and actually think for yourself.
I may have to explain this words concept to you because you don't seem to be aware that you can actually expand single characters into these wonderful things which convey knowledge.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Could someone pass me a rope? I think I'm drowning in irony
|
|
|
|
|
Good morning Mr P, nice to here you sounding so full of the joys of spring. I just love the way these little tykes get woomphed to charcoal and yet still come back. You've gotta love 'em. Or flame 'em!
Crispy fries anyone?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
It's been a while since I've felt the need to roast the clueless, but today they've queued up and practically begged for a whupping.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: you complete and utter waste of oxygen
We really need to work on you speaking your mind and not holding back 
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
Help humanity, join the CodeProject grid computing team here
|
|
|
|
|
I know - I really need to stop being such a shrinking violet.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I have an RTF file on which I do string substitution for mass printing letters. I'd like to convert the output RTF to PDF? Currently I use a dirty trick of printing the RTF to a PDF printer but this seems like a slightly messy option.
Is there any 'free' library that I could use to generate a PDF from my RTF? I've tried to Google it but all i could find was a bunch of paid libraries.
An small example would be helpful too.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missed that one. Thanks for the help SunRays.
|
|
|
|
|
Mridang Agarwal wrote: Missed that one.
Then what were you searching for?
|
|
|
|
|
any use case diagram or class etc....
|
|
|
|
|
i just seen your previous posts and coincidentally *all* of them have 8 votes of 1. it motivates me to keep your record intact, so be it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops. Well, he's over that 8 count now. 
|
|
|
|
|
Going for a new record. 
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Practically all your posts demand code or don't really ask a question, like this one. Either try writing code for yourself or spend your money at rentacoder.com, but stop asking stupid questions and expecting people to do your work for you.
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
Proud to be a 2009 Code Project MVP
|
|
|
|
|
C#.Net? Is there another variant, hidden away on the shelf of Microsoft's back room, which is like C#, but doesn't use the .Net framework? Please, send me teh codez!11
|
|
|
|
|
What? (See that was actually a question)
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you could always download the code for Paint.Net, deconstruct it - figure out what's going on internally and then try to convert it into what you want. Alternatively, you could take up a career as a village idiot; you're amply qualified for that role.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
From looking at the other posts here, that's a huge village with lots of room for many idiots.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello...
I have a problem with tooltip. I use the standard settings :
AutomaticDelay = 500
AutoPopupDelay = 5000
ReshowDelay = 100
ShowAlways = true
If I put the mouse over a button, it shows the tooltip for 5 sec,
after 5 sec the tooltip is not visible anymore. If I drag my mouse outside
button and drag inside again, the tooltip doesn't come anymore.
I must restart the application to see the tooltip again.
Any suggestion, how to solve this problem ?
I use VS2008 with target framework 2.0.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried going off the control for some time (a few seconds) and then going back?
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
How are you initialising the tool tips? I typically insert a method into the Form's constructor immediately after InitializeComponent. The example code is taken from a simple app and the tooltips work as expected.
Alan.
private void InitialiseToolTips() {
tt = new ToolTip();
tt.SetToolTip(SaveHdrBtn, "Save a copy of the header");
tt.SetToolTip(WriteHdrBtn, "Overwrite header in selected file");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all....
Let me explain about the project am working on now.....
I have a specific device with a dedicated IP address and port, whose methods can be called by using the web services. So whenever i require some data from the device i create a proxy for the specified web service and any method in that particular web service can be called and used. By this way am able to achieve the functionality. But the problem is, the time taken by the proxy to establish the connection is very high. So whenever i run my application to call a specific method to acquire some data it takes more time to establish the connection, but once the connection is made, it is quite faster in the consecutive method calls.....
e.g
myapp 127.1.2.3 1254 time
myapp---->>> exe name
127.1.2.3---->>> IP address as an argument
1254---->>> port number as an argument
time---->>> command name as argument
will print the time of the device in the screen.
Any new command like date, counters etc...
can be given as
myapp 127.1.2.3 1254 date
myapp 127.1.2.3 1254 counters and so on.....
Each of this commands takes more time to establish the connection and obviously more time to print the results.
So i planned to run a windows service which will take the ip address and port as the argument and run in the background, so that it establishes the connection and which can just return the live proxy name to myapp whenever required, so that the methods can be called using the existing proxy....
I have even created a test windows service(without any webservices and proxies for checking) and installed and checked. But it takes only int as arguments that too only (128 to 256)...
i have googled about this and found some techniques called remoting, IPC mechanisms etc.... But no fruitful results on what i am expecting....
Please suggest me how to proceed with this and any sample codes would also be greatly appreciable....
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
