|
|
Me too! That's why I asked 
|
|
|
|
|
The workaround I use now is calling something like:
cmd.exe /c "call settings.bat > nul & set"
and parse the output (of the 'set' command).
UGLY!
Any better solution will be more than welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Then why not just read an XML document?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I am executing the .net web applicaiton I get this error randomly. I mostly get it first time I start the application buy hitting F5. It ususally works second time. However, the execution might throw the same error when running the application second time as well.
FYI:I have C# web application
I see following message on the .net solution:
Disassembly cannot be displayed. The expression has not yet been translated to native machine code.
On the page side, I see
Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
This problem can be caused by a variety of issues, including:
•Internet connectivity has been lost.
•The website is temporarily unavailable.
•The Domain Name Server (DNS) is not reachable.
•The Domain Name Server (DNS) does not have a listing for the website's domain.
•There might be a typing error in the address.
•If this is an HTTPS (secure) address, click Tools, click Internet Options, click Advanced, and check to be sure the SSL and TLS protocols are enabled under the security section.
Thanks
Needy
|
|
|
|
|
Turn off "Show friendly HTTP error messages" in IE.
Turn off "Enable address-level debugging" in Visual Studio
Try again :P
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
i want to insert multiple rows to database in a single transaction via TransactionScope class, for this, i iterate through datatable that binds to datagridview for get list of rows to be inserted. here is my code :
using (SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection("data source=.;initial catalog=test;Trusted_Connection=Yes"))
{
SqlCommand cmd = con.CreateCommand();
cmd.CommandText = "insert Person(titleId,fname,lname) values(@titleId,@fname,@lname)";
con.Open();
System.Transactions.TransactionOptions trOptions = new System.Transactions.TransactionOptions();
trOptions.IsolationLevel = System.Transactions.IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted;
trOptions.Timeout = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 15);
using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope ts = new System.Transactions.TransactionScope(System.Transactions.TransactionScopeOption.Required, trOptions))
{
try
{
foreach (DataRow row in this.dt1.Rows)
{
int titleId = int.Parse(row["titleId"].ToString());
string fname = row["fname"].ToString();
string lname = row["lname"].ToString();
if (cmd.Parameters.Count > 0)
cmd.Parameters.Clear();
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@titleId", titleId);
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@fname", fname);
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@lname", lname);
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
con.Close();
ts.Complete();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
}
}
but when any error occur during foreach loop (insert loop), those rows that inserted to database, could not rollback.
where does my problem and how to solve it ?
Note : i know this can implement by SqlTransaction, but i want to do with TransactionScope class.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Wrap your TransactionScope around the entire thing. ADO.NET will autoenroll in a System.Transaction if one is in scope, but only if it is created within that scope. The way your example is written, you are creating your transaction after you create your command and connection...I don't think auto-enrollment is possible in that scenario.
using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope())
{
using (SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(...))
{
using (SqlCommand cmd = new con.CreateCommand())
{
}
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there
I'm just beginning to get my head around C#, having moved from a background in C/C++, Java, and (a long time ago) Pascal.
I'm writing a program in which I have declared a series of classes that model the data layer and which, as in this layer I'm working with .xml, the class names reflect the schema of that layer, with names like ...Node and ...ChildNode and the like. As I now move up to the business model layer, I'd like to recast these type names to others more suitable to that model. For example, instead of XMLProjectNode I'd like to just use Project.
I'm experimenting with aliases and using things like:
using Project = My.Namespace.XMLProjectNode;
but what I'd like to be able to do is declare these aliases somewhere in a once-for-all location so that they can be imported into any module for immediate use without the need for redefinition.
In C++ I would put some #defines in a header file and #include it wherever I needed them. However, I can't seem to find an analogous way to do that in C#.
Am I missing something, or is this not possible?
Many thanks
BS
|
|
|
|
|
It's not possible I'm afraid. You could always create a snippet with these defined and drag them in when you need them.
Cancel my answer. PIEBALDconsult is a coding god here - go with what he said.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure it is. Perhaps not advisable, and not a good fit in this situation, but possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Please expand. Based on my reading of the OP, he was asking if it was possible to store using statements in one location and then reuse them in other locations just by referring to this single location.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, just as in C like he asked:
C:\>type test.h
using System ;
C:\>type test.cs
# include "test.h"
namespace Template
{
public static class Template
{
[STAThreadAttribute()]
public static void
Main
(
)
{
Console.WriteLine ( "It works" ) ;
}
}
}
C:\>"C:\Program files\mingw\bin\cpp" -P -C -w test.cs test.csi
C:\>csc test.csi
Microsoft (R) Visual C# 2008 Compiler version 3.5.30729.1
for Microsoft (R) .NET Framework version 3.5
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\>test
It works
C:\>
|
|
|
|
|
Well blow me sideways with a plastic marionette. I've just learned something new - and if I could award you a 100 for that post I would. Way to go you keyboard lovegod you.
|
|
|
|
|
 I will quote you on that. Once I stop laughing. Which may be a while.
|
|
|
|
|
Get a room!
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
I just wonder if he's willing to be a reference.
|
|
|
|
|
I sounds like he's willing to be the father of your offspring!
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. One set of anklebiters is enough for anybody.
|
|
|
|
|
More than enough, in my experience~!
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
Great answer. 
Only caveat would be with #defines and #if/#else. Since C# DOES recognize those, the cpp preprocessor might be problematic if you used them for any reason (i.e. #if DEBUG blah)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but I have ways of dealing with them.
Actually, I only use it for # defines, it goes back to my PRO*C days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but generally just constants like:
# define MAXNAMELEN 32
I kinda wish there were a different directive for macroes.
It would also be good if the pre-processor took a switch to indicate it should only process the # defines and not other directives.
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe I misunderstood. My technique for having the C-preprocessor process only # defines goes back to my PRO*C days.
But, yes, I do (kinda/sorta) use macroes in my C# code... just to prove the point. But only when using CSC; I haven't bothered to try to use them with Visual Studio. Even though Microsoft gives good reasons for frowning on macroes in C#, I believe a bigger factor was integration with VS, and I don't fault them on that.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
