|
To find the difference between the two in a specific instance, .NET Reflector on the type you'd like to examine. You can download it for free from redgate.com.
Scott P
"Simplicity carried to the extreme becomes elegance."
-Jon Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
while working with winfroms in c# i found no of problems
1. when i manually modify my designer.cs surface. Such as checking the attributes. i lost my designer view. And having a massege that "the code within the initilizecomponents is generated by designer and should not be manually modified. Please remove any changes and try opening designer surface again "
Any solution....
2. How can we set the FormBorderStyle in c#
|
|
|
|
|
|
you mean that there is no solution for that?
i have modified that file and when i run my application, what it shows its according to that modified code.
|
|
|
|
|
Solution to what? If you get another appearance of you controls, change it back. If you are getting an error, please post it.
Regards,
Lev
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: you should never modify that file. Apart from anything else, it's regenerated by the IDE, so you're wasting your time
Generaly I agree but sometimes you need to go into it to solve problems.
Also I frequantly use it to see how a control gets initialized and added.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, sometimes you're just forced to edit the _designer.cs (like making some changes without the studio  ) But of course you should really know what you are doing.
Regards,
Lev
|
|
|
|
|
as Lev said above,"sometimes you're just forced to edit the _designer.cs"
it means when ever i manually change my Designer.cs
i would not able to see my form view?
|
|
|
|
|
hotthoughtguy wrote: it means when ever i manually change my Designer.cs
i would not able to see my form view?
Not exactly.
You see the designer generated code is being compiled on-the-fly when you open the design view. So, if you do some changes which won't compile (e.g. syntactic error and such), you'll end up with not working design view.
Let me say again, you should really know what you are doing, when modifying designer generated code.
Regards,
Lev
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote: it's regenerated by the IDE, so you're wasting your time
That's true, but I go in sometimes to change a component class to a non-system class, and the designer keeps it, even after regenerating (in fact, it fully qualifies the custom class with the namespace). Granted, you should avoid manually changing the file, it is possible to do.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
ok thanks a lot 
|
|
|
|
|
If you edit the xxx.Designer.cs file and the code isn't correct the designer can't display the form until the code is corrected.
Everytime you change something in the designer, this file gets rewritten so it's possible (but not certain) that your changes will get overwritten/erased. That's why it's called 'Desigener'.cs
If you need to make any changes of your own that can't be done in the designer, put them in the xxx.cs file or create a xxx.MyStuff.cs file and create another partial class (of the same name) in there, and call any methods from the xxx.cs before/after the InitializeComponent call as appropriate.
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
I am converting ArrayList to String Array in .NET 2.0 framework ...
string[] ControlButtons = (string[])controlList[i].ToArray(typeof(string));
but it through error 'object' does not contain a definition for 'ToArray' please give me solution to convert arraylist to string array
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try reading the error ? It doesn't know that the object is an arraylist, it only knows it's an object. So, you need to cast it.
((ArrayList)controlList[i]).ToArray
Why are you using Arraylist if you're using .NET 2.0 ? Use generic lists.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what it is you want to achieve but dropping the [i] turns that statement into something that compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
This works fine for me:
ArrayList list = new ArrayList();
list.Add("a");
list.Add("b");
string[] arr = (string[])list.ToArray(typeof(string));
I guess you should do:
string[] ControlButtons = (string[])controlList.ToArray(typeof(string));
Regards,
Lev
|
|
|
|
|
Hello to all,
Here is my code:
client.HostToClient_Bytes(new CommsInfo_Bytes(Bytes));
[Serializable()]
public class CommsInfo_Bytes
{
private byte[] _Bytes;
public CommsInfo_Bytes(byte[] Bytes)
{
_Bytes = Bytes;
}
public byte[] Bytes
{
get { return _Bytes; }
set { _Bytes = value; }
}
}
when i am calling HostToclient_Bytes i am getting error say "Object refrence cannot be set as an instance of an object"
So will anybody helps me?
Thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm just guessing but don't you need to declare a constructor without params if you want to serialize the object?
<br />
public CommsInfo_Bytes() {<br />
}<br />
Regards
Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I have done same implementation for messsage string passing in that i have not declare any empty construstor.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
But in string class i have declare as
private string _Message = "";
so any modification is needed in byte array declaration?
|
|
|
|
|
Normally this is not needed, but give it a try and set _Bytes = null;
Don't know if this is not the same, as everything is initialized with null...
|
|
|
|
|
Could you post the code of the method you call? (maybe the problem is within this method)
|
|
|
|
|
one would assume this means that client is null. Did you check in the debugger ?
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not show the code with the error instead of a class that's (probably) not relevant?
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
maybe someone can explain me, why this doesn't work in C#. Do i missed something, or is it a stupid idea to extend a return type of an override?
public class Class_a
{
Stream _something;
public virtual Stream Property
{
get
{
return _something;
}
set
{
_something = value;
}
}
}
public class Class_b : Class_a
{
FileStream _something;
public override FileStream Property
{
get
{
return _something;
}
set
{
_something = value;
}
}
}
Thanks & Regards,
Johannes
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
