|
If you are starting with it, try Virtual Box[^], which is free and open source.
Many are stubborn in pursuit of the path they have chosen, few in pursuit of the goal - Friedrich Nietzsche
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
[Microsoft MVP - Visual C++]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for ur suggestion
If U Get Errors U Will Learn
If U Don't Get Errors U Have Learnt
|
|
|
|
|
Good suggestion with VirtualBox. I forgot to mention that one in my post 
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but how possibly is cygwin remotely related to the query? The OP wanted to run the entire "Linux OS" from within Windows. So, he is looking for virtualization software. Not Cygwin, which is just an emulator.
Many are stubborn in pursuit of the path they have chosen, few in pursuit of the goal - Friedrich Nietzsche
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
[Microsoft MVP - Visual C++]
|
|
|
|
|
cygwin has nothing to do with running a Linux OS within Windows. Do reread the OP's question.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you can. I do so with Virtual PC and VMWare.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry if this post is in the wrong forum.
Here is my problem.
One of my customer has sent a mail to me and I read that mail using the web-interface of microsoft exchange server. The person who sent that mail recalled it after some time. The recalled messages also were there in the exchange server web interface. When my Outlook client fetched those mails, it deleted the original messasge and the recalled messages from server and are now available neither in server nor in client. Is there a way to see that mail again?
I tried the exchange server logs but only email status was available. Mail body was missing.
thank you in advance.
cheers
Varghese Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Varghese Paul,
It appears that there is no way to retrieve a message that has been deleted, no matter "how" was it deleted - by the recipient or by the sender with a recall request.
In addition to that, if a recall will succeed or not may largely depend on the tracking options that you would have set in your outlook. Refer to the following URL, which explains various scenarios in this regard:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA012304191033.aspx[^]
Many are stubborn in pursuit of the path they have chosen, few in pursuit of the goal - Friedrich Nietzsche
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
[Microsoft MVP - Visual C++]
|
|
|
|
|
Friends pls help me to undertand the causes for IIS hang
|
|
|
|
|
It can be a wide variety of different things causing the hangup.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
"Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
|
|
|
|
|
I can't find icon for my usb flash drive G: on my computer. It can be accessed via command line, however. Typing G:\ in the explorer's address bar says: 'the operation has been cancelled due to restrictions in effect of this computer'. This happened after I inserted my friend's pen drive on my system. what to do? Please help. Thanks in advance.
B2C
|
|
|
|
|
You might want scan the system for viruses...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am making one application that clone the disk to another disk.
In my application simply I am copying all the sectors from 0 to end to another disk.
It is working well for windows XP and VISTA there is no problem of drive letters and booting.
But in the case of windows 2003server when I clone Disk0 to disk1 then if i boot my system from disk1(cloned) then it is not assigning drive letters to drives(assigning drive letter to os drive only).
I simply tried one thing- I connected one 2003server disk to system and I deleted the drive letters manually. After restarting the system 2003Server does not assigns drive letters itself like XP and VISTA. Could you please tell me that why it is in case of 2003Server only?
Is there any security setting that I need to change so that 2003Server assign drive letters itself after restarting the machine?
Please suggest me to do this.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
All,
My environment is Windows XP 64 bit and am running 32 bit applications. When trying to attach memory validator to a running process, its not allowing me to do so. It shows a dialog box with "dll injection failed".
Any clue to resolve this would be of great help. Mem validator has helped us a great deal in the WinXP 32 bit world. But am not able to make it work in the 64 bit world.
Please let me know what am I missing?
Thanks
Rajdeep
|
|
|
|
|
The problem could be that Microsoft stopped supporting windows xp 64 in April/2005.Windows xp professional is currently supported {64 bit].
See www.answers.com /topic/microsoft-windows for more information.
- winch1020
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
please any one have a vb.net class for Managing SQL Users
or any sample which Explain how to add new user and set his permissions
Thanx Alot
|
|
|
|
|
|
1- i'm sorry but it's my first Message ...
2- thanx very much for links ...
|
|
|
|
|
SQL Users and permissions can be created with T-SQL commands, therefore all you need do to is create you own functions in VB.NET to execute the necessary commands. You will also find the SQL Server will also have stored procedures that can be utilised to achieve your desired results.
Steve Jowett
-------------------------
Real programmers don't comment their code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to read.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried, I'm sure for the first time this morning, to install an ASP.NET 2 web site on my laptop under IIS. I've previously done all my work in the built-in VS server. I was surprised to find, for the site, that Forms Authentication was "locked as readonly" in the management console despite being specified in web.config.
Enabling anonymous authentication and explicitly accessing the default.aspx page resulted in a "no element found" XML parsing error, despite the page being operational. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
re: Dave K: When you say "it can not", are you saying that the default theme settings in xp can not be tweaked and that the spywareblaster application and/or the firefox browser and/or any internet site I go to have the complete control as to whether or not the progress bar will be segmented.It seems very odd that every web site I happen to be on,that the progress bar is always the identically the same segmented display.So,its probably not the various web site formats that determine the look of the progress bar, because there would probably be some variations in the appearance of the progress bar at least by some web sites.
Then,is it the firefox browser application that is drawing the progress bar to have segements?
It is not the spywareblaster application that is determining the appearance of the segmented progress bar because I still get the same segmented progress bar even if I do not run the spyblaster program before I go on the internet.
I have not installed any other applications onto the xp that are specifically meant to change the appearance of the progress bar.
Which application on my computer is producing the same segmented progress bar?
If an application external to the xp operating system happens to be "relying on a standard windows component" to draw the progress bar,tell me , what does the appearance of the progress bar look like if windows xp default setting is being used to draw the progress bar? Let me guess , the progress bar would be a segmented green bar.
Also, why is Vista a solid green progress bar? Is it because the Vista operating system has a default setting that is designed not to allow any external applications to overide the appearance of the solid green progress bar?
- R.W.
|
|
|
|
|
First, hit reply on the last post in the thread to keep all of these posts in together. Don't keep starting new threads.
I'm not saying that the fault theme settings can or cannot be tweaked. I'm saying the you have little to no control over how the progress bar is rendered. The application has THE last say on how the progress bar looks. You cannot change that.
If you're talking about the FireFox browser, it's more than likely using it's own progress bar control, which XP themes won't touch anyway.
BTW, XP themes also has very little control over the progress bar appearance. It only works if whatever application is using the standard Windows control AND doesn't force the appearance parameters to whatever it wants, by passing the theme parameters.
Also, the website have zero control over how FireFox, or any other web browser, renders it's progress bar for loading a page.
Robert Winchell wrote: If an application external to the xp operating system happens to be "relying on a standard windows component" to draw the progress bar,tell me , what does the appearance of the progress bar look like if windows xp default setting is being used to draw the progress bar? Let me guess , the progress bar would be a segmented green bar.
If the app is using the Windows standard control AND doesn't force any parameters beyond the defaults, the bar is going to be segmented.
Robert Winchell wrote: Also, why is Vista a solid green progress bar? Is it because the Vista operating system has a default setting that is designed not to allow any external applications to overide the appearance of the solid green progress bar?
There are no settings that override an applications requests. Microsoft decided to change the default look and feel of Vista so there were no segmented progress bars used by default anywhere, so long as the standard control was used. An application can still opt to use it's own control to do this and can even tell the standard control to render segmented bars.
|
|
|
|
|
re: Dave K: You said that you thought that the firefox browser was likely using its own progress bar control.If it is then I guess firefox chose to use the xp default theme for the progress bar which is a segmented green bar because that is what is always displayed.
Similiarly,you would get a solid green progress bar if using the firefox browser with vista,since you say there are no segements used anywhere by default in vista.
One question I have is,if the firefox browser choses to use "the Windows standard control" and chooses the xp default theme which is segmented, does the firefox have the further option of locking down the xp default theme settings so that the computer user would not be able to access those settings and tweak them to produce a variation of the segmented progress bar such as a solid green progress bar as in vista?
If the browser settings happens to be set to allow
the computer user to access and change the xp default theme settings,what sort of tweaks would it take to produce an unsegmented green progress bar?Would a text editor such as notepad be required and if so,would there be very many lines of code to be entered?Or would the command prompt or register editor be used?
The firefox browser has so many add ons and extensions that are available,why have they never offered a simple add on for the xp operating system that would give the computer user the option of having either a segmented or unsegmented progress bar?The xp has been on the market for quite a few years.
R.W.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Winchell wrote: does the firefox have the further option of locking down the xp default theme settings so that the computer user would not be able to access those settings and tweak them to produce a variation of the segmented progress bar such as a solid green progress bar as in vista?
No, because there's nothing to lock. The progressbar control doesn't use any settings from any registry location or file that can be modified.
Robert Winchell wrote: If the browser settings happens to be set to allow
the computer user to access and change the xp default theme settings
The browsers have no settings that can allow or deny this.
Robert Winchell wrote: Would a text editor such as notepad be required and if so,would there be very many lines of code to be entered
There are no settings anywhere that can modify the behavior of the control.
Robert Winchell wrote: what sort of tweaks would it take to produce an unsegmented green progress bar?
Replace the standard Windows control with a version written by yourself that implement all of the same functionality on the very same COM GUID's that the original control uses.
Robert Winchell wrote: The firefox browser has so many add ons and extensions that are available,why have they never offered a simple add on for the xp operating system that would give the computer user the option of having either a segmented or unsegmented progress bar?
Probably because it's alot of work for very little benefit.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
