|
Hi everyone
I'm writing a web application which has a button called 'go', when it's clicked it takes long to execute, so I want to play a flash file while it's being executed, so I want to call two methods playflash function(written in javascript in the header of aspx file) and run(written with c# placed in the aspx.cs file), when this button is clicked how should I do this? I tried the following code but it didn't work onButtonClicked="playflash();run();"
Please help me.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use some AJAX calls to do this. Look at the AJAX toolkit.
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of onButtonClick, use onClientClick.
|
|
|
|
|
How to display thumbnail image in listview controller.
there are three type files in listview.
1,normal files : display system thumbnail.
2,image files : display image thumbnail.
how to do?
if you can provide the project ,very thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
I can supply you with my code which is downloaded from www.codeproject.com. I hope that you can get some information from my code.
|
|
|
|
|
I am executing a query
ObjectQuery query = new ObjectQuery("Select TimeWritten from Win32_NTLogEvent Where LogFile='Application' ");
it gives, Timewritten= 20080715091712.000000+330 which format of dateTime is it.
how could i compare it with DateTime having format mm/dd/yyyy HH:MM:SS, as i compare it with it gives error.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
I think you must write your own method to compare it.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am using http to get a request from a server. The server has been setup to receive a customer ID and return the balance.
However, I am getting an error message with the code I am using below: "Invalid URI: The URI scheme is not valid."
From what I can make out by using wireshark is that the server expects a customerID and the balance will be returned. I am not sure that the data is another parameter that the server expects.
So how can I write the URL that expects a parameter like the customer ID?
Many thanks for any extra help,
<br />
private void btnGetBalance_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) <br />
{ <br />
try <br />
{ <br />
HttpWebRequest wr = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("000.000.00.00:8080/billing/servlet/comm.billing.GetBalance?Date=17:54:24&CustomerID=8057"); <br />
HttpWebResponse res = (HttpWebResponse)wr.GetResponse(); <br />
StreamReader sr = new StreamReader(res.GetResponseStream()); <br />
string balance = sr.ReadToEnd(); <br />
} <br />
catch(UriFormatException ex) <br />
{ <br />
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message); <br />
} <br />
catch(Exception ex) <br />
{ <br />
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message); <br />
} <br />
} <br />
|
|
|
|
|
Problem solved.
I missed of the http://
|
|
|
|
|
Subtle, but it happens 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I'm currently creating a game that contains a lot of characters. I'm now facing the problem of getting a very high complexity in my application because of the high number of characters.
I wanted to make a CharacterHandler that creates instances of the characters (Need to be a factory patteren of a kind, character creations need to take game difficulty into accound etc.)
this is some code from a character:
public class Bananas : NormalBrush, ILevelObject, IPointObject
{
private readonly int _collisionGroup;
private readonly float _mass;
private Body _body;
private Geom _geom;
public Bananas(Vector2 position, int collisionGroup, float mass, float scale, ContentManager contentManager)
: base(Color.White, position, contentManager.Load<texture2d>("Content/Objects/Fruits/Bananas"))
{
_collisionGroup = collisionGroup;
_mass = mass;
base.Scale = scale;
}
}
Is there a way that i can change the inheritance of the objects to simplify the creation of the characters or maybe use C# generics to do the job?
Any improvements are welcome.
EDIT: To sum it up.
Instead of doing:
CharacterHandler.CreateBananas(position);
CharacterHandler.CreateOrange(position);
CharacterHandler.CreateApple(position);
I could do something like this:
CharacterHandler<bananas>.CreateCharacter(position);
and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a usercontrol inside a form.
The form has one toolStripButton.
I want change toolStripButton visibility from the usercontrol.
How can i do that?
I don´t want to open a new form!!!
In Form_Main:
public bool _visibility_form
{
set { ToolStripLabel_Username.Visible = value; }
}
In UserControl_Login:
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form_Main frm = new Form_Main();
frm._visibility_form = _visibility_usercontrol;
frm.Show();
}
bool visibilty = false;
public bool _visibility_usercontrol
{
get { return visibilty; }
}
|
|
|
|
|
You will need to give the UserControl a reference to the Form that contains it. You could then set that reference in the Form loaded event and use it in the button click handler.
|
|
|
|
|
Think about how any other control you have on your form call methods in your form... they raise events that you listen for. So, create an event / delegate in your user control then you can subscribe to it in your form and react accordingly.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am new to C# and currently using C# 2.0. I have
public struct event
{
public static int w_hr;
}
public struct day
{
public static event mon;
}
can I access day.mon.w_hr = 5; How do I accomplish this.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
To start with, you probably don't want to call it "event" it is a reseved word. If you use the notation that all class and struct names are Pascal cased (the start of each word in the name starts with a capital letter) then you won't have a problem there.
brigates wrote: can I access day.mon.w_hr = 5; How do I accomplish this.
Other than the fact you are using a reserved word, that should otherwise work fine.
Sorry - I missed the fact that w_hr is also static. See Guffa's response. It is correct.
modified on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 7:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
brigates wrote: can I access day.mon.w_hr = 5; How do I accomplish this.
No, you can't access it that way.
The w_hr property can only be accessed using event.w_hr as it is a static member.
brigates wrote: I am new to C#
Then you should not use structs, as they are trickier to implement correctly. Use classes.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a struct that holds a value up to UInt64. Depending on the value it could potentially be held in another Type.
I've got a function that whos return value is Type, which is the minimum required to hold the value.
From this returned Type, how do I create an object of that Type?
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look in the System.Reflection namespace for Activator (I think)
|
|
|
|
|
System.Activator Hmm... a little work to do to figure this one out!
Thanks Colin
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
The answer would be reflection. Whenever that's the answer, you are either doing something pretty complicated, or something wrong.
What is it that you are trying to accomplish, really? Usually there is an object oriented way to solve it.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
A member variable in my struct is a UInt64. (I'm only using unsigned types here!)
1. Assume that the member variable's value is 8 : The smallest Type that could have that value is a Byte so my method returns Type Byte.
From this Type returned by the struct I want to create a variable of Type Byte.
2. Assume that the member variable's value is 256 : The smallest Type that could have that value is a UInt16 so my method returns Type UInt16.
From this Type returned by the struct I want to create a variable of Type UInt16.
3. UInt32...
4. UInt64...
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I got it so far, but what is the point? What do you plan to do with the data?
If you create data of different types, the data has to be boxed in an object. To then use the data, you have to unbox it to the actual type.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Depending on the type, the data needs to be handled differently.
I suppose I could box the variable to object inside the method and make it return Object then something like
if (returnedObject is Byte)
{
Byte x = 0;
}
else if(returnedObject is UInt16)
{
UInt16 x = 0;
}but I was ideally wanting to return a Type as the value itself is not needed so there seems no point in returning it - only the type. Also, this way I have to stay within each if block or x is out of scope.
Dave
|
|
|
|
|
This works and will suffice if it can't be done by returning Type
object x = new object();
if (returnedObject is Byte)
{
x = (Byte)returnedObject;
}
else if(returnedObject is UInt16)
{
x = (UInt16)returnedObject;
}
Dave
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
