|
Hi All,
I want to convert text files (.doc,.txt..rtf) to pdf files using C#.Net.
if any one knows please send me the solution or how to do it.
Thanks in Advance
|
|
|
|
|
Asking someone to send you the code is a poor etiquette in programming forums.
The answer to your question is quite easy if you know how to use Google. Search for DOC to PDF converter. I know there are at least 1 open source tool and at least 4 commercial tools that do this.
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit.
From my latest post: "It's sobering to watch: the whole country stops for 2 minutes as a siren is blast to remember the 22,437 victims of terror and soldiers who died in defense of Israel..."
The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul
Judah Himango
|
|
|
|
|
Sophia Rekhi wrote: I want to convert text files (.doc,.txt..rtf) to pdf files using C#.Net.
As far as I know you would have to do a COM interop for this..
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am new to sharepoint concept. I am deploying custom webparts in to my sharepoint site. I deployed it using STSADM.exe but cannot group it into different categories. Can any one help me in this regard.
Expecting your reply
Cheers 
Mani.
First have the WILL then u WILL
|
|
|
|
|
Don't cross post
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
under which topic should i post this question....
First have the WILL then u WILL
|
|
|
|
|
What is the .NET 3.5 redistributable package..
Does it contain the whole library needed to run any app??
I am planning to build an application in .NET which would require the framework obviously and when I ship this to client then I would have to ship the .NET framework too for it to run..
My question is that is the .NET 3.5 framework redistributable package which is freely downloadable on Microsoft site enough for shipping with my client application??
Since the size of the package is only 2.73MB, will the whole framework be installed with this redistributable package and would this be enough for my app to run??
One possibility may be that the client may not have an internet connection.. So would shipping this redistributable package be enough or does the client have to download the framework from internet after installing this 2.73MB package??
Please reply..
Thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
Hey,
Not sure, because I haven't deployed 3.5 stuff yet, but I think there's one with Windows SDK 6 (the one installed automatically with VS 2008).
Should be somethere here if you have VS 2008 installed: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.0A\Bootstrapper\Packages\DotNetFX35
-- Everything is possible, even the impossible! ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
I've got a feeling that that 2.73MB installer is simply a bootstrapper which downloads the rest from the internet. At the moment the current framework weighs in at about 300MB, with SP1 (beta at the moment) Microsoft will be introducing a "cut-down" version (i.e. it excludes all the server stuff) which will bring the redistributable size back down to a few tens of megabytes.
I doubt it. If it isn't intuitive then we need to fix it. - Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
please, I don't know exactly, when/in which moment of my code execution is a customAttribute constructor of MyCustomAttribute:System.Attribute class called/activated...
I'd like use customAttributes on my methods and based on attribute parameters those methods will be called/executed or not.
thanks,
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
petermeter wrote: please, I don't know exactly, when/in which moment of my code execution is a customAttribute constructor of MyCustomAttribute:System.Attribute class called/activated
Are you using Visual Studio? Do breakpoints not work for you?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, 2008 version.
I discovered that the attribute constructor is activated/initiated when I enumerate attributes of MyMethod...
[Security("Admin")]
public void MyMethod()
{
... Attribute.GetCustomAttributes(....., typeof(....))
...method body
}
but I'd like activate/initiate attribute constructor without MyMethod body modification by .GetCustomAttributes...
and therefore I'm asking - exist a way how to perform custom attribute constructor automatically ?
[Security("Admin")]
public void MyMethod()
{
...method body
}
thanks,
Peter.
|
|
|
|
|
It shouldn't matter. But more detail on what you're trying to accomplish might be helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I want to learn from your advice about how to design data structure in the following scenario to be most efficient.
One thread will create data (composed of ID and content), and output to a queue or something (data structure could be chosen to make the scenario more efficient), the data created is very frequently working to produce data, another thread is responsible to aggregate data (for the same ID, aggregate the content and output to a file), and aggregation thread works less frequently -- sleep 10 minutes, aggregate and then sleep again.
I am going to find a solution which could balance,
1. Less performance impact to the data creating thread;
2. To make data aggregation thread works as efficient as possible and consume less memory.
Any advice about how to design data structures?
Currently,
- I am stupidly using a List, appending data by the data creation thread, and I think appending data to the List is less performance impact to data create thread than using Dictionary to insert. Am I correct?
- Read data from begin to end of another thread -- using ID as key into a Dictionary, since there maybe duplicate ID, so when I insert into the Dictionary, I will check if contains key, if yes, I will update the data, or else insert a new one;
- Using lock on the whole List to make thread safe. Does the lock on the whole List is too heavy?
Any smarter ways?
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
I am thinking this would be better done with a database. Databases have built in functions for maintaining ID's. They also have functions for aggregating the data in most ways you can think of.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Christian,
Is there a built-in data structure like MuitlMap in C++, which allows one key maps to multiple values in C#?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Christian,
If not using database, any ideas about what is the best solution you could have with memory based data structures?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Can anybody give me the sample code for this.
program that takes as its first argument one of the words 'sum,' 'product,' 'mean,' or 'sqrt' and for further arguments a series of numbers. The program applies the appropriate function to the series.
Requires basic control flow, basic operators, and the math library. (Complex numbers available?)
What are arrays like?
What about parsing / implicit conversion?
Are functions first-class (availability of Map() and Apply())?
Error handling: What happens on invalid data?
Free sample codes are here http://allabout-dotnet.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
How about doing your own homework.
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
|
|
|
|
|
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
smileguy wrote: program that takes as its first argument one of the words 'sum,' 'product,' 'mean,' or 'sqrt' and for further arguments a series of numbers
Do you mean takes as command line parameters. Or takes as input via the console. Or takes as input via a windows form. Or takes as input via....
smileguy wrote: Requires basic control flow, basic operators, and the math library.
Naturally, what else would it have?
smileguy wrote: What are arrays like?
They are like sequential list of things.
smileguy wrote: What about parsing / implicit conversion?
I don't know what you mean by that.
smileguy wrote: Are functions first-class (availability of Map() and Apply())?
Functions? You might want to go to VB.NET for that. We have methods in C#.
smileguy wrote: Error handling: What happens on invalid data?
You tell me, it is your program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is some course just starting, or have you got this far before falling apart ?
You need to do your own homework, if we did it, how would that help you ?
Christian Graus
Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Sure:
namespace Homework
{
public static class Math
{
[System.STAThreadAttribute()]
public static int
Main
(
string[] args
)
{
if ( args.Length > 1 )
{
System.Console.WriteLine ( DoMath ( args ) ) ;
}
return ( 0 ) ;
}
}
}
Now just write the DoMath method.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
