|
Hi,
there seems to be a flaw in the logic; if you drag a character "O" over the text "ABC"
starting at A and ending on C, how will your approach ever repaint the B, unless you are
moving that slow that it gets broken up in several small drags/invalidates?
You either have to limit the motion as to keep start and end positions adjacent, or you
have to enlarge the invalidation region to be the hull of start and end (and then allow for
some deviation from a straight line).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: if you drag a character "O" over the text "ABC"
starting at A and ending on C, how will your approach ever repaint the B
It doesn't have to. Check this:
Start at A:
OBC
Move from A to C, first repaint A:
ABC
Then repaint C:
ABO
The B never changes, so it doesn't have to be repainted.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
You're right, at least in theory; not sure how precisely GDI+ does what it promises to do though.
I have had some experience with several graphic systems (long before .NET) both on Mac and Windows
where graphic messages got not just executed one by one, instead they got "optimized", i.e. they
either got combined into bigger messages, or skipped alltogether since a later one would
hide the efforts of a previous one still in the queue.
Not sure this applies here, but my message is be on the defensive, hence slow down the drag,
or extend the invalidation region.
|
|
|
|
|
I Invalidate 2 Rectangles:
one where the circle was, and the current position.
My own theory is that when it moves fast, this computer isnt fast enough to do both repaintings.
in one "refresh cycle".
It only repaints the prevous region that overlaps the current.
so when i move to the right the right part is cut off because the previous rectangle
overlaps the previous one on the left.
(and the new rectangle can't be repainted because my computer is to slow)
so the O moving over the ABC thing isnt the problem here I think,
making the regions bigger would make things even worse i think..
(i could be wrong. haven't tried it yet, i will when I have the time)
the idea of combingin both Invalidate messages is rather interesting,
maybe i should implement it myself (or if someone has an idea here  )
and combine both rectangles in a bigger one ,invalidate the big one afterwards.
It would be a bit slower probably, but at least i will be sure everthing is repainted in one
"refresh cycle" (or whatever you call it)
is there an easy/fast way to implement this? (i mean combining 2 rectangles )
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
have a look at the Region class.
A region basically is a collection of 2D parts of a Graphics.
You can create it from simple shapes or paths, and perform logic on it, e.g. with
the Union() method.
And you can feed it to Graphics.Invalidate() and the like.
I am not convinced we are on the right track though. Couldn't the problem just be
the result of a bug in your code? e.g. you modifying one of the drawing parameters
at the wrong time? It could be helpful if you could show a screen shot where it goes
wrong, and the relevant code.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you painting everything in your OnPaint method? or do you also paint some in a mouse
handler? a drag handler?
|
|
|
|
|
yup, all painting in the Onpaint method didnt use the onpaintbackground method.
the mouse events handlers only set some private variables (like the position of the circle),
invalidates both the previous rectangle and the new rectangle
the invalidated areas will be both repainted
(they should be i think thats the problem)
the position of the circle (stored as a private variable) is then used to repaint the circle at the right position
in the OnPaint method (and the part of the background that needs to be repainted)
|
|
|
|
|
I realise something now:
I allways repaint the full ellipse,
I never say "draw ellipse partially"
(I have no idea how it would be done either)
so even when only the previous area is invalidated,
the ellipse/circle would be totally redrawn.
(so the invalidation of the new area doesnt have a purpose I think)
so.. I dont have to combine both rectangles here...
hmmm.
i should try to remove the invalidate(currentarea) statement and see if that
would give an improvement
(but not today, I have to finish a report  )
|
|
|
|
|
ok i removed the invalidate(currentarea) statement
(wich was not needed)
but the problem still was there
increasing the size of the area fixed the problem.
but i still believe it hasn't anything to do with the "abc problem"
because i think guffa is right about this:
Start at A:
OBC
Move from A to C, first repaint A:
ABC
Then repaint C:
ABO
The B never changes, so it doesn't have to be repainted.
if i move fast with the mouse, and i go from a to c it never reaches b,
never paints anything on location b...
so it never has to refresh the b area.
PROBLEM FOUND:
I changed the code on the mousedown method to (previously only onmousemove),
and it seems when i only invalidate the
previous area, the ellipse only gets draw partially. (very easy to notice when i click next to the clippingrectangle)
the ellipse clips to the clippingrectangle during the onpainthandler...
so previously, the redrawing was indeed unable to redraw previous and current rectangle in one "refresh cycle"
so there are 2 ways to solve this (i think):
either i have to let the FillEllipse method know it doesnt have to clip to the rectangle
(i have no idea how i could achieve this, unless i change the clippingrectangle after
drawing the background, but i don't give it a big chance)
or ill have to combine rectangles with the region stuff...
|
|
|
|
|
I have created installation setup with InstallShield. Installation works really well. When the program is uninstalling I need set some flag values on database which is located on a remote server. I am using a webservice for that. Installshield allows to execute a method in supplied assembly when uninstalling the program. So I created a class library and written the flag resetting code in a method say "ResetDBFlag()". I have added necessary entries to installshield wizard. This class library is tested and it communicates perfectly with webservice.
When trying to uninstall, it's showing error Can not find entry point to function - Make sure you have exported the dll. I have googled, and all links says it's an issue with using DLLImport attribute. But I have no DllImport attributes specified. Anyone faced similar kind of issues ? Or do you know any alternative approach to satisfy my requirement ?
|
|
|
|
|
N a v a n e e t h wrote: DLLImport attribute
Can you export the function by using the .def file?
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Aday wrote: .def file?
Cool. Thanks for the reply. I searched for .def files, but all the links are about C++ and talks about exporting C++ dll's. What would be for C# ? My dll is in C#.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried dumping the exports with the linker?
|
|
|
|
|
Spacix One wrote: dumping the exports with the linker?
Thanks for replying, but I am not getting your point. Can you explain it ?
|
|
|
|
|
link /dump /exports {filename} and see if what you're calling is even there
You can also use the alias dumpbin /exports {filename}
I think you need Com visible set to true to be able to see functions outside other .NET assemblies, which would include install shield. There shouldn't be a problem calling a managed function from unmanaged code if the target PC has the CLI installed...
|
|
|
|
|
N a v a n e e t h wrote: for C#
omg... my apologies. I totally spaced out which forum I was in.
As I re-read your posting, InstallShield cannot find the entry point for the DLL but a webservice can? Would seem to point to a problem with InstallShield.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns
|
|
|
|
|
Installshield likely doesn't have a clue that this is a managed dll. I would suggest you make a small exe and run it from Installshield to do this, rather than a dll (or just a shell of a managed exe that uses the dll you have already made).
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Graham wrote: I would suggest you make a small exe and run it from Installshield to do this
I thought this option too. But I need to return a value to installshield which indicates whether flag reseting is complete or not. But if I used EXE, this won't be possible. There may be cases like webservice is offline, in that case uninstall should break.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually i got a situation i want to enplane it.
I have an exe file that when i give it any path by parameter it generate 5 files as out put. But problem is that in the same directory where the exe is located. How can i handle this situation to fore this exe to generate out put at the source location.
One answer is that copy my exe to the source location ant run it after running delete my exe.
But how can i do it Programmatically i have no idea.
I you have any solution or idea regarding to it plz froward to me.
Thanks for all reply in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
When saving the file, why not just give it the full path to where you want it to be.
So rather than giving it the file name "myfile.txt" give it the file name "c:\users\myaccount\documents\myfilename.txt"? (or where ever you want the file to be written).
|
|
|
|
|
I am giving full path to the target file i.e
"c:\doc\text.txt"
but the proble is that there is not any argument to tell the exe to where save the output files. Bydefalult it save files from where the exe is running.
I have no code of the exe it is third party exe i am only using it....
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
you may want to use Environment.GetFolderPath to obtain part of the path
you are interested in.
Environment.GetFolderPath(SpecialFolder.ApplicationData)+@"myappname\"
is a typical way of doing this.
|
|
|
|
|
Three little methods that might help.
System.IO.File.Move(@"c:\SourcePath", @"c:\DestinationPath");
System.IO.File.Copy(@"c:\SourcePath", @"c:\DestinationPath");
System.IO.File.Delete(@"c:\FileToDelete");
It's probably better to generate the output files, them move them to the required location rather than copying and deleting the exe, but that's up to you really.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't know the full path of a file, but know you can access the files System.IO.Path.GetFullPath();
If you want to know where just a System.IO.File.Create("newFile.txt"); will write the file you can use System.IO.Directory.GetCurrentDirectory(); but it's best to give the full path of where the .Create() should make the file...
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to implement something similiar to the depends utility.
thanks
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
