|
There isn't anything that can do that. You have to rewrite the code from scratch.
|
|
|
|
|
Sunil123 wrote: I am finding something that can convert VC++ project to C#.net
Anyone can help me?
The human brain. That's about it. There are just too many differences for this to be done effectively by a tool.
|
|
|
|
|
You are going to have to pretty much rewrite from scratch. Map out what the C# code is doing and hand translate to C++.NET.
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you're going to have to become an honest-to-god programmer now. No more hiding behind cut/paste.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
By hand.
Its not all bad though - Managed C++ will pretty much compile your existing code, you'll just have to decide what managed interface to expose. That depends on what your library does...
|
|
|
|
|
Its been a year that i have used .NET for development, and now am back to it again.
Now, the problem is that I need to work on an application developed on the .NET 2.0 framework, and am wondering which MS IDE to use with it
should i use:
- Visual Studio 2005
- Visual Studio .NET Professional
- Visual Studio .NET 2003
- Visual Studio 2008
I dont have the MSDN subscription for VS .NET 2005 
HELP!
------------------------------------
Vision is the ability to see the invisible
|
|
|
|
|
.NET 2.0 = Visual Studio 2005.
Though 2008 can use .NET 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5.
|
|
|
|
|
Dont i need to use something like
VS .NET 2005 ??
I am confused if i would be able to work with the 2.0 features and ASP pages in VS 2005?
------------------------------------
Vision is the ability to see the invisible
|
|
|
|
|
There is no ".NET" version of 2005. ".NET" was dropped from the Visual Studio name with the release of the 2005 version.
|
|
|
|
|
You could always use one of the free Visual Studio Express editions. There's a version for web development - Visual Web Express, and a straight Visual C= version.
|
|
|
|
|
If you need to target the .NET Framework v2.0 you can use any of the Visual Studio 2005 or Visual Studio 2008 versions.
The breakdown looks basically like this:
Visual Studio.NET .NET 1.0
Visual Studio.NET 2003 .NET 1.1
Visual Studio 2005 .NET 2.0
Visual Studio 2005 (with .NET 3.0 extensions) .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0
Visual Studio 2008 .NET 2.0, .NET 3.0, .NET 3.5
There is not VS.NET 2005. The "VS.NET" name was dropped after VS.NET 2003.
Keep in mind that using VS2008 to target .NET 2.0 or .NET 3.0 you are actually targetting .NET 2.0 SP1 and .NET 3.0 SP1.
Scott.
—In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.
—Hey, hey, hey. Don't be mean. We don't have to be mean because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
[ Forum Guidelines] [ Articles] [ Blog]
|
|
|
|
|
Easiest would be to stick with VS2008 all the time because not only do you have much better features and an environment to work with but it can also target .NET 2.0 as well as 3.0, 3.5 etc and do all the classic stuff like VC++.
|
|
|
|
|
VS2008 allows targeting of 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5...
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
I have a case where an assembly dynamically loads another assembly based on what it needs to get done. In some cases, it loads itself (or a copy of itself - not sure) to attend to the task at hand.
Is this a problem from any standpoint? Performance hit? Over utilizing memory, bad practice, etc?
Thanks,
Andrew
|
|
|
|
|
Only one copy of the code is loaded, whether you do it normally or by reflection.
There's no ill-effects to the rest of the system if you do it through reflection. Though, calling methods and instantiating objects through reflection is a bit slower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't cross post, it's considered rude
|
|
|
|
|
Hi !
I want to make some kind of Process/application/EXE that cannot be terminated using the task manager. for the security purpose.
Thank you
Sunil Patel
|
|
|
|
|
Sunil123 wrote: for the security purpose
I think you might want to rethink your security strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
Sunil123 wrote: I want to make some kind of Process/application/EXE that cannot be terminated using the task manager. for the security purpose.
Sounds to me like you are trying to create some sort of a virus. If not I agree with the previous reply, in that you should change your security strategy.
Pete Soheil
DigiOz Multimedia
http://www.digioz.com
|
|
|
|
|
yes, it seems some what difficult. but i found that some system process that can not deleted using the taskmanager. when i try to do so it gives
Unable to Terminate Process
The operation could not be completed.
The operation is not valid for this process.
so I am looking for some what like this.
Thank You.
|
|
|
|
|
Sunil123 wrote: but i found that some system process that can not deleted using the taskmana
That's because they're running either as part of the kernel or are running under the System account, which you cannot use yourself.
There is no way to do what you're describing in a user-level application.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen some other process that also can not be deleted using the taskmanager. like some anti virus program's process.
|
|
|
|
|
These applications have typically been allowed to modify the kernel that give them systemwide privileges. There was a whole furore when Vista was released because it prevented AV programs from doing precisely that.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
