|
K Got it.
The actual issue is
When i place the data in List Ctrl the data is unsteady.As am placing data continuously(120 samples/ sec)and i have run the s/w for many days continuously, i need to delete the data in List Ctrl otherwise buffer of the List Ctrl will overflow.After displaying 150 samples in Ctrllist am starting to delete at this moment data is unsteady.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I reset tmy ListCttrlView everytime the OnDraw is called to empty all datas and then I write the newest values.
void CMyTabView::OnDraw(CDC* pDC)
{ if (m_bJustOpened)
InitializeView ();
if (m_bListRedraw)
DrawViewElements ();
return;
}
In initialize views I configure the number of columns (may be variable from 8 up to 32). Write the name of columns and so on...
By DrawViewElements (); my FIRST line is: m_clcRuleList.DeleteAllItems ();
and then I write them down another time.
And with that you can call the OnDraw easily with an pDoc->UpdateAllViews (NULL); in a Timer with the interval you desire
Greetings.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
|
|
|
|
|
shir_k wrote: int nIndex = ptrCmdResp->GetItemCount();
ptrCmdResp->RedrawItems(nIndex,nIndex);
Comment out these two statements and see what happens.
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
There is no difference
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
So if all you are ever going to show is 150 items, why not store those in a fast container of some sort, and populate the list control from that container instead. Doing I/O on such a container would be way faster than the same I/O on a UI control. Make sense?
"A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am having an issue converting this
string pRetVal;
if ((PROP_TYPE_MASK & PropertyID) != PT_STRING8)
{
return 0;
}
redmap::mapi::FoundProperty prop = m_Message->FindProperty(PropertyID);
if (prop.second)
{
pRetVal = _bstr_t(prop.first.lpszW);
return (pRetVal);
}
else
{
pRetVal = ("");
return (pRetVal);
}
There is something wrong in how I am converting prop.first.lpszW because the out put I am getting is instead of "text here" I am getting "????????"
originally this is a COM made snippet
BSTR* pRetVal;
if ((PROP_TYPE_MASK & PropertyID) != PT_STRING8)
{
Error("Invalid property type");
return E_FAIL;
}
redmap::mapi::FoundProperty prop = m_Message->FindProperty(PropertyID);
if (prop.second)
{
ATL::CComBSTR bstr (prop.first.lpszA);
return bstr.CopyTo(pRetVal);
}
else
{
ATL::CComBSTR bstr (L"");
return bstr.CopyTo(pRetVal);
}
Now what is wrong with my conversion? What is the right thing to do?
Thank you all,
Jj
|
|
|
|
|
I got it know I didn't notice I was using lpszW instead of lpszA.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi... this is a bit philosophical ... I noticed a class attributed getting corrupted *on return* of a function... BUT when I step INTO the function, no memory corruption even when debugger pointing at *last* line (return statement) of the function. It wasn't until [the moment] debugger stepped *out* of the function when the class attributed is corrupted.
I'm looking for general idea/approach to such problem:
<br />
class CSomeClass { <br />
void MethodA(...) <br />
{ <br />
... <br />
MethodA1(...);<br />
MethodA2(...); <br />
MethodA3(...); << Boom!! m_attrib corrupted the moment MethodA3 returned debugger still pointing at this line *after*MethodA3 executed/return (I know from Watch Window) <br />
MethodA4(...); <br />
MethodA5(...); <br />
... <br />
} <br />
<br />
int MethodA3(...) <br />
{ <br />
... code ... <br />
return id; << m_attrib still okay but this is last statement of the method! <br />
} <br />
<br />
static SomeAttrib m_attrib; <br />
<br />
};
Note that the attribute "m_attrib" is static. And I don't think this section of the code is multi-threadedn (i.e. I don't see any AfxBeginThread or anything similar within the process boundary).
I guess the question is, what happenned between last statement (return id) within MethodA3, and immediately after debugger step out of MethodA3.
Thanks!
REF:
http://www.eventhelix.com/RealtimeM...are_crashes.htm[^]
http://www.eventhelix.com/RealtimeM...#Using%20assert[^]
-- modified at 23:20 Wednesday 19th September, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
I would hazard a guess that the problem you are encounterring isnt happening where you think it is, and that this is in fact a classic stack corruption problem. Examine carefully the code in MethodA3() for buffer overrun conditions.
FYI, Both of the links given in REF: are broken.
|
|
|
|
|
The corrupted variable was allocated on heap..
thanks though...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Do need a favour here. I would like to monitor an application and kill it if it is hang and regenerate it. However, not able to find relevant code.
I'm able to get the kernel and user time by "getprocesstime". But not able to monitor the CPU usage (not able to get idle time) to kill the hang program.Understand that some programmer use "GetSystemTimes" function. But it does not work in my PC.
Any suggestion or free code to share? Thanks a lot!
-- modified at 23:29 Wednesday 19th September, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
littlecheer wrote: Do need a favour here. I would like to monitor an application and kill it if it is hang and regenerate it. However, not able to find relevant code.
I'm able to get the kernel and user time by "getprocesstime". But not able to monitor the CPU usage (not able to get idle time) to kill the hang program.Understand that some programmer use "GetSystemTimes" function. But it does not work in my PC.
Any suggestion or free code to share? Thanks a lot!
There are lots of ways for a program to hang. For instance, I've had just the user interface fail and the program keep running in the background. If you control the code for this program, you could have it periodically signal your monitor program that it's still working. If not, your problem is a lot more dificult.
Nathan
|
|
|
|
|
I see. Based on my understanding, the hang program will reflect very high CPU usage (program in a loop) or usertime and kerneltime unchange (deadlock). Is it possible to trace the particular application's CPU usage? Thanks a lot!
|
|
|
|
|
one idea: use Sysinternals' pslist -
(1) have another periodically run pslist<br />
(2) pipe the output the a flat file, <br />
(3) then your *other* application to parse the file for CPU usage<br />
(4) If ProcessA.CPU>30 Then killtask<br />
<br />
|
|
|
|
|
devvvy wrote: 4) If ProcessA.CPU>30 Then killtask
many of myserver application are so cpu savvy , it runs on 30-40% i.e. when acquring data from hardware at 20hz( i.e. 20 record per second). that will help ful atleast in my case!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
well change 30 to any number you like
|
|
|
|
|
My current monitoring application is written in C++ console. Is it possible to use C++ coding to solve this problem? Thanks a million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if you file get deleted.when you download the file!
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
Hello 2 everyone interested!
I am developing an application using a GPS receiver for PPC. I am using threads in my code, one of them deals with the GPS's functionality. I have 2 buttons on the dialog (using MFC, by the way) - GPS>on and GPS>off. If I start the gps, at some point stop it and in a matter of up to 5 seconds (or so) I start it again, I get an error and the application crashes.
If I wait more than those 5 seconds, everything works fine. I have started logging my application's steps after hitting GPS>off and discovered that it reaches to ending the thread after .. right... those aprox.5 seconds.
So, for now, I only start the thread if a flag is set (I set it just before ending the thread).
Because I don`t want it to just ignore the push of the button, I did
do {}while(flagThreadStopped!=true)
so now, everything stops if the user starts the gps in those critical 5 seconds. It resumes, after the flag gets set, but I think if there could be another solution.
It's not a critical problem now, as I'm developing the concept, but... later on, it could be. Ideas ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
shpid3r wrote: Because I don`t want it to just ignore the push of the button, I did
do {}while(flagThreadStopped!=true)
so now, everything stops if the user starts the gps in those critical 5 seconds. It resumes, after the flag gets set, but I think if there could be another solution.
It's not a critical problem now, as I'm developing the concept, but... later on, it could be. Ideas ?
I would add a status message to indicate whether the GPS is off, on, or turning off. I would also set it up to disable the "on" button when turning the GPS on isn't workable. I would set up a timer to update the UI a few times a second, as well as updating it whenever a button is pressed. Also, there's no need to set a flag if the background thread is really exiting. You can call a wait function (WaitSingleObject etc.) on the thread handle, which is considered signaled when the thread exits. When updating your UI, you can do the wait with a time out of 0, and check the return value for status info.
Nathan
|
|
|
|
|
Well, let me discuss your ideas one by one:
-you cannot determine when the gps is turning off. That Is, the function that closes the GPS Device doesn`t return a Handle (to use WaitForSingleObject) but a DWORD. Therefore, once you have commanded it to close, it's going to close in a certain time. Your flags all set accordingly to GPS Off, though 5 seconds it's on Turning_OFF mode, so to say.
- I do refresh my screen once every 100 ms (I've set a timer which I use for audio buffering, as well). I didn`t quite understand what you`re suggesting me to do here... Please expand
Thanks for suggestions!
|
|
|
|
|
shpid3r wrote: -you cannot determine when the gps is turning off. That Is, the function that closes the GPS Device doesn`t return a Handle (to use WaitForSingleObject) but a DWORD. Therefore, once you have commanded it to close, it's going to close in a certain time. Your flags all set accordingly to GPS Off, though 5 seconds it's on Turning_OFF mode, so to say.
You mentioned a background thread, which is a good idea for this sort of problem. You gave me the impression that the background thread terminates when the GPS is closed, which would allow you to just wait for the thread to terminate. Your approach of setting a flag should work regardless.
shpid3r wrote: - I do refresh my screen once every 100 ms (I've set a timer which I use for audio buffering, as well). I didn`t quite understand what you`re suggesting me to do here... Please expand
The idea is that instead of pressing "Off" and having the program hang for 5 seconds, the "Off" button could begin the operation in the background, and while it is happenning, there will be a message on the dialog indicating that the GPS is turning off, and both the "On" and the "Off" buttons will be disabled for the time. Then, when your refresh detects that the GPS is fully off, it can change the message and enable the "On" button. Throughout the whole process, the user could continue to use any features that don't depend on the GPS.
Nathan
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)