|
use arr.GetLength(dimension) method, where arr is an array.
(new double[2,4]).GetLength(0) will give you 2 and (new double[2,4]).GetLength(1) will give 4
Greetings - Gajatko
Portable.NET is part of DotGNU, a project to build a complete Free Software replacement for .NET - a system that truly belongs to the developers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I have one WebForm(.aspx) I m using this page for showing the reports. In that page there are two(2) DataGrid and 5 Labels.All Data is coming dynamically.There is one Button.
On click of that Button, I m sending mail of this Webform into PDF format . Now i dnt know how to convert my aspx Webform to PDF. Is there any inbuilt class into .net 1.1???? Plz give me detail coding.
Plz help me. I m searching this thing from many days. 
Thank you................
vinita
|
|
|
|
|
Check this
ABCpdf[^]
Sharp Pdf[^]
vhs17 wrote: I m searching this thing from many days.
You could have tried Google[^]
*jaans
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Is it possible to read data with the sqlcommand even though the database connection is closed? like:
connection.Close();
int returnval = (int)Commandobj.Parameter[something].value;
|
|
|
|
|
akkram wrote: Hi. Is it possible to read data with the sqlcommand even though the database connection is closed?
Why don't you try it and find out? It's the best way to learn.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would if i could, but at the moment im at work and have no way of testing it.
|
|
|
|
|
When you get time, I suggest you try it out for yourself.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
5ed for keeping your cool.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Then I assume that you don't know the answer either and wonder why you even bothered to answer my post. In the mean time ill continue googling for the answer /Thx
|
|
|
|
|
akkram wrote: Then I assume that you don't know the answer either and wonder why you even bothered to answer my post.
No necessarily true: Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
What the others were trying to to was to teach you that small problems like this are easily testable in a small application. You can then work out the answer from there much faster than posting on a forum and awaiting a response.
akkram wrote: In the mean time ill continue googling for the answer
And if you try it for yourself you'll have the answer. If you don't have access to visual studio right now then I don't see what advantage you have in knowing the answer right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: And if you try it for yourself you'll have the answer. If you don't have access to visual studio right now then I don't see what advantage you have in knowing the answer right now.
So what you are saying is that there is never an advantage/use to know anything about anything unless when you need to apply that knowledge in practice?
|
|
|
|
|
akkram wrote: So what you are saying is that there is never an advantage/use to know anything about anything unless when you need to apply that knowledge in practice?
No, I'm saying that the urgency in which you seem to be attempting to gain this current piece of information isn't immediately necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
No, what they're all saying is that if you don't have the skillset to wip up a small test app and test whether this is possible or not and do the research yourself, your career as a developer is over before it even begins.
Being able to do your own research, learn new technologies, testing your hypothesis, ..., are essential skills to surviving in the world of software development.
|
|
|
|
|
akkram wrote: Then I assume that you don't know the answer either and wonder why you even bothered to answer my post.
That doesn't necessarily follow. If you spend sometime round the boards, you will find that people often post questions before they have tried to find the answer for themselves. Something like this is so simple to prove that it is reasonable to assume that you will have to try it for yourself. The forums aren't here for us to do your work for you, or to do your thinking either.
The advice to try it for yourself is good advice. It gets you into the habit of trying things and only coming back once you've run out of things to try or got stuck.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
If, as you admit, you haven't tried to find the answer out for yourself, I'm not sure why you should expect others to give up their time to solve the problem for you.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
akkram wrote: I would if i could, but at the moment im at work and have no way of testing it.
Use Snippet Compiler[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, Mac, there's your problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice. This is a new one for me.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
You can't really blame this guy for not wanting to try anything out for himself, it's an extremely easy route to try in life.
I blame it on the parents.
|
|
|
|
|
althamda wrote: I blame it on the parents.
You think they should have exercised some self-restraint?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the greatest things about "software engineering" is that you can try out all sorts of strange things and no matter how bad the result is, you're unlikely to do any real damage to anything.
Never be afraid to just try; we learn more from our mistakes than from getting it right the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
 hello
i have a form in c#.net windows application.
in this form a dataset and a table adapter is used.so is a grid.
this form shows a grid that contains the records that are retrieved from a table in my database
how can I change the color of a row in a grid ???????
plz help me
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
