|
aqzman_ wrote: This program will only be going up on a in-office intranet though, so I'm not too worried about attackers.
Statistically, most attacks are from people within the organisation.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
true very true!!! 
I was born dumb!!
 Programming made me laugh !!!
--sid--
|
|
|
|
|
If CallerID is auto-increment column then you don't need to specify it's value
|
|
|
|
|
I need to know how one can insert a file(excel etc.) into the database using a query.
If some code to work around with will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Ashwin.
|
|
|
|
|
What type of database are you using (SQL-Server, MS-Access, etc)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is specifically for SQLServer 2005 Reporting Services.
1) How can i add a new folder in Reporting Services Solution(.sln)
2) How to add one more folder under 'Reports' Folder in Solution project
3)How to refer an .rdl file in one project(Proj1) from other project(Proj2)in same solution.
means i want to use the report(.rdl file) designed in one project folder in other reports in other project folders in same solution.
Karuna
|
|
|
|
|
Karuna Kumar wrote: Need immidiate reply
If you need an immediate reply then I suggest you open a support ticket with Microsoft. They charge money, but you get an immediate reply. Here you will find willing people who want to help, but they do so on their own timetable because they don't get paid for it.
So, where are your priorities: Do you want it fast (in which case you have to pay) or do you want it free (in which case waiting times can be lengthy)
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
"I wouldn't say boo to a goose. I'm not a coward, I just realise that it would be largely pointless."
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: So, where are your priorities: Do you want it fast (in which case you have to pay) or do you want it free (in which case waiting times can be lengthy)
Good point.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
In a few words, I have to convert a string retrieved from an Access database to a DateTime object.
I thought I'll use the Convert.ToDateTime() method. But there's the risk that the conversion will fail because the format will not be recognized. I think that this method uses the DateTime format taken from Contol Panel - Language Settings, so this would be tricky if the settings are different on another machine.
What would you do in this case?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a DateTime.TryParse and a DataTime.TryParseExact in .net 2.0 These should help you converting strings to datetimes in .net.
Ben
|
|
|
|
|
May it works for u check.
DateTime.ParseExact();
eg:
DateTime.ParseExact("01/05/2003", "dd/MM/yyyy", new CultureInfo("en-GB"));
agian convert it to string using Tostring()
Means provide culture specific format
Karuna
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't cross post. It's not very polite.
|
|
|
|
|
How can i save .4544453647867456353756 in database. Which data type is used?
No round figure
thks
|
|
|
|
|
Use "Double" datatype
Regards,
Satips. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow;
Don't walk behind me, I may not lead;
Walk beside me, and just be my friend. - Albert Camus
|
|
|
|
|
Satips wrote: Use "Double" datatype
Where ? In SQL or in Program ?
|
|
|
|
|
I managed upto 15 decimal place with float. Please Tell me a real time scenario where you will use such a big decimal value ?
|
|
|
|
|
I've checked followig table
CREATE TABLE TblC (Col1 int, Col2 varchar(5), Col3 decimal(38, 38))
INSERT INTO TblC VALUES(1 'AAA', '0.12345678901234567890123456789012345678')
Here max of 38 digits are inserted after decimal. having no integer portion.
Regards
KP
|
|
|
|
|
is it possible to use > operator for text fields in a WHERE statement ie:
SELECT * FROM tblmain WHERE tblmain.[Should Grade] > tblmain.[Week 1]
Where should grade and week 1 are single letter (A, B, C, D, E and U) fields and tblmain is a table containing these fields
note i have tried this already in vba... and it doesn't work just checking really if it is what i suspect it is
if not, any reasonable (by reasonable anything that can be done in access & vba) suggestions for a work around?
only way i can think of is having A=1 B=2 C=3 etc
|
|
|
|
|
It sure is possible, you just need to watch out for what happens if either field is NULL, and also be aware that "A" is not the same as "a" so you might want to force to upper case, of course, this might not be an issue depending on your constraints when entering the results.
-------------------------------------------
Damian - Insert snappy one-liner here.
|
|
|
|
|
Try comparing ASCII values of the characters
Regards
KP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I'm trying to create a "generic" hierarchical model to store simple parent/child relationships. The closest approximation to what I'm trying to end up with is strongly based on the file system model. In SQL, I've defined the following table:
- ID (auto-generated, unique, non-nullable)
- NAME (just a string to be displayed to the user)
- PARENT_ID
The one fundamental constraint above all others I want to enforce at the database level is that any PARENT_ID value, if it has a non-NULL value at all, must exist somewhere in the ID field in this table. There are other restrictions that would be nice to have, but I can live with having this one only as a starting point.
Ultimately, I want to be able to store something like this:
C:\TEST1\FOLDER1
C:\TEST1\FOLDER2
C:\TEST1\FOLDER2\SUBFOLDER1
C:\TEST2\FOLDER1
...as:
1, "TEST1", NULL
2, "FOLDER1", 1
3, "FOLDER2", 1
4, "SUBFOLDER1", 3
5, "TEST2", NULL
6, "FOLDER1", 5
For some reason, suggesting this sort of thing in primarily SQL-oriented newsgroups seems to make the natives want to break out the tar and feathers...I'm apparently "thinking too much like an older developer used to linked lists and pointers". Fine, maybe I can't see the forest for the trees, but this "simple" model (in my eyes), if I can get it to work, would provide me with all the flexibility I need.
Ultimately, I'm NOT interested in writing any convoluted recursive queries to walk back up the PARENT_ID chain for a given node/row. The most complicated thing I might do is draw a tree (in ASP.NET), starting at the top level only (listing those entries whose PARENT_ID is NULL), and fetch a node's children when that node is clicked (select those entries whose PARENT_ID matches the ID of the node clicked).
Is this approach going to work, or do I have to scrap this entirely and put myself through hundreds of pages of data modeling theory, as the SQL gurus elsewhere seem to be suggesting?
If this is workable, could some kind soul *please* show me a SQL script to create this table with the appropriate constraints in place--or at least tell me what to click in SQL Server 2005 Management Studio to establish the constraints. I can't figure that part out (defining the table is easy, it's defining the "must exist in the ID column" rule for the PARENT_ID column I'm struggling with).
I'll save the "what's with the animosity among SQL developers towards old-fashioned software developers" question for another thread...
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty UIs to click through be damned. I managed to define my table as:
CREATE TABLE CATEGORIES
(
CAT_ID int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
PARENT_ID int NULL,
CAT_NAME VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY(CAT_ID),
FOREIGN KEY(PARENT_ID)REFERENCES CATEGORIES (CAT_ID)
)
Thoughts welcomed anyway.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
