|
you can store something in a hidden field that causes it to change on the server, and do a postback.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guffa wrote: Can you describe what it is that you think is incorrect with the way that IE6 displays the page?
Render the supplied html in both ie6 and firefox, and look at the middle two red table cells on the top row. In IE, the left cell is MUCH wider than it is in firefox. Firefox is displaying it the way I think it should be displayed.
BTW, I'm on a 19-inch 1280x1024 display.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
The standard for the width of a container type element is the with of its content. However, IE6/IE7 in non STRICT mode adds the content plus the padding plus the border into the width of the container element. To avoid this, use the HTML 4.0 Strict doctype or higher.
|
|
|
|
|
Changing the doctype had absolutely no affect in either IE or FireFox. Besides that, the problem I cited is not merely content + border + padding.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
You have only specified the minimum with of the cells (that's how tables work), so the browser can choose the size of the cells freely, as long as they are at least the size that you specified.
If you use tables for layout and don't want the browser to make any decisions about the size of cells, you have to specify the size for every single column in the table.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
Tables are okay for a quick-and-dirty layout. However, the current trend suggests not using tables for layout but for displaying data that is best viewed in a grid. Your problem is reflected in the standard behavior of a table. Go to this web site, http://www.alistapart.com/[^], and you may find some information that might help.
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give." --Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Man, I really hate html/css...
Here's some html that displays correctly in Firefox, but incorrectly in IE6. Can anyone tell me how to make it look the same in IE6?
The problem concerns the two center red cells in the top row.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>My Web page</title>
<meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" />
</head>
<body>
<table width="100%" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:30px;" ></td>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:331px;"></td>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px;"> </td>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:15px;"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;width:30px;"></td>
<td colspan="2">
<table class="med" style="width:100%; background-color:#aaaaaa;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1">
<tr>
<th style="width:100px;">1</th>
<th style="width:100px;">2</th>
<th style="width:48px;" >3</th>
<th style="width:38px;" >4</th>
<th style="width:46px;" >5</th>
<th style="width:60px;" >6</th>
<th >Really wide column 7</th>
<th style="width:75px;" >8</th>
<th style="width:75px;" >9</th>
<th style="width:75px;" >0</th>
<th style="width:14px;" >A</th>
<th style="width:14px;" >B</th>
<th style="width:58px;" >C</th>
<th style="width:58px;" >D</th>
<th style="width:26px;" >E</th>
<th style="width:26px;" >F</th>
<th style="width:26px;" >G</th>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;width:15px;"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;height:15px;width:30px;"></td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color:#ff0000;height:15px;"></td>
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;height:15px;width:15px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Try to write a subject that says something about the problem.
Can you describe what it is that you think is incorrect with the way that IE6 displays the page?
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried and modified your code.. both browser is working fine
see the code below:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><br />
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><br />
<head><br />
<title>My Web page</title><br />
<meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /><br />
</head><br />
<body><br />
<br />
<table width="100%" cellspacing="1"><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;width:30px;"></td><br />
<td colspan="2" style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:980px;"></td> <br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:15px;"></td><br />
</tr><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;width:30px;"></td><br />
<td colspan="2"><br />
<table style=" height:58px; width:980px; background-color:#aaaaaa;"><br />
<tr><br />
<th style="width:100px;">1</th><br />
<th style="width:100px;">2</th><br />
<th style="width:48px;" >3</th><br />
<th style="width:38px;" >4</th><br />
<th style="width:46px;" >5</th><br />
<th style="width:60px;" >6</th><br />
<th >Really wide column 7</th><br />
<th style="width:75px;" >8</th><br />
<th style="width:75px;" >9</th><br />
<th style="width:75px;" >0</th><br />
<th style="width:14px;" >A</th><br />
<th style="width:14px;" >B</th><br />
<th style="width:58px;" >C</th><br />
<th style="width:58px;" >D</th><br />
<th style="width:26px;" >E</th><br />
<th style="width:26px;" >F</th><br />
<th style="width:26px;" >G</th><br />
</tr><br />
</table><br />
</td><br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:15px;"></td><br />
</tr><br />
<tr><br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000;width:30px;"></td><br />
<td colspan="2" style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:980px;"></td> <br />
<td style="background-color:#ff0000; height:58px; width:15px;"></td><br />
</tr><br />
</table><br />
<br />
</body><br />
</html>
Harini
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I am developing web toolbar I need images of toolbar buttons like "New", "Save", "Cancel" and "Delete". If any person have images kindly send to following address.
Shahzad Aslam
Software Engineer
shehzadaslam@hotmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
google image search.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
"I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )
|
|
|
|
|
Hello to all,
Which one is flexible/optimal solution to save uplaoded image.
Frist save image at server or from where you're site pages are save in any image folder and save only image name or link to database.
Secondly convert image to bite form then save whole bite form image to database.
My friends feel that second one is right choice, but i felt that frist one is correct as conversion procedure and retrival from database is completly time consuming and not correct from web hosting point of view.
Feel free to give all kind of suggestion.
Smita
|
|
|
|
|
Just 'cause you can doesn't mean you should. I don't believe the 2nd solution scales very well, or at least not as easily as the first.
Storing image files in a database increases managment overhead and maintenance windows for backups/restores. As the amount of image data stored increases you have to create separate filegroups for the image data. Then you have to put those filegroups on different disk arrays. But unless you can afford Enterprise Edition 2005 that's as far as you can scale. Ent Ed will allow you to partition the table across file groups and you can add new disk arrays to reduce the IO. But still you're only going to get so far before you've completely bloated your database and created all kinds of headaches. All of which involve figuring out how to scale UP, which is more expensive and not necessary in this case.
On the other hand if you store your images on a file server, when it fills up or becomes overloaded, you just change the path root used to store new images and you can scale OUT by adding a new server or location for the files. You can leave the old files where they are.
|
|
|
|
|
hi guys, I have created a web service and running fine. Then I added the asmx page in my web site project. Now i have to access this asmx page through windows form. but it give me an error that
"The request failed with the error message:
--
<html><head><title>Object moved</title></head><body>
<h2>Object moved to a href="/aspire/orgnws/DataManager.asmx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1">here a>.</h2>
</body></html>
--."
While i can access this web service page directly in browser, don't know why it has problem through windows form. Please tell me the solutioin. Thanks in advance.... 
Pawan
|
|
|
|
|
How did you create the proxy to the web service? If you are using visual studio you can just add a web reference to the windows from and it should work just fine. I am thinking that you have a problem with your proxy to the web service, probably the url is incorrect.
Ben
|
|
|
|
|
hi guys i have problem with inter communication of web services...
in my solution i have client form(windows project),web service called broker(in web site1) and another two web services A and B (in web site 2).
i added web reference of A and B to website 1.
also i added web reference of Broker to my windows project.
now i just wanna call method in A or B from my client form.to do this i wanna call broker to get URL of A or B.
prob:how can i call method of a A(web service) or B(web Service) using that url...
can somebody give me a solution....
|
|
|
|
|
If you create a proxy to your web service you can dynamically switch between different urls.
The proxy class could look something like this:
class WebServiceProxy : YourWebservices.orderService
{
public WebServiceProxy(string p_url)
{
this.Url = p_url;
}
}
Then the call looks like:
WebServiceProxy ws = new WebServiceProxy("yoururl");
ws.yourMethod();
Hope that helps.
Ben
|
|
|
|
|
Hi There,
I am looking for a Static Code Analysis Tool for Classic ASP?
Anybody know of such a puppy?
Thanks,
Davy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davy Mitchell wrote: Hi There,
I am looking for a Static Code Analysis Tool for Classic ASP?
Anybody know of such a puppy?
Thanks,
Davy
Yeah, we reviewed the CodeScan Developer product on our site. We were pretty impressed.
Software Review – CodeScan Developer
Considering the price, the product is pretty good.
Karl Rohde
|
|
|
|
|
I have a database and connected onto it, so now, I want everytime I select an item in the combo box on the web page to display contents of the database related to that same selected item.I want it to be an action performed event than for me to select an item and click submit.I don wana click submit.
NB:Its on a web page.I cant find auto post back
-- modified at 9:14 Thursday 24th May, 2007
kagiso
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at the Autopostback attribute in the Dropdownlist control.
|
|
|
|
|
hello all,
I want to paas a asp array to javascript's function.
is this possible
i m no able to paas this array to that function.
i m doing like this way -
<%
myArray = rs.getrows
%>
<span id="mySpan" onclick="myFun(<% myArray %>)"
<script>
function myFun(arrVal)
{
....
}
</script>
pls help me
Thanks,
Ankur Bakliwal
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to misunderstand how ASP and Javascript work. ASP works server-side; by the time the user receives his/her HTML+Javascript, ASP objects (and arrays, which are objects also) do not exist any more. That is why your code doesn't work.
To fix it(easy way): construct a string with ASP script, that will contain all members of the array, delimited my comma; pass this string to the Javascript (like you did) and construct an array within Javascript back.
-------------------------
Listen up! Teamwork means staying out of my way! (Seifer, Final Fantasy 8).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
