|
I was waiting for someone to say "WTL!" or "Attila!"
|
|
|
|
|
What is "Attila"? A new framework?
Any infos available?
|
|
|
|
|
It is a framework akin to WTL - for info on Attila, see http://www.sellsbrothers.com/attila
And it looks like there is hope for WTL yet...from the Attila mailing list
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sells [mailto:csells@develop.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 3:35 PM
To: Attila Hit Squad
Subject: RE: The death of WTL?
I have made some progress in trying to talk MS into releasing WTL to DevelopMentor so that we can get it out to the world permanently
|
|
|
|
|
It gets better than that even.
From the ATL Listserv:
> From: Nenad Stefanovic [mailto:nenads@MICROSOFT.COM]
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 5:39 PM
> To: ATL@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
> Subject: Re: WTL
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The truth is that WTL is not part of the Visual C++ now. There are no
> changes to its status in the Platform SDK - it will continue
> to ship, and
> the new version will be available. I don't know why is Tony
> saying what he
> said, maybe you can ask him.
>
> Thanks,
> Nenad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Found on Google on the "Chris Sell Attila" search:
http://www.sellsbrothers.com/attila/.
From the site:
"Attila stands for "ATL for Applications." Attila is a set of extensions built on top of ATL to provide application-level services in the same flavor as MFC.
|
|
|
|
|
> Maybe with WTL (which Microsoft has now claimed was
> a big mistake and is erasing 1984-style)
How so? I was going to try and learn WTL when the madness at work calms down!
Ra
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Goodhew from MS stated that WTL should never have been released and that MS have no intention of continuing it's availability. Check out this news item message for the quote
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Chris,
(sorry I know this doesn't apply to the topic)
How do you include hyperlinks in your postings? I'd like to do that too
|
|
|
|
|
The boards use HTML - so you can include any HTML excepting things like , <object> etc�
|
|
|
|
|
ahh, it means you can debug each line. And when it reachs to the end of each function, it runs that function. Or you can step over it and run the function when you meet it. in shorts, it is similar to BORLANDC 3.1 .Can you help me?
|
|
|
|