|
Hi,
I don't know how to exactly do this but there should be a way.
I want to ask why do you want to do this ? because as far as I know your host doesn't know anything about its listeners.It's the responsibility of a listener to register or unregister itself.
Anyway how about having a flag variable that if set,it will stop the service.
For example:
<br />
public viod Stop()<br />
{<br />
stopped=true;<br />
}<br />
<br />
private void OnSomethingChanged()<br />
{<br />
if (stopped) return;<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Thx for the answer, wasn't expecting anyone to reply anymore. I've thought about that solution too, but I think there should be a more elegant way to fix the issue.
The reason I want to do this: the class concerned here contains some data that's shown and can be modified in dozens of places in my application. I've created a sort of "undo" function that saves a copy of the object to memory so that the user can "rollback" on his actions. These copies should contain only data, and shoudn't even try to fire any events. While debugging I found out that some references were left to my cloned objects, meaning the data in these clones is getting modified just as my "foreground" data. What's more, the number of cloned objects in memory could eventually be many thousands, so the performance hit for even for simply checking a flag each time isn't something I want.
Since manually disconnecting my eventlisteners is so sensitive to my own errors (code intensive) I'd like to be sure all eventlisteners get disconnected from the event. I'd expect the event itself to contain a list of references to all listeners. As I said before: How else could you check an event for null.
Suggestions are still welcome of course 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
This case can be an example of memento design pattern.Using this pattern you can save state of your objects in another object(a memento) and then you can put you object back to its initial state.
for example:
<br />
public class Test<br />
{<br />
private int x;<br />
public EventHandler XChanged;<br />
<br />
public int X<br />
{<br />
get{return x;}<br />
set<br />
{<br />
this.x=value;<br />
if(this.XChanged!=null) XChanged(this,EventArgs.Empty);<br />
}<br />
<br />
public TestMemento GetMemento()<br />
{<br />
TestMemento memento=new TestMemento();<br />
memento.AddField("x",this.x");<br />
}<br />
<br />
public void SetMemento(TestMemento memento)<br />
{<br />
this.x=(int)memento.GetField("x");<br />
}<br />
<br />
}<br />
and here is TestMemento
<br />
public class TestMemento<br />
{<br />
public void AddField(string key,object value)<br />
{<br />
this.fieldsMap.Add(key,value);
}<br />
public object GetField(string key)<br />
{<br />
return this.fieldsMap[key];<br />
}<br />
}<br />
this way you can save an object state and load it again.
Take a look at serialization patterns in C# and .Net framework.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion, someone has offered me the memento pattern before, and next time I'm implementing a feature like this I'll be sure to use it. Unfortunately I found out a bit late about this in order to use it for the current project: Should I want to convert my project to use this pattern would mean I'd have to change about 1500 base datatypes to start using it, I'm afraid I don't have the time or spirit to do so.
For now I found an ugly hack around the problem: I serialize the class and store it to a memorystream, then inmedialtely deserialize it and add it to my Collection of "undo" objects. Since the event is marked as non-serializable it gets initialized to null as soon as I deserialize it. It's a bit ugly and I still don't see why I can't just set event myEvent = null . But this performs quite well actually.
Cheers and thanks for the help!
-- modified at 10:10 Friday 25th August, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Well serialization can be a good replacement for memento design pattern(except that you have to violate encapsulation somehow ,if you are using attributes)
I'm happy that you find a solution.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing an application that acesses a SQL server, logging on with SQL server authentication and would like to set the menu option acording to the permission the logon user or group has, is there any way of interigating the SQL server for user permissions.
Any help would be appreciated and many thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
do you means this?
if login user is 'Admin', then he will get all records in a table.
if login user is 'User1', then only some of records in table return, but all.
|
|
|
|
|
Not so much in retrieving all records but to disable the logon from accessing certain tables. The program will have menu options to get different data from different tables and certain logons are not to have access to this information.
Thank you for your reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I have tryed in Sql Server 2005 Express version.
it have this feature.
see details here
-- modified at 22:37 Thursday 24th August, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
If I remember right you can read the system tables to do that but the best way would be to use the internall parameters (@@something). You should write your own function in SQL to do either. This is a question for an SQL forum because I am sure someone did this before and it is going to vary depending on SQL version.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all!!
How do I convert the following to 1 line of code??
int intBottleQty = i * 6;
String strBottleQty = intBottleQty.ToString();
I tried String strBottleQty = i * 6; but it wouldn't convert. I always thought that integers can get converted to strings??
I hope someone can help me.
Regards,
ma se
|
|
|
|
|
try
string strBottleQty = (i * 6).ToString();
|
|
|
|
|
String strBottleQty = String.Format("{0}", i * 6)
|
|
|
|
|
try like this
int intBottleQty = i * 6;
String strBottleQty =Convert.ToString(intBottleQty);
i hope this will help u...
ayyp
|
|
|
|
|
ma se wrote: I always thought that integers can get converted to strings?
Yes, they can, but not automatically. You have to tell the compiler that you actually are wanting to do the conversion, and not just trying to assign an integer to a string variable by mistake.
Here are some of the ways that it can be done:
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString();<br />
string bottleQuantity = Convert.ToString(i * 6);<br />
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);<br />
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);<br />
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString(new CultureInfo("en-GB"));<br />
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString("0");<br />
string bottleQuantity = string.Format("{0}", i * 6);<br />
string bottleQuantity = string.Format("{0:0}", i * 6);<br />
string bottleQuantity = (i * 6).ToString("0", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);<br />
string bottleQuantity = string.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "{0}", i * 6);
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but if i are numbers ranging from 1 - 20, how can they be different in all the scenarios you have given me, I mean 1 is 1 and 2 is 2, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean? Why would they be different?
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
What I am trying to ask is why is there like 50 different ways to format an integer?? No matter how you format an integer, lets say for example the number 6, you won't get it to display differently than to a 6.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, you can format an integer in may ways. For example the number 1234567 can be formatted as:
1234567
00001234567
1,234,567
1234
1,234
000001234
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0-0-0-0-0-0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
0000 0123 4567
1
000001
...and so on.
Mostly, though, the different way of formatting values are used with data types like dates and floating point numbers.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hey..
I see what you mean. But thanks for the effort and time taken to answer my questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.i did a project a that records a transactions that customer make daily something like Bank,so i want to display only transactions that were made by a specific customer using his account number on the datagrid.the problem is it doesn't display the record i that requested it to display only
so i did something like this.
public bool DisplayTrans(string CBarcode2)
{
try
{
conn1= new SqlConnection(ConString);
cmdDisplay1= new SqlCommand();
daDisplay = new SqlDataAdapter();
dsDisplay = new DataSet();
cmdDisplay1.Connection = conn1;
daDisplay.SelectCommand = cmdDisplay1;
cmdDisplay1.CommandText = "SELECT CustomerName,ProductName,Price,EventName,BoughtDate,BoughtTime FROM Transactions WHERE Barcode2 =@Barcode2 ";
SqlParameter Bar = new SqlParameter();
Bar.ParameterName = "@Barcode2";
Bar.Direction = System.Data.ParameterDirection.Input;
Bar.Value = CBarcode2;
cmdDisplay1.Parameters.Add(Bar);
daDisplay.Fill(dsDisplay,"Transactions");
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message);
return false;
}
return true;
-- modified at 5:31 Thursday 24th August, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I assume that you have a problem with this code, and you're not just sharing it for fun ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
Actually this is quite useful. I've been awake all night try to figure out how to how query the database and fill a dataset. I could have gotten more sleep if I'd have only waited for this post.  
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,when i send the mail using smtp server(localhost) i can't receive any mail in the mailroot folder(even with out any error) what will be the problem....
here is my code........
SmtpMail.SmtpServer="localhost";
MailMessage msg=new MailMessage();
msg.To=txtto.Text;
msg.From=txtfrom.Text;
msg.Subject=txtsub.Text;
msg.Body=txtmsg.Text;
SmtpMail.Send(msg);
ayyp
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
