|
If people don't get angry (I'm too afraid to post this, since I have 11*1 in my last post )
I just wanted to inform that if we haven't any admin board, This link seems to have typo mistake : in the page http://www.codeproject.com/script/rumor/article.asp?id=411
the last link refers to http://www.codeproject.com/News.aspx?id=846 in which id probably must be 856.
Hope you don't mind too much, if I made a mistake and I don't be bombarded with a sudden attack.
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming, but not publishing my ideas too soon.");
}
|
|
|
|
|
This is not an attack!
Hamed Mosavi wrote: Hope you don't mind too much, if I made a mistake and I don't be bombarded with a sudden attack.
Hamed Mosavi wrote: I'm too afraid to post this, since I have 11*1 in my last post
First of all this is a forum, and whatever we write may be commented... either by 1 or 100!
The attack is (or atleast it should be) on the idea/concept, and not on the person who has written it. Such thought-wars bring great revolution.
So keep on posting.
Happy posting!
|
|
|
|
|
I understand Thank you.
and does thought-wars mean the argu/discussion after a comment?
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming happily ");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys,
If one of the links is not working, please let me know. Because if is not working for you, it is mostly likely not working in the newsletter. You can always reach me at jordon@codeproject.com
Thanks for your support, Jordon
Jordon
News Editor/Publisher
The Code Project Insider
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
But there are problems this way. I see your e-mail, many others don't. Even me might forget this e-mail, or where I first met it! If there was a more public place to discuss problem(s) we encounter, (Say an Admin board) I think it could be solved sooner.
I can remember that in one of other boards I saw a comment about a problem in next/prev links of a board at a time. I think these boards are not good places to report a problem, or something else related to admins. The main objective of this thread was that, it's why title says: "Is there any Admin board here?".
By the way, thanks you very much for the very nice forum created here. I love it and learned a lot boath from articles and peoples.
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hamed Mosavi wrote: and does thought-wars mean the argu/discussion after a comment?
Hey! I meant that only. You are clever!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In CodeProject homepage, in the Votes section, I have the following suggestions:
(*) Disable 'View Votes' unless the vote is cast.
(*) 'View Votes', can open up a small DIV using AJAX and if only the user wishes for further details like 'View Optional Text Answers', 'Discussion Board', a link can be given in the DIV to open the target page.
That would be very much user-friendly. Is'nt it?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
namespace LavanyaDeepak
Personal Weblog
The World of Deepak and Lavanya
ViewPoint 24x7
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Do all three of you use the same CP account 
You know you're obsessed with computer graphics when you're outside and you look up at the trees and think, "Wow! That's spectacular resolution!"
To Err is human, to forgive is not a COMPANY policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not brown nosing at all (o.k., maybe a little). I'm a lawyer by trade, and am a novice at programming. I latched onto ASP.net 1.0/1.1 early, tried my best to learn it, and created my own site wich was fun. When Whidbey (ASP.net 2.0) was announced, I was a bit bummed because I'm no developer and don't have much time to learn. However, I latched onto it too if only for MasterPages and Wizards (among other cool stuff). I'm sure I'll be latching on to 3.0 whenever that comes out.
Out of ALL the sites (ASP.net included), this is the best site on the net. It's chock full of code/samples/tutorials. That you let users contribute is your strongest aspect. A lot of what I have on my site was modified from code I found here, or tutorials I read, or just general design ideas.
That being said, I was wondering if you could create a new ASP.net 2.0 tab, and modify the ASP.net tab to be ASP.net 1.0/1.1 (althought that won't fit on the tab). 
I think this might have some good results: 1) obvious separation of the two platforms; 2) people may either update their own code, or modify other code to 2.0 (that benefits newer users, and, errr, me of course -- j/k); and most importantly 3) it will continue to make this the best site on the net. Think about it, how many sites out there that "were" good have just gone by the wayside, or provide too little content too few times, or <gasp> are strictly subscriber based? Code Project is in a good position to just kind of blow the competition away.
That's my two cents.
-REM
BTW, what's the little green mascots name?
|
|
|
|
|
remesq wrote: what's the little green mascots name?
He's Bob
You know you're obsessed with computer graphics when you're outside and you look up at the trees and think, "Wow! That's spectacular resolution!"
|
|
|
|
|
When reading an article and then clicking on the Messages at the bottom, the message is shown, and then Firefox immediately reloads the page.
But this doesn't happen in IE.
Any ideas... I've got version 1.5.0.3
Mahen
|
|
|
|
|
Well it does not happen with me. I am using 1.5.0.4
|
|
|
|
|
It was the Tabbed Browser Extensions!
I've disabled it, and it now works fine...
It's rather disappointing, cos I liked the extension.
Mahen
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good to have one since I happen to search a lot at CP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please eliminate the ability to give 1 to a post, unless sender describes his/her reason?
Like Windows 2003 that we have to explain the reason to shutdown a server, it might be good not to be permited to give a 1, unless we define a good reason, at least this way, we understand that the 1 has a true reason or not, if Like a usual message the reason will be published globally.
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
-- modified at 6:59 Tuesday 13th June, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Then, 2 becomes 1; we need to give reasons for 2...
Then, 3 becomes 1; we need to give reasons for 3...
Then...
So we need to give reasons for every vote. We can't vote any more.
- It's easier to make than to correct a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Voting is a fundamental pillar of western civilisation. To be denied the ability to vote would be a gross injustice.
Voltaire (1694-1778) wrote: I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it.
Jörgen Sigvardsson , on the subject of Wikipedia, wrote: Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least you have the chance to correct the wiki.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)