|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: I think we should restrict Voting by logged on users otherwise a casual visitor can vote preventing logged on from voting. Is'nt it?
I'm not sure what you are saying here. Are you saying that if a person who is NOT logged in votes, then a person that IS logged in cannot vote?
I think a vote can only be cast by a person that is logged in already.
ColinMackay.net
Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
When your reading an article's commments and you click 'next' you should be sent down to the comments and not at the top of the page. A small thing but some of the articles are quite long.
Also I wonder what performance improvements there would be to moving the site to asp.net 2 ? The performance of the site has been excellent lately but any enhancements would be welcome.
The users of the site could write the code for the upgrade, it could be a community effort. Someone writes the spec then we could all do a little bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
What's the deal anyway? You head back to Oz and all of a sudden you're visibly working; the extra UV make you hyper or what? 
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from the fresher tasting air and the increased UV there's one major difference about working from Oz: No meetings! 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have been observing a practice in CodeProject and typically in Survey, Duplicate Post activities of forums that the message like 'Vote only once', 'It looks like you have already posted ...' are being sent across querystrings.
I think, CodeProject can avoid this. Passing messages via querystrings is also dangerous though there are no critical transactions involved. Along with messages, a user can send a harmful scripting exploiting cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
I think a session variable can be set in the previous page, displayed in the target page and then reset or a hidden variable can be persisted with the message.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Web: http://www.lavanyadeepak.tk/
I Blog At:
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/deepak/
http://deepakvasudevan.blogspot.com/
http://deepak.blogdrive.com/
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen that name for Visual c++ and c++/cli were renamed/changed. But they/you forgot to change the names in the pull down meni.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand the need for adding different weights to the article votes, but it would be nice if the Lounge, Soap-Box, Suggestions, et al were equally weighted for all users. This would allow for better polling on those sites.
"If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math
|
|
|
|
|
And be able to change my vote when the article is updated.
|
|
|
|
|
Some text is overlapping here[^] on this message in lounge, i took a screenshot[^] too. looks like a bug somewhere i am using IE.
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg
|
|
|
|
|
Monty v2.0 wrote: looks like a bug somewhere
Naw, you just forgot to hit enter after the <blockquote>.
|
|
|
|
|
damn 
C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice to be able to read (expand) all messages of a thread, rather than one message at a time. The thread could then be easily printed, or a separate "print version" could be added as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Gates wrote: It would be nice to be able to read (expand) all messages of a thread,
That option is available, but only for CP Supporters. Personally, I find it harder to read long threads when every message is expanded.
--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP 
LINKS~! Ericahist | NEW!! PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: That option [to expand all messages of a thread] is available, but only for CP Supporters.
Not meaning to sound rude, but, um, why?
Michael Dunn wrote: Personally, I find it harder to read long threads when every message is expanded.
If they are really long, then perhaps. But, I personally find it easier to look at a thread if I can expand it and refer back to other posts. I find that the alternative method, fully quoting the thread, gets messy and harder to read if it is all inside one post. While it would be nice, very rarely will somebody reply to a thread by pulling out and quoting only the important information. Usually, it's all or nothing. Present company excluded.
|
|
|
|
|
That's not rude, it's a valid question. The expand-all option is available to Supporters because that's how Chris designed it - it's a perk of being a Supporter.
--Mike--
Visual C++ MVP
LINKS~! Ericahist | NEW!! PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote: The expand-all option is available to Supporters because that's how Chris designed it
it can be broken by simple greasemonkey script.
-Prakash
|
|
|
|
|
It can be "broken" by a tiny bit of script typed into the address field, or even by just disabling CSS; that's not the point though.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
