|
You should have to call the SetFocus function of the list view control.
nave
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that I need to use the SetFocus function, but where exactly should it be called?
WM_SETFOCUS // doesn't work
WM_INITIALIZE // doesn't work
When text is being updated within contols via WM_SETTEXT, would that cause a loss of focus? I thought these sort of procedures would pass the focus back if set at all.
|
|
|
|
|
u should have to set focus to the list control before you set an items selection state.
SetFoucs(GetDlgItem(hwnd,ID_DATA_LIST));
ListView_SetItemState(GetDlgItem(hwnd,ID_DATA_LIST),0,LVIS_SELECTED,LVIS_SELECTED);
nave
|
|
|
|
|
a) There is a style flag for listview that forces it to show selection in blue even when the control is out of focus
b) I guess you can call SetFocus(hwndOfYourListView) in WM_CREATE handler
WM_SETTEXT causes no loss of focus I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
waldermort wrote: I understand that I need to use the SetFocus function, but where exactly should it be called?
If it's a dialog then OnInitDialog
If it's a view then OnInitialUpdate
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
according to MSDN:
LVS_SHOWSELALWAYS
The selection, if any, is always shown, even if the control does not have the focus.
This is true but it isn't highlighted in blue. Nomatter where I place the SetFocus call, nothing is happening. I have tried before setting item state, after setting state, beginning and end of WM_INITDIALOG, WM_CREATE, WM_SETFOCUS, WM_IMNOTGIVINGYOUFOCUSHAHAHA. Infact the only place it is working is within WM_PAINT, but this is just wrong.
This control is on a dialog along with sevral other controls. The only other thing I can think of is to change the tab order, but still, SetFocus should be unrelated to the tabs.
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a dialog? If so then you must return FALSE from OnInitDialog if you are explicitly setting focus or else focus will be set to first control in the dialog.
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Nibu, You're the best 
|
|
|
|
|
Try:
ListView_SetItemState(GetDlgItem(hwnd, ID_DATA_LIST), 0, LVIS_FOCUSED|LVIS_SELECTED, LVIS_FOCUSED|LVIS_SELECTED);
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Hehe, Thats what I would normaly do, but since it wasn't working as I wanted I decided to break it into two lines to attempt to determine what exactly was wrong :p
|
|
|
|
|
 When you right click a CD/DVD-ROM, windows will show a menu, and one of its menuitem is just the "Eject"! I want to control the flow of eject action,when user click the menuitem, it will go into my codes.
I use the ModifyMenu function to modify the "eject" menuitem, but how could i know if the current menuitem is "eject",just as what i want? If use the MF_BYPOSITION flag, it is impossible to get the position of the "eject" menuitem. If use MF_COMMAND, after a long trace to code, i find the ID of "eject" menuitem can be case 31014://normal
case 30757://folder view
case 47://tree view while using folder mode
case 31078://short cut
case 102:// quick launch
case 38://tree view in the application of winrar
case 39://toolbar on taskbar
I have to use a switch statement to handle the condition.
I don't konw if the "eject" ID have other value, and if i find it, i have to modify my code, it boring me so much. Could someone help me to fix this trouble? All codes are place at function
HRESULT CXXXXXX::QueryContextMenu ( HMENU hmenu, UINT uMenuIndex,
UINT uidFirstCmd, UINT uidLastCmd, UINT uFlags ).
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
Could anybody, plz tell me the list of third party controls available, which can be used in an MFC Application.
Is there any third party control like XmlEditView?
Thanx a lot
"If you change then change for the good."
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I know:
UltimateToolbox Here[^]
UltimateGrid Here[^]
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Hello!
Thanx for replying. But, i dun wanna this type of controls.
I want a control like XMLEdit view. It should be more or less like the document area of xml Editor.
Thanx
"If you change then change for the good."
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had an simple object by using ATL Object wizard and a generic class CTCPSocket.
The com object name is CTest and interface is ITest. This class had a interface Add and a connection point Fire_notify.
And CSocket had two methods add_in and notify.
The code as following:
//CTest class
CTest:Add(long port)
{
CTCPSocket sk;
sk.add_in(port);
}
CTest:OnNotify()
{
Fire_notify();
}
//CTCPSocket class
CTCPSocket:add_in(long port)
{
//create a socket and listening
}
CTCPSocket:notify()
{
//created a tcp connectiong?
//when created a socket accept,pass the event to CTest:OnNotify()
}
when the client call the CTest->Add method, CTCPSocket will create a socket and listening, but the problem is: when there is a tcp connection event,how to pass the event to CTest:OnNotify() from CTCPSocket:notify()?
Thanks
Brygid
www.ecq.name
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to concatenate a variable of type 'unsigned long' to a variable of type 'char []'. How can this be done, since strcat() function takes 'char' arguments?
Thanks.
-Kranti
|
|
|
|
|
This is how we do it:
<font color=blue>#include</font> <iostream>
<font color=blue>#include</font> <sstream>
<font color=blue>int</font> main( )
{
<font color=blue>using namespace</font> std;
<font color=blue>long</font> lng = 2000;
stringstream strs;
strs<<"hello: "<<lng;
cout<<strs.str();
}
Nibu thomas
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
You can use sprintf().
check here ... [^]
Vini
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming that you by char[] really mean std::string (because you're a conscious[1] developer that avoids bald arrays and pointers if possible, right?  ), then do like this:
std::string ToString(unsigned long value)
{
char buffer[33];
return std::string(_ultoa(value, buffer, 10));
}
std::string concatenated(original.append(ToString(value)));
[1] Conscientious?
--
The Blog: Bits and Pieces
-- modified at 5:09 Monday 27th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Johann Gerell wrote: Assuming that you by char[] really mean std::string
You assume too much. That wasn't what he asked at all.
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Binns wrote: You assume too much.
That assumption was more of a veiled desire.
I could have replied: "If you're using char[] instead of std::string, then I'll be more than willing to answer your question if you restate it using a std::string instead."
But that would've been a bit too pompous, wouldn't it?
So, I stuck in my (maybe too disguised) point as I saw fit.
Ryan Binns wrote: That wasn't what he asked at all
Since when is there a one-to-one relationship between what one asks and what one means?
--
The Blog: Bits and Pieces
|
|
|
|
|
Johann Gerell wrote: That assumption was more of a veiled desire.
You're still assuming too much about his problem. Is he actually writing C++, or maintaining (or even writing) an ANSI C program? He hasn't told us. Your solution, while excellent for C++, is not very useful for a C program.
Ryan "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
|
|
|
|
|
Johann Gerell wrote: because you're a conscious developer
Well, I certainly hope he's conscious when he codes. Quite a feat to code while unconscious (although looking at some code makes one wonder ). Or did you mean conscientious?
You may be right
I may be crazy
But it just may be a lunatic you’re looking for
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
PJ Arends wrote: Or did you mean conscientious?
Check! (The reply is now somewhat updated...  )
--
The Blog: Bits and Pieces
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
