|
waldermort wrote:
I'm looking to create some sort of database.
Can you use Access?
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Can you use SQL . for any db you invariably need SQL
Once u know SQL its upto you to decide which db to go with depending on issues like distribution etc . There are embedded (text file) based databases available that are SQL compliant .
One good db is sqlite
http://www.sqlite.org/
Engineering is the effort !
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to make a string accept two words separated by a space?
So far, I have found that the string only accepts the first word and rejects any input after the space.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
show some code, because I don't understand.
if I do CString s( "Two Words" );, s contains 2 words.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: if I do CString s( "Two Words" );, s contains 2 words.
You better check that again. I only see one "Words" and one "Two." 
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Guys 
|
|
|
|
|
Bob X wrote: Is there any way to make a string accept two words separated by a space?
don't confuse NULL with Space... NULL terminate String and SPACE actually defined as Char(32)
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
|
|
|
|
|
actually, i wanted to send multibytes to the machine, like 02 00 02 00 20 42 51 08 to a function through which we could send this data to a machine, but i am able to send one byte at a time, how is it possible to send all the bytes at a time to a function?
shrin
|
|
|
|
|
Use the send() function on one end and recv() on the other.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
could you please give me detail idea on this..
|
|
|
|
|
See these:
recv[^]
send[^]
example[^]
sockets[^]
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Is this for win32 platform??
|
|
|
|
|
Check the bottom of the first two links. There it will show the requirements.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
|
when my list view control (report mode)
has too few items the vertical scrollbar
is disappearing. i looked through these
MSDN pages
List-View Window Styles
Extended List-View Styles
Window Styles
Extended Window Styles
but i didn't find a style helping me
to make the scrollbar stay.
i'm using plain winapi, no MFC, no WTL.
does anybody know how to solve this?
thanks in advance, sebastian
-------------------------------------------
My website: http://www.hartwork.org
-- modified at 13:09 Friday 24th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I looked into this myself last week and determined that the only way to do it is to set the owner drawn flag and start overriding things, it was too much bother so I gave up.
You'd think that with all the extended styles M$ have added they would have given a LVS_EX_DISABLENOSCROLL, like with standard list boxes.
|
|
|
|
|
SetScrollInfo doesn't seem to help either.
even GetScrollInfo fails.
please let me know if you find a way to make it work.
best regards, sebastian
-------------------------------------------
My website: http://www.hartwork.org
|
|
|
|
|
I still don't know how to achieve this.
Any help is very appreciated!
Thanks in advance, Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to be able to terminate a worker thread(for example, if it is in an endless loop)in such a way that the worker thread can clean up before terminating. I've thought that one way might be to cause an exception that the worker thread can catch. Is there a way for one thread to force an exception in another thread in the same process?
|
|
|
|
|
See here.
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the informtaion. Unfortunately, the programs that the worker threads are running are not mine, so I cannot make any modifications to them to check for thread status.
I'm wondering if it is possible to pause the worker thread, change the EIP register to point to my own code, and then resume the thread so that an exception is raised. I would like to do something that is reasonably standard so that I don't have to rewrite the code for 64 bit processors.
|
|
|
|
|
You shouldn't have to make any changes to the program that the secondary thread is spawning. The termination of a thread is a cooperative effort between the primary and secondary threads. If the secondary thread, in turn, needs to notify the program that it spawned, it can do so via SendMessage() or PostMessage().
"Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain
"There is no death, only a change of worlds." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
In a class I receive a pointer to a structure, I want to find out how many variables, has this structure and also what are their types or sizes!
Somehow silly, I know. just curious to know if it is possible. 
I receive the pointer as (void*), and need to place it's data in to 'a part of memory'with the same size as the structure!! then use each data separately!! ;P
example:
struct x {
int a;
int b;
}
<code>
struct x aVar;
read (&aVar);
...
...
</code>
void read(void* st)
{
int nVal_cnt = ? ;
int val1_size = ? ;
}
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
-- modified at 6:15 Saturday 25th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
i think you didn't really get the point with structures.
a struct is only a scheme of how will be filled the memory of an instance of this type...
a struct don't have a variable number of variables nor types...
they are fixed when you define this type.
and note that a speak of type !!
if you define this :
struct T {
int a;
int b;
};
then T is not a variable, but a type !!!!!!
after that only, you can use it tyo create variables :
T var;
var.a = 2;
var.b = 5;
do you get me ?
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc 2.24][3.0 soon...]
|
|
|
|
|
Modified
I think I was not able to say what I want correctly.
I understand the diffrence between a type and a variable.
I want to find out some information from a variable defined from a structure.
In my example I defined a type x, now consider the variable 'struct x aVar', now if I receive a pointer to this variable(&aVar), how can I find out some information about it? number of it's elements.
Is it clear or I failed again?;P
P.s.
In my old example: "void read(void* st)" is a function declaration receiving a pointer to a variable of the type struct x.
//This is not a signature
while (I'm_alive) {
printf("I Love Programming");
}
-- modified at 11:07 Friday 24th February, 2006
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
