Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Re: Code Police! Super Lloyd10-Oct-05 14:40 Super Lloyd 10-Oct-05 14:40  interesting insight... I might probably give it a new try.... Re: Code Police! Bob Stanneveld11-Oct-05 1:49 Bob Stanneveld 11-Oct-05 1:49  Super Lloyd wrote: Hey man, take it easy, there is nothing wrong using a tool to help one's own job I agree with that, but I don't wan't to use some tool that obstructs me from doing what I need to do. With some project, we agreed to use a naming convention. When we used together, we got numerous warning messages about the naming conventions. We turned that checking off and eventually we put the entire tool aside and started to review eachothers code. I'll be happy to use a tool which I can modify towards my needs. I also want to automate the reporting process. That would be a great tool for my needs. Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Re: Code Police! Daniel Turini12-Oct-05 12:05 Daniel Turini 12-Oct-05 12:05  Bob Stanneveld wrote: I'll be happy to use a tool which I can modify towards my needs. If you're working with .NET, you can use FxCop... I don't see dead pixels anymore... Yes, even I am blogging now! Re: Code Police! Bob Stanneveld13-Oct-05 2:41 Bob Stanneveld 13-Oct-05 2:41  Can you use it for C++ to? I work with both C# and C++. Behind every great black man...             ... is the police. - Conspiracy brother Blog[^] Pair Programming Marc Clifton10-Oct-05 2:34 Marc Clifton 10-Oct-05 2:34  Of course, the quality of the tool varies considerably. Marc My website Traceract Understanding Simple Data Binding Diary Of A CEO - Preface Re: Pair Programming Xiangyang Liu 刘向阳10-Oct-05 6:22 Xiangyang Liu 刘向阳 10-Oct-05 6:22  After years of programming, I no longer have simple bugs in my code. All I need is someone who can find the serious bugs for me. My articles and software tools Re: Pair Programming Paul Brower10-Oct-05 10:41 Paul Brower 10-Oct-05 10:41  Dude. You are funny Good old-fashiond code review Navin10-Oct-05 2:00 Navin 10-Oct-05 2:00  Hey, that's a code analysis tool, right? The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance. PC-Lint 8.00q Anna-Jayne Metcalfe10-Oct-05 0:22 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 10-Oct-05 0:22  Given that we're responsible for LintProject[^] and Visual Lint[^] it shouldn't be a surprise that we use PC-Lint pretty extensively. Although PC-Lint takes a little tuning to get optimum results from it, we've found it to be extremely effective at spotting little "party quirks" in our (and other people's!) code. In some cases we've actually been able to predict the conditions that would cause a significant (and unpleasant) change in behaviour of the target app, merely by looking at the context of a simple Lint message such as a variable scope warning. The testers didn't spot it until we told them how to reproduce it... Highly recommended. As an aside, a little while ago we seriously looked at using CLRxLint as well, but it seems to be a product whose development has stalled. Does anyone here have any experience of it? Anna Riverblade Ltd - Software Consultancy Services Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 24-Apr-24 18:21 Refresh ᐊ Prev123

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.