|
You can disable remote desktop and terminal services and all these things that allow any one to use your pc and log to it ,by setting the Services you want only , and also from the Local Security Policy ,they are really good and helpful ,i have modified them in my own system and it is doing good till now 
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if this is qualified as 'hacking' really. After all, he is the system admin.
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the a**hole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
My Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
joy007 wrote: Admistrator,in my office is very much willing to hack others system.I have Windows 2000 OS installed in my system.And I am sure that he does not know my login password so that he can hack my system through "Remote Desktop connection feature".Though some how he does.
In general concept, administator is the person that have the complete right to perform any action in the system. Whether, he or she has the full right and permission to access the system and data, they must have an ethical to access each user privacy. User privacy should be access only if there is a time for investigation on an serious issue. If you are a general user in the network, you have no opportunity to prevent any sensitive information to your administrator. Discuss this issue in the meeting to find out the solution.
joy007 wrote: Can u help giving ideas to protect my system
If the problem could not be solve, try to keep only data that relate to your work in the computer. Any personal data should be keep in the personal removable media (flash drive or external hard disk drive).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, how could we identify which Administrator account in windows 2000 is the built-in account or the account that have recently create??
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
I am not quite sure I understand the question but the built-in administrator account in Windows 2000 is called Administrator.
Any other account you create that you want to have admin privliges needs to be added to the administrators group.
|
|
|
|
|
dratcha wrote:
the built-in administrator account in Windows 2000 is called Administrator.
Yes, it is the default account that create automatically after windows 2000 have been setup. But remember that Administrator account could be renamed also. So my question is: how to identify which account that is the built in admin account (the account that create during setup) and which account is the admin account that create by the user (network administrator)??? If it is possible, could we identify this issue in MSDOS??
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
Try to delete it and if it's built-in account it will refuse the dleeting process.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is the risky method. If it is not the built-in account, it would gone. Whether you can create a new account with the same name and group membership, it each account has a unique id that would be load a difference profile.
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is the risky method ?
Ofcourse it's 
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for your help before. Now i could find the solution from here.[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I get really annoyed when I open an explorer window on a directory containing just a couple of files, and get a window that sprawls across half the desktop which I then have to resize manually. Is there an easy (or difficult) way of getting explorer to open directory views just big enough for the number of files in that directory?
Cheers,
Steve.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it is very difficult for you to do that. As far as I know, Microsoft did not give you the patch to solve this. Try to open and close it many time, to ensure that it is working or not...
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to do this without creating a logon script?
|
|
|
|
|
One more thing that you can do is creating home folder[^]. But before you do that, I recommend you to know about creating roaming user profile[^].
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
Why not a script?
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
If the physicists find a universal theory describing the laws of universe, I'm sure the a**hole constant will be an integral part of that theory.
My Blog[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I'm looking for a software that will show me which files on the server the users are accessing.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
You already have it. Go to Control Panel, Administrative Tools, Computer Management. Expand Shared Folders, then Open Files. From here you can see which files are being accessed.
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
JON10884 wrote:
...which files on the server the users are accessing
If you want to find only the current open file, Mike suggestion is the right answer. But if you want to know about the history of accessing the file from the user, you have know about configure auditing policies[^] and configuring and monitoring auditing article[^].
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
I need the c prog for First Come First Serve Process sceduling algo.
Can any one help?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I used windows xp sp2. I have the problem when I want to access the internet. I don't know why when I start the computer, the network card always disable, so I could not access to the internet. Whether I try to enable the network card but it still don't have an internet access. Does anybody have any suggestion about this issue???
A thousand mile of journey, begin with the first step.
APO-CEDC
Save Children Norway-Cambodia Office
|
|
|
|
|
Try this.
Remove the device from device manager.
Remove the device from the PC.
Restart the PC.
Put the Card back in the PC.
Have you added any new hardware?
|
|
|
|
|
jonathan15 wrote: Remove the device from device manager.
Remove the device from the PC.
Restart the PC.
Put the Card back in the PC.
This method is not working, because the driver still remain on the hard drive. When you plug it again it will install the driver automatically.
jonathan15 wrote: Have you added any new hardware?
No I havn't.
|
|
|
|
|
Can a DOS application work successfully on Win98SE?
Tell Me Why?
|
|
|
|
|
Neha.marwaha wrote:
Can a DOS application work successfully on Win98SE?
Tell Me Why?
Well, I've quite successfully run MicroCAD and Qedit in Win95, so it's not impossible. And MicroCAD's a pre-DPMI app, dating to the MS-DOS 3.3 days, so the latitude is quite wide.
I would say though, that the later, DPMI-aware stuff will run more successfully. (I don't claim to know anything about the AutoCAD memory manager, or any of the other memory managers and protected mode DOS extenders that came out around the late eighties and early nineties. My guess is that they don't break Win9x's DOSbox virtualization - reputedly one of Microsoft's hidden gems.)
Perhaps someone with more knowledge of the matter could enlighten us?
A mule at prayer! Ignore him; turn to me\ Until the gold contraption of our love\ Rattles its seven biscuit boxes, and the sea\ withdraws its combers from the rhubarb groves.
Titus Alone, by Mervyn Peake
|
|
|
|
|
MS went to great lengths to make the Win9x operating systems support as many DOS-based applications as possible. There was tremendous resistance to change (so what's new?) and they wanted wide, rapid acceptance of the new Windows. They did not maintain that compatibility priority with the WinNT/2K/XP series, but WinXP does have a compatibility mode that works well for some apps. If you had a DOS application that was happy running on Win98, XP can provide a sandbox for it to play happily in.
The Win9X systems were DOS-based, with a 32-bit shell running on top, so a lot of DOS apps worked great. Those which failed most often were the ones which relied upon direct control of low-level hardware interfaces. The answer, I guess, is "it depends..."
"If it's Snowbird season, why can't we shoot them?" - Overheard in a bar in Bullhead City
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
