|
Wordle 592 4/6
π¨β¬π©β¬β¬
β¬β¬π©β¬β¬
π©π©π©β¬π¨
π©π©π©π©π©
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 592 3/6
β¬β¬π©β¬β¬
β¬β¬π©π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
[ed: Links removed]
I have this odd obsession that I like to know who I am buying from especially on line things
So I observed this tag at the bottom of the company's web site Luxottica Group
By the way I have dealt with this company for at least 8 years always great service and price
I always figured it was some one who imported cheep reading glasses from who know where
here is the web site
OK now the interesting part who is Luxottica Group
As much as I despise Google you could never have done this years ago
OK some very smart Italian Guy (aren't they all)
That was nice but you know me I need to know how this company got involved with
the place that sells my $17.00 to #25.00 reading glasses HOLLY crap Conglomerate
Brands
Here is the killer in the past if you were not happy in 90 days you could return free of charge
did this once long time ago.
This time one pair were tight on my head so I requested to send them back
they said they do not do returns they just issue credit and request you donate
the glasses to a worthy cause How the hell do you do that ? Here is the answer!
Look at the prices of some of the other brands they sell $150.00 to $300.00
The cheep Readers come out of the same factory making the HIGH end glasses
I am beginning to sound like Paul Harvey "The Rest of the Story"
Well it is NOT a programming question. And I am not promoting anything just sharring! enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
It is one of the fastest growing company in manifacturing in Italy, there are reasons. As far as I know it's a pretty good workplace too.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
In Australia I pay $15 for reading glasses. In China they charged $200. 
I don't speak Idiot - please talk slowly and clearly
"I have sexdaily. I mean dyslexia. Fcuk!"
Driven to the arms of Heineken by the wife
|
|
|
|
|
That's an interesting point. It's similar with goods in Mexico because they don't have the kinds of trade deals the US and several other nations have. Buying a car in Mexico for example, or even shoes, is horrifically expensive.
I'm not sure, but unless all of that is eaten up in tariffs it may be that the seller pockets the difference? I really don't know how all that works.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
u can ditch the habit of buying glasses online and go out to a store and try it on be happy..
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers β progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I have a set of icons that are basically transparency maps generated from an SVG source, so you have little things like save icons and such.
Bear with me:
The transparency maps are such that each pixel is actually just an alpha value (at 8 bits it's 0 to 255 with 255 being fully opaque) - and then you apply a color to actually draw it on the screen. The transparency map works such that the icons wind up nicely crisp and anti-aliased against whatever background they are drawn against.
Here's my question: Can you think of reasonable use cases to adjust the transparency while drawing such that you can make the thing partially transparent while you draw it? Say you have a "new file" icon. Are there good reasons you can think of that it might need to be drawn partially see-through against a background?
Or is this just gold plating?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience, disabling a button with an icon, doesn't "disable" the icon; it still looks "active". In that case, I make the Icon faint enough (Opacity) to imply it's disabled.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. This is my quick-and-dirty means of displaying a WPF UserControl in a disabled state when the controls within it don't have the appearance I want. It's especially useful when the primary feature in the control is a bitmap.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Will the user be able turn off such a "feature"?
With eyesight like mine, any dynamic activity on the screen is an irritant.
|
|
|
|
|
That's kind of beyond the scope of this. This is just the library for the graphics.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that Microsoft, in their seemingly infinite stupidity, now has some windows that become transparent when they gain focus. Unlike (2000-era?) when they became transparent when they were in the background, and lost transparency upon focus. That was the only logical method, but some fool thought transparency is so cool that it should be in our faces. In other words, it is up to you. But I'm against transparency in the top-level window.
|
|
|
|
|
There are no windows on this. Just a little LCD display
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Are there good reasons you can think of that it might need to be drawn partially see-through against a background?
One of those things that really depends on the use case. Generally speaking, contrast is good from a usability standpoint. Not everyone has perfect version. It doesn't have to be a stark contrast, but using transparency to show a state change for instance is usually not a good thing as it's either too subtle or too much and you can't see the icon anyway. So, if it's something like a menu icon then it's a bad idea to use transparency effects.
That being said, if the purpose of the icon is to not have state or be interacted with like a menu the rules change. If it's larger than 32x32 then things change, etc. Say for instance you're making an On-Screen Display (OSD) application that would take up 25% of the screen and your icon is showing a logo, status effect, etc. In that case, transparency effects would be a necessity since so much of the screen real estate is now covered.
There's rarely one size that fits all in development.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 31-Jan-23 18:38pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Can you think of reasonable use cases to adjust the transparency
Maybee adjusting for themes?
|
|
|
|
|
Gold plating.
But I'm an old coot that still uses win7 defiantly.
|
|
|
|
|
He even argues that the moon is flat as well!
|
|
|
|
|
Mosdef useful. We often seen disabled text e.g. save as semitransparent (when there are no changes to save). So that is useful for icons as well.
"If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"
|
|
|
|
|
Since I asked the question I realized something.
You can already accomplish semi-transparent icons by drawing them with a forecolor pixel that has an alpha channel.
However, that didn't work as it should have due to an implementation issue in my code.
So I fixed that, and answered the question at the same time.
A separate parameter for an alpha factor is not necessary after all. 
Too bad I didn't think of that until later that night.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
If this is to show the icon disabled, whats the difference between grayed out and say, 50% transparency? I'm thinking work/code wise. Feels like they would be similar, but if you are going for disabled then grayed out is the standard and easier to see for old eyes.
Are there other uses for it other than showing disabled?
Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.
|
|
|
|
|
I was sent this: A flat earther explains ...[^]
What can I say? Please, don facepalm protection before watching. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So nice of you to become a parent to these orphaned threads. 
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: So nice of you to become a parent to these orphaned threads
Let me see if i can also be given the guardian medal.
|
|
|
|
|
It does seem to be becoming a habit, doesn't it?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
