|
Rage wrote: what would be your best SciFi book ?
I like the one's from Steve Alten. I've read all but the (government) conspiracy ones.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
As have already been said, there is a lot of good SciFi out there.
- Pohl: The heechees series, Merchant wars...
- Heinlein: The moon is a bad mistress, Friday...
- Crichton: Jurasic parc, State of fear
- Asimov: Foundation serie
- Herbert: Dune serie (although some are not that good)
- Schätzing: Limit
- I don't know how it is called in english but the plot is that every human being that reached more than 5 years old is resurrected all at once in a world were basic needs are automatically covered by some allien technology. 5 or 6 books
-...
-...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Riverworld is what you are looking for: Riverworld - Wikipedia[^] - I mentioned it above, good stuff!
Just watch out when searching for P.J.Farmer books at work: some of his stuff was pr0n with a SF / Fantasy setting - "Image of the Beast" and "Blown" for example ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: - Heinlein: The moon is a bad harsh mistress,
FTFY
That is where Mycroft comes from 
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the correction... I didn't search the proper name, just translated it on the fly.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a golden rule about SciFi - if the core story could be written for any other genre, then it ain't SciFi.
This puts Carl Sagan's 'Contact' at the top of a pretty short list.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: if the core story could be written for any other genre, then it ain't SciFi.
I am puzzled by your logic: No great love story can be SF. No critical assessment of anarchism, or any other political / social structure, can be SF. No mystery can be SF. If story is bases on philosophical or moral issues, it cant' be SF. ... So, what is left for SF? No nothing. Pure drivel - that is what it sounds like to me.
I strongly disagree. I have read loads of SF books of great value as love stories, as political / social comment and criticism, as great mysteries, as philosophical or moral issues.
I haven't read 'Contact', but my first guess (from the summary in Wikipedia) is that I would see a lot of elements in it belonging in other genres, once you look behind that hardcore SF setting. The setting is required, if you want to direct a spotlight from that direction onto political and social issues, but as a mere storyteller's tool - the real story is not the high-tech spaceships and signals from remote galaxies.
A book can be read in many ways. Same with movies: Lots of people may reject a movie on the grounds that "I know how it ends" (in IMDB comments, and many other places, you are expected to clearly mark your comment as a 'spoiler' if it reveals anything about the ending) - I often enjoy watching it for the second and third time because I know how it ends, and I want to see how all the small strands of the story leads up to that ending. Strangely enough, I have never heard any music lover rejecting, say, a symphony because "I know how it ends"
So you could probably read a novel such as Contact with little or no concern from what I consider the real, underlaying story, about social and political ideas and conflicts. The technology part, the action part, the 'science' part, are the only essential aspects.
Some people watch movies that way: If you ask what the movie was about, they immediately start telling about the fighting, the battles, the crazy car driving, ... When I stop them, and ask which conflicts it was about, they go on naming the actors on this side and on that side. But... Which ideas or ideals where driving the two sides? Then we are down to the philosopical level of "the good against the bad". (If you know the ending, you certainly know which side is the good!)
I had a similar experience with an SF book: I gave a copy of one really great SF novel, Daniel Keyes: Flowers for Algernon, to a coworker. The story has deeply influenced me, and several of my friends have been so deeply moved that they almost with tears in their eyes return the book with a quiet 'Thanks for letting me read it'. But this coworker of mine, highly intellectual who reads loads of books, returned to tell that the novel is just soooo nineteen-sixties, and went on to point out the outdated approach to psychological issues, and the outdated way of building up the conflicts. She rather preferred the modern writing style of [this and that] author ... Like a chemical analysis, determining the nutritional content without being the least concerned about the taste.
I guess 'Flowers for Algernon' is way outside your SF definition; it can be viewed as so many different kinds of story. Like my coworker who only relates to the new, 'modern' books, where you can easily find a bunch of comments and critics in current media. So if you pick up the novel, feel free to read it as something else than SF. You should - it is certainly worth reading!
|
|
|
|
|
It's a Friday evening here, and I am about to shut down and pour myself a gin and tonic, but your reply deserves the courtesy of a response.
My position is simple - if the main story line is concerned with love, grief, power struggles, conquest, deceit, mass psychology or any other human or societal circumstances and emotions, why complicate it with science fiction, unless that science fiction is absolutely essential to the plot? Perhaps I have read some bad science fiction, but a lot of what I have read concerns themes that could just as easily, and what is more important, more believably, be set in a purely earth-bound narrative.
For me, if a science fiction story leaves me with a sense of wonderment about the universe we live in, then I feel it has truly succeeded - like how I felt when I walked out of the cinema after first seeing '2001: A Space Odyssey'.
Maybe I just have too much difficulty in suspending belief.
|
|
|
|
|
I was tempted to answer "Sure." to OP. 
I share your thoughts about 2001.
In other registers, same feelings about Lost in translation and Dancer in the Dark.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: how I felt when I walked out of the cinema after first seeing '2001: A Space Odyssey'.
You mean 'well rested' after sleeping for 2 hours - right?
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
You just got awarded the >>1024 answer of the month award. Congratulations !
|
|
|
|
|
I am sorry - I wasn't aware that the Lounge was restricted to oneliners. I'll honor that rule from now on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ursula Le Guin's The Dispossessed immediately occurred to me upon reading your third sentence. Wonderful work by a wonderful author.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Chris C-B wrote: if the core story could be written for any other genre, then it ain't SciFi.
I guess it therefore depends upon what you consider the "core story" to be. I've found most if not all science fiction to be retellings of classic themes in a science fiction setting.
By that reasoning, your list would not just be short - it would be empty.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
No, not empty! To start, the two I have already mentioned match my criterion - 'Contact' and '2001', although '2001' was a film before it was a book. There many examples, like the original H. G. Wells 'War of the Worlds', 'The Mote in God's Eye', 'The Tommyknockers' and even TV dramas like 'Quatermass and the pit'.
The one thing I will concede is that the majority have one thing in common - earth science is pretty much 'present day', with the science fiction bit coming from an alien civilization.
|
|
|
|
|
I only have one sci-fi book, Polaris, by Jack McDevitt. The main character gets involved in a 60 year old mystery about a crew disappearing from an interstellar yacht. It was one of those random grab books I picked up, and I enjoyed the read.
Otherwise, my bookshelves are lined with Fantasy novels; Forgotten Realms and The Wheel of Time sort of stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Kris Lantz wrote: Otherwise, my bookshelves are lined with Fantasy novels; Forgotten Realms and The Wheel of Time sort of stuff
they get a couple of shelves at my place too.
- Tolkien: Middle Earth
- Weiss & Hackmann: Dragonlance serie && The Death Gate Cycle
- Many others.... more Dragonlance (I think I have almost the whole set)
- Miguel de Castro: El pais inerme (not sure if it has been translated to english, but if yes... a nice one too)
-
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have to explore the Dragonlance books once I finish up the WoT. I'm ready to read something else. 
|
|
|
|
|
It is a bit like with star wars... first the main trilogy, then the prequels, then the continuation of the first plot, then parallel stories...
I recommend you to start by the main plot and then the continuation of the main plot. They are the best 6 books, then some of the prequels (I specially liked the ones by Flint the dwarf and Tas the kender, I found them really funny).
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Weiss & Hickmann: Dragonlance serie && The Death Gate Cycle
I loved SciFi books as a kid. These were every bit as good as anything I read back then! Read them standing up in the bookstore! Only Ender's Game comes to mind as being equal or better. But haven't read much since then.
|
|
|
|
|
Oooo! Add in Robert L. Forward to that list - "Dragon's Egg" and "Flight of the Dragonfly" / "Rocheworld" are well worth a read.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Oooo indeed. On my list too! 
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Too many to count. I have about 500 songs my ten top favourite songs, same with books.
Day of the Triffids - John Wyndham (plus all his other books)
Nightfall - Isaac Asimov (Ok everything by Asimov)
Dune - Frank Herbert
Martian Cornicles - Ray Bradbury.
Riverworld - Philip Jose Farmer
Anything by Larry Niven.
Everything by Terry Pratchett (not strictly sci-fi though)
Loved Brave New World (& the old movie + new TV series).
Then there's Arthur C. Clarke, Harry Harrison, Eric Frank Russel, Robert Sheckley to name a few.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
How could I forget Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars & Gold Coast books.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
