The Lounge - CodeProject

First Prev Next

Re: WSO CCC OTD 2020-12-04 - SOLVED

yacCarsten4-Dec-20 1:19

yacCarsten

4-Dec-20 1:19

As a totally useless fact, they have to call themselves Hungry Jack's here (name was already trademarked by a takeaway food shop in Adelaide).

// TODO: Insert something here

Some shameless spam

Jörgen Andersson3-Dec-20 8:40

Jörgen Andersson

3-Dec-20 8:40

Or just spreading some awareness for a good sake: https://www.projectnorthmoor.org/[^]
Support the campaign to save J.R.R. Tolkien’s home and establish a literary centre.

Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger

Re: Some shameless spam

DRHuff3-Dec-20 9:32

DRHuff

3-Dec-20 9:32

I was expecting a hole in the ground. Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat

If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

Re: Some shameless spam

dandy723-Dec-20 9:32

dandy72

3-Dec-20 9:32

I'm gonna be "that guy":

Christopher Tolkien has more money than his father ever had. His estate got a fortune from the movies alone.

I don't see why he needs my money to "save" a house that's bigger than anything I would ever be able to afford in my lifetime.

Re: Some shameless spam

Jörgen Andersson3-Dec-20 9:37

Jörgen Andersson

3-Dec-20 9:37

Is he involved?

Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger

Re: Some shameless spam

dandy723-Dec-20 9:42

dandy72

3-Dec-20 9:42

Seeing that he died last January (I just looked it up), I'd say no.

But if his estate isn't involved (he's still got grandchildren)...and they're not...then you have to ask yourself why. $omeone is $melling an opportunity.

Re: Some shameless spam

Forogar 3-Dec-20 9:40

Forogar

3-Dec-20 9:40

He is not involved in this project. Nor is the Tolkien Estate.

- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

Re: Some shameless spam

Sander Rossel3-Dec-20 9:47

Sander Rossel

3-Dec-20 9:47

I was going to be "that guy", but you beat me to it Smile | :)

Next to Tolkien's family, who's always been very protective of his work, if I'm not mistaken, the actors alone could buy the estate ten times over and not even miss the money.

I also really don't understand why they're asking for our money Unsure | :~

Best,
Sander

Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook)
Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook)
Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure
arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

Re: Some shameless spam

Forogar 3-Dec-20 9:51

Forogar

3-Dec-20 9:51

I'm buying a mug anyway.

- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.

Re: Some shameless spam

Nelek3-Dec-20 10:14

Nelek

3-Dec-20 10:14

� Forogar � wrote:
I'm buying a mug anyway.

Me too.

And I offered my help with text translation to spanish.
Not donating though.

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Re: Some shameless spam

F-ES Sitecore4-Dec-20 0:35

F-ES Sitecore

4-Dec-20 0:35

Meh, the works of Tolkien are both limited and literarily poor. 99% of positive sentiment toward his work is really just nostalgia for the movies of Peter Jackson.

Re: Some shameless spam

GuyThiebaut4-Dec-20 2:35

GuyThiebaut

4-Dec-20 2:35

Being one of those who has read the three books in the trilogy, plus The Hobbit, I thought they were much better than the film.
Although it's a long ponderous read, but yes I would not class it as literature like the works of say Dickens, Elliot or a more modern writers like Kazuo Ishiguro.

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

― Christopher Hitchens

Re: Some shameless spam

Nelek4-Dec-20 2:49

Nelek

4-Dec-20 2:49

GuyThiebaut wrote:
I thought they were much better than the film.

99% of the books are better than the films.

M.D.V.

Re: Some shameless spam

GuyThiebaut4-Dec-20 3:04

GuyThiebaut

4-Dec-20 3:04

Although I thought that two of Kazuo Ishiguro's books that were made into films were fairly well accomplished.

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

― Christopher Hitchens

Re: Some shameless spam

dandy724-Dec-20 9:19

dandy72

4-Dec-20 9:19

FWIW, I saw the movies long before I read the books. I did enjoy the books thoroughly, but I don't think there's any way I would've read them had it not been for the movies.

And I fully realize making such a statement is horrifying to the Tolkien purists. I'll remain polite and just call them...a special bunch.

Re: Some shameless spam

C^hris L^osinger4-Dec-20 3:29

C^hris L^osinger

4-Dec-20 3:29

F-ES Sitecore wrote:
99% of positive sentiment toward his work is really just nostalgia for the movies of Peter Jackson.

maybe if you were born in 1990, that could be true.

turns out, though, that the books are older than Jackson himself. and generations of people had already read and enjoyed them long before Jackson got anywhere near making those movies.

Re: Some shameless spam

F-ES Sitecore4-Dec-20 4:21

F-ES Sitecore

4-Dec-20 4:21

Before the movies a small number of people enjoyed the books for the books. Since the movies a large number of people now like the work, and of that new body of people 99% really only like the movies.

Re: Some shameless spam

C^hris L^osinger4-Dec-20 4:26

C^hris L^osinger

4-Dec-20 4:26

it was a NYT bestseller in 1966, 8 weeks at #1.

Re: Some shameless spam

F-ES Sitecore4-Dec-20 4:44

F-ES Sitecore

4-Dec-20 4:44

And how many people have seen the movies vs read the book? A magnitude of hundreds of thousands I'd guess.

Re: Some shameless spam

C^hris L^osinger4-Dec-20 5:54

C^hris L^osinger

4-Dec-20 5:54

fine. you're right. the world started in 2003.

Re: Some shameless spam

F-ES Sitecore4-Dec-20 6:06

F-ES Sitecore

4-Dec-20 6:06

I didn't say that.

Number of people who enjoy the books before the movies: 1,000,000
Number of people who say they enjoy the books after the movies: 100,000,000

99% of people who say they like the books are really just fans of the movies.

Re: Some shameless spam

C^hris L^osinger4-Dec-20 6:38

C^hris L^osinger

4-Dec-20 6:38

F-ES Sitecore wrote:
99% of people who say they like the books are really just fans of the movies.

the books have sold more than 150,000,000 copies, over 65 years.

Re: Some shameless spam

Nelek4-Dec-20 14:31

Nelek

4-Dec-20 14:31

And that only sells...

Add the people who have borrowed it, taken it from the library...

M.D.V.

Re: Some shameless spam

F-ES Sitecore5-Dec-20 0:20

F-ES Sitecore

5-Dec-20 0:20

You really think more people have read the books than seen the movie? You're sticking to that are you?

Re: Some shameless spam

C^hris L^osinger5-Dec-20 2:42

C^hris L^osinger

5-Dec-20 2:42

No, I don't think that.

Try using less straw.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 24-Apr-24 7:51

Refresh

ᐊ Prev 1...3388 3389 3390 339133923393 3394 3395 3396 3397 Next ᐅ

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

Welcome to the Lounge

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”