|
The only problem I have with running everything on Win10 (Enterprise, because that's how I roll) is Sonar grabs exclusive control of the sound. Is that how ASIO works? No idea, don't care. A minor inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's how ASIO works. It's the price you pay for low latency. Some DAWs, like FL Studio (my DAW of choice) have the option of either ASIO or the DirectSound driver. With DirectSound it doesn't lock out your sound for other apps. It's not as low latency as ASIO technically, but with a modern computer it almost doesn't matter anymore. Bottom line is you can use DirectSound if your DAW will let you and you'll probably be fine.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Registry bloat is the most likely culprit, but series of service packs and patches can't help.
Guess who's the biggest culprit regarding registry? 
honey the codewitch wrote: What I wouldn't give for a nice, stable, OS without all the garbage, that just worked, and was close looped dev enough that it all worked together consistently, and supported my hardware.
Windows 7 used to be that, until they started adding telemetry spyware via automatic (optional) updates, and then forcing it on every machine with cumulative updates. While the cumulative updates did help regarding the registry (it still grew, but not as fast as it used to), I hate MS for rolling optional telemetry updates into these. I got so tired of removing that crap over and over again that i finally decided to set my boxes to manual update only. Unfortunately, this only delayed the actual problem, because there was no way to only apply security updates without installing previous cumulative updates 
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
You need to use PCI pass-through, I think that would fix your midi problem, unless your hardware is not Linux compatible. The whole USB controller needs to be passed to the VM. I got a PCI USB card for that purpose in my rig.
I am running Xubuntu host with Xubuntu guest (safe web browsing) and Windows 10 guest (gaming only). The three are isolated from each other (AMD cpu, memory, most hardware, only the keyboard, mouse, and monitor are shared) by the kernel. The Win 10 VM has it's own AMD GPU / Samsung NVME for gaming.
My setup has been very stable, more so than most Win 10 installs. I think the key is being very picky on the hardware choices. I built this rig over a year ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Geez. Solve a software problem with hardware. I already did that once with this install. meh.
I'll consider it, but i sure don't want an extra USB controller
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a different take on how to solve the untrustworthy-OS problem. Simply forget about the OS. Assume that it's buggy, inconvenient, always changing, insecure, and steals your private data. That said, write a software framework that ensures that not only are security and privacy protected, but also ownership of each and any data component you deem as being your virtual property. Put this framework code in all or any app you want (of course I am ignoring for discussions sake all the problems of how you do this). That way, you have the same app interfaces you are used to and you have never given your data away to clouds or OSes. You will always own your virtual stuff even though TCP/IP can take them anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
small comfort when it nukes my GRUB install and i can't boot anymore, but i hear you
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to have to join the "Windows 10 ain't all that bad" brigade despite my inherent dislike for it.
Some thoughts:
I look after quite a few family & friends computers (at least 20 at a rough count), all Win 10 now except for 1 Mac. The only ones where Win 10 has borked, slowed down etc., have been the laptops with mechanical drives. Replacing with an SSD seems to have cured all of them.
My 3 home PCs are all home built with decent hardware (Asus, Crucial, Samsung/Intel SSD, WD etc.) - none of them have ever gone wrong (from an OS point of view); over the last 5 years I have had 1 PSU burn out (it had previously been used for a bitcoin hashing rig, so no surprise there) and 1 4TB SATA disk fail (part of a RAID 6 array) - never have I lost any data nor had a computer fail to start.
I also have linux running on 7 Raspberry Pis and in a remote VM that runs my web site. I think that they have all fallen over at some point, usually during an update. The VM one failed miserably doing that and I had to wipe it and restart from scratch. Even worse VMWare ESXi on the remote server later fell over too during an update (from 5 to 6 IIRC) - that was fun.
Finally, as for trying to use VMs for anything other than simple workstation tasks is a hiding to nowt (as they say up North), all the VM editors maintain that you can get seamless direct access to hardware.. it's a lie! You might be lucky and get USB3 working for slightly faster data transfers than USB2 but forget about DACs, video capture etc. Similarly my DVB-S2 card has remained steadfastly unrecognised by 33 different products. I also have some audio software that won't run on Win10 - I ended up putting it on an old Win 7 laptop rather than struggling with a VM.
OK, so where does that get us? Grin a bear it with Win10, strip out all the excess crud and run it on good hardware.
Sorry for going on so much.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you looked at FreeBSD? It's much more 'designed' than Linux. When Windows 10 came out I decided that I needed to look for some alternatives. I played with FreeBSD for about a year and really liked it. The problem is that they're behind Linux when it comes to newer hardware.
I currently dual boot Windows 10 and Devuan Linux but have been looking at replacing Linux with FreeBSD. The main reason I didn't use FreeBSD to start was the hassle of trying to get dual boot to work properly. Was never able to get it to work well back then. Hopefully, things are a little easier these days.
|
|
|
|
|
Oooh, I didn't consider FreeBSD. Not sure why I didn't think of it myself. I'll strongly consider it.
The main problem i have with these (linux, freebsd) is they don't have the software i use
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
For me, 85%-90% of the software I use is available under Linux, Windows 10 and FreeBSD (jEdit, Firefox, Thunderbird, Libre Office, g++, etc). It's really only Games and photo editing (Affinity Photo) that keep Windows 10 on my machine.
|
|
|
|
|
We'll trap you in your homes which we fill with brainwashing broadcasts in order to keep you outraged (to keep you engaged) but otherwise fearful and complacent (to keep you useful).
Enjoy! 
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
People were already fleeing the propaganda in droves, so I'm not even sure that having a captive audience will help.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think so either but it isn't for lack of trying. James Woods (who I normally avoid but had a point this time) posted an image on twitter (i can't find it now) of a reporter in a hazmat suit being filmed by their cameraman - who was in plainclothes. They sure made sure they suited up for the camera though. It's ridiculous. BE AFRAID. ANYTHING AS LONG AS YOU PAY ATTENTION TO ME. They'll cause lasting social damage they'll never have to answer for. All because the industry is dying. It's sad.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Media companies have gained a 15% boost in pageviews due to this media frenzy.
However: regardless of the hype, the misinformation, the scare mongering and everything else that's going on, there is a real, on-the-ground issue with our hospital systems being overloaded. I have friends and family working in hospitals and they're very, very stressed and overworked already (and that 'overwork' is at this point often dealing with freaked out, uncooperative and sometimes angry patients. Crazy.)
The % of cases that require treatment may turn out to be really, really low. The absolute numbers, though, are proving to be enough that some hospitals, already over capacity, are now simply unable to cope.
That's what we need to be careful with. If I get hit by a car, or my Dad has a heart attack, or a new baby is in trouble, we need the hospitals to still be able to care for them.
Once we have herd immunity this will be (it seems) a total non-issue.
But yeah: a little less crazy and a little more "shrug OK, let's give it a few weeks then move on" would be much appreciated out there. I wonder, though, how you actually get a calm sensible message to a generation brought up on instant gratification and screamy reality TV. If it's not more shocking than the episode that's just aired then who will pay attention? If the headline is not as alarming as the news item next to it who will click it?
I wish people were more logical. Unfortunately that would make them far less interesting.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well said! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
| +1
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
I just hate it when someone sane say something reasonable.
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
keep at it.
Social distance the crap out of covid-19.
Science the sh*t out of covid-19.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Once we have herd immunity this will be (it seems) a total non-issue.
So we should just make sure that the virus is spread to everybody as soon as possible, and those who survive will be immune, right?
I wonder how many lives that would cost in total.
|
|
|
|
|
That was the result of the study of the UK college thingy : millions.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So we should just make sure that the virus is spread to everybody as soon as possible
NO! As slow as possible, otherwise the hospitals will be overwhelmed with those with severe symptoms.
It is only question of time that nearly everybody (*1)) will face the virus but again, this should happen slowly as possible.
[Edit]
*1) unless a vaccine is available in a short time
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: Quote: So we should just make sure that the virus is spread to everybody as soon as possible
NO! As slow as possible,
So, social distancing and lockdown?
OK, got it.
Now we have to sell it to the public.
I know! We'll put it to them rationally and logically!
It works with elections and referenda, it's bound to work with this, too!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Member 7989122 wrote: So we should just make sure that the virus is spread to everybody as soon as possible, and those who survive will be immune, right?
Not sure how you got from "Once we have herd immunity this will be (it seems) a total non-issue" to "we should make sure we get everyone sick as fast as possible".
No, not even close.
The issue is we can't overload the hospitals. We either need herd immunity to naturally slow infections, quarantine to slow the spread, or treatment that means people avoid a hospital trip. We don't have option A, we're trying option B, and we're working our collective pharmaceutical bottoms off on option C.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is: How do you build that "herd immunity"? Currently, we know of one way: To catch the corona virus.
The problem is that I frequently encounter arguments about "herd immunity" as a pancea to handling corona. If we only had herd immunity, corona wouldn't be any danger at all, see? So, let's solve the problem as fast as we can!
There was a strong element of sarcasm in my post. I certainly do not want to make everybody sick and let the survivors take over. Actually, I am afraid that the ditty might get that idea, and start makin people believe in it. After all, most of those that would die are elderly people who do not contribute significantly to the US econonomy, so once we get through and the strong, young survivors come back, we have cut a lot of non-profitable expenses!
Maybe we will not see that kind of arguments. Still, I am scared that he migth pick up this "herd immunity" as something that he migth build some speech on. Even if he doesn't explicitly line out the socially negative consequences, he might focus on how it would strengthen US economy to have population with a "herd immunity", without saying a word about the sacrifices in human life. Ignoring that he is certainly in the risk groups himself.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
