|
Attack the parts list singer? (7)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
just to get it outside Wales...
BOM parts list (bill of materials)
BARD singer / poet
attack - def.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
And you are up tomorrow! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought up a good one over the weekend, and I can actually remember it! 
The timing tomorrow may be a bit off. I *should* be at my destination by then, but given it's 500 miles away and involves several modes of transport to get there....
Prompted by last week's comment from @megaadam, maybe we "regulars" should consider some kind of time constraint on ourselves.
For example, @OriginalGriff and @petepjksolutionscom should not be able to answer for one hour; I'd happily take a half hour hit, and maybe the immediately preceding setter should too. What say, peoples? Anyone got a better idea for spreading the joy?
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I'm fine with that.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
We ( me and OG ) did do that for a while but it didn't make much difference
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Given how rare it is for me (and maybe others) to solve the CCC, I don't think it would make a lot of difference.
|
|
|
|
|
agree.
>64
Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok with me to 
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Just did a search for "javascript force to a number", since I was having trouble converting an enum to a number. The third result was to an article titled "The White House Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment: Update on Implementation of Approved Actions". It didn't contain the work 'javascript.' God, Google is starting to really f***ing suck!
I did solve the issue (a syntax error in my calling code), but my eyes still hurt, and I expect they will for a while!!!
 (but no smile - a huge frown!)
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it was a sponsored link.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the word "force" made Google think it as some kind of military force.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm willing to bet the page contained the word javascript somewhere.
might have been "text/javascript" though. 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. As well as "You have JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use this feature." in a class.  Since I haven't disabled Javascript for the site, it didn't affect the view. 
|
|
|
|
|
Weird I just tried and didn't get that
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps you are signed into Google, and it is personalizing your search for you? I almost always do searches from an unsigned in browser. Before about 3 to 6 months ago, Verbatim search was _really_ good. Now it, and all other forms, seem to suck.
- edit: tried it in Bing and it was FAR better. I thought I'd never say that!
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: edit: tried it in Bing and it was FAR better. I thought I'd never say that!
Seriously, I've never found Bing to be all that terrible. I'd go as far as saying it's as good as Google's ever been, but at least they haven't yet followed Google's current trend to make everything suck.
|
|
|
|
|
I find for most technical/code searches, bing is far superior, often giving me the code snippet from the most relevant stackoverflow post in an easy to copy view. But I am a .net programmer, so most of my searches are C# on Windows based. Plus, they've continued their bribe program and I accumulate points I can eventually trade in for Amazon gift cards. I HAVE turned off the chat functionality, though. It's not as accurate as the standard search.
|
|
|
|
|
LeahAtWork wrote: I find for most technical/code searches
True, that's mostly what I search for generally (which is why ads annoy me to no end but that's another story).
Yet it used to be that searching for some API documentation yielded better results on Google than on Bing (or MS's own API page). I can't say what it's like these days on Google, it's been so long I've explicitly gone there to search for anything...
|
|
|
|
|
I find the opposite.
Google is better than Bing, well for some searches anyway.
Neither of them are really any good in general anymore these days though, that I do agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Me not either. But this may differ locally. (Germany)
Getting W3Schools, geeksforgeeks and plenty of other dev stuff no army stuff luckily.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what happen when getting money from sponsors is more important than giving quality results for the users.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, $74 billion in revenue is nothing in the eyes of greed. Must sacrifice the quality we've had till now! 
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you know that greed is an exponential relationship to the amount of what you have?
Once managers get used to that level of life, they need the next step, and hence the next bonus or record revenue.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried that and the first result was
7 ways to convert a String to Number in JavaScript
1. Using parseInt() parseInt() parses a string and returns a whole number. ...
2. Using Number() Number() can be used to convert JavaScript variables to numbers. ...
3. Using Unary Operator (+) ...
4. Using parseFloat() ...
5. Using Math.floor() ...
6. Multiply with number. ...
7. Double tilde (~~) Operator.
All the rest were links to answers posted at other dev sites for that exact question.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
