|
|
C# is not far behind. 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it's no longer a teenager, that's for sure!
C# is even allowed to drink booze in the USA ... which would explain some of the additions they have made in recent years, come to think about it! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
It's been over a decade and a half I've touched anything C++.
If that's where it is today, this just about convinced me I should try very, very hard to never go back.
|
|
|
|
|
Top uni briefly lied about being constrained (7)
|
|
|
|
|
Nice! 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have it Greg
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I got hooked on Camb or Ox
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I was originally going to have "US uni..." but thought that narrowed it down too much... 
|
|
|
|
|
Love the fox and hedgehog analogy<a href="https://gokutoapk.top/">,</a>, It beautifully captures the essence of software development. You've got the foxes who are jacks of all trades, adept at tackling various challenges but not necessarily experts in one. Then you have the hedgehogs, who may focus on mastering one particular technology or approach. Both have their merits in a robust services core. It's a balancing act between versatility and specialization, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Solution please. I swear one day I'll understand a clue if I keep reading these long enough.
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.
|
|
|
|
|
Top uni briefly lied about being constrained (7)
Definition: being constrained
Word play:
Top uni: MIT (briefly - use abbreviation or initials)
Lied: LI ED (about - The letters of lied wrap MIT)
Solution:LIMITED
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking “top uniform” like a General or Admiral” which both happen to be 7 letters. I had “limited” as part of clue to be transformed, but did not notice that is was also 7!
It seems like “briefly” could be left off since “uni” is already a shortened hint?
These clues always point out how ambiguous language is.
is there a LLM for solving CCC?
|
|
|
|
|
src\main.cpp:580:21: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1358
Lovely. Given this code compiles fine on IoT, but not under PIO's windows x86 platform package it seems they are using an old compiler, which would also explain why -std=gnu++17 doesn't seem to compile C++17 code, forcing me to revert to 14.
I'm not sure what I can do about it, since I don't control PIO's packages, but it does seem curious to me that this would have such an old compiler. Maybe it has to do with their MiniGW package or whatever it's called.
I *was* putting a neat little package together to prototype IoT and embedded applications on my PC without having to upload them every time i make a change.
Seems I'll have to go about it a different way.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
True story: Back in the Olde Dayes, I worked on a project on a microVAX using one of the very first Ada compilers for VAX/VMS. We were actually a beta site for the compiler company. Compiling a package containing generics would crash VMS, something to that point I thought was flatly impossible.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try turning the compiler’s knobs? Like turning off all optimizations?
I have a VAX/VMS story where their C compiler optimizer generated incorrect code for an Intro to C class. I did the rest of my labs in the Unix lab after that.
VMS was very late to the C world as it was a PITA to use C for system programming. Every C string had to be converted to a “string descriptor” to call a system function.
|
|
|
|
|
And those string descriptors, along with the fact that every single system call validates arguments are why VMS has never been breached.
|
|
|
|
|
Rust may get us there again. And I say that without being a fan of it.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, it was breached.
I had a copy of X.exe that would allow any regular user to elevate their privileges. (Only used for academic purposes!)
They had subversions just like every other system for a reason.
4.0.5 etc (I think that is version that blocked the X exploit)
|
|
|
|
|
I ended up moving away from PlatformIO so I could use a newer version of GCC and it buffed right out!
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 817 4/6
🟨⬛🟨🟨⬛
🟨⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 817 6/6*
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟨🟨⬜🟩
⬜🟨🟨🟨🟩
🟨⬜🟨🟨🟩
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
