|
I read the title and instantly envisioned the post to say: "...and it cuts up the bodies really nice!". So, glad it was not that.
I guess I need to lay off the Sopranos re-runs.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying - real hard - to avoid getting blood on it.
Rusts the chain, apparently.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I just use a bigger hammer. Works for me.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure you've seen my profile picture...
|
|
|
|
|
That's ... disturbing on so many levels ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coming from you, and with a subject line like this, I was expecting some one-liner like "...and it's cutting edge".
|
|
|
|
|
"and it's lots of cutting edges" doesn't work so well ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
'Friendly' is the difference between "Do It Right" engineers and "Do It Cheap/Fast/Dirty" engineers wage monkeys.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
A diabolical act! Heap sort goes badly wrong! (11)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Your clues are utter pandemonium this week 
|
|
|
|
|
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A disaster at the singularity... 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I've got another one for tomorrow, if that's what you are asking ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Yay! You are up tomorrow. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
POH obviously doesn't want to set them
"We can't stop here - this is bat country" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had Chrome open with 12 tabs. Open up Task Manager and take a peek and there are SEVENTY NINE chrome.exe processes!
W T ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ?!
Oh, and before you say "extensions!", I only use one. WebEx, and I didn't even use it today.
|
|
|
|
|
12 Tabs, 1 Frame and 66 data slurpers? 
Firefox right now... one tab, 6 processes.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox. 23 tabs, 12 processes.
|
|
|
|
|
9 tabs, 25 processes.
12 extensions loaded, and I believe each of those gets a process even if they aren't being used at the moment.
Most of the processes are sitting there with 0% CPU, Disk, and network; and memory below 30MB, so I don;t worry about 'em.
It makes sense to put each extension is it's own process: if it crashes it doesn't take the rest down with it.
[edit]
It's changed: 7 tabs, 13 processes. Maybe each extension doesn't get a process ...
[/edit]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 30-Jun-20 1:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
Vivaldi: 10 tabs, 17 foreground processes, 5 background + 1 update notifier: total about 1.2GB.
|
|
|
|
|
The worst is when Chrome starts it's software reporter process 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
