|
It's actually a joke about the buffoons in the Welsh (so called) government.
|
|
|
|
|
Twinings and Whittard's enacted an embargo on Russian Caravan.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
The Russians have responded with sanctions on Chicken Kievs.
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
War is a stupid and tragic waste of life. I doubt that it something to joke about.
I have no doubt this will escalate into WWIII before it is over.
As far as Joe "Neville Chamberlain" Biden goes, "those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it".
Biden is the worst President ever! Putin is out of his mind. The citizens of Ukraine have been well and truly screwed by the U.S and Nato.
Seriously worried in NOLA
|
|
|
|
|
Please someone adds an Option Explicit to Python.
The fact that something like this is even conceivable, let alone valid, is atrocious:
class Empty:
pass
Empty.completelyNewAttribute = "seriously?"
obj = Empty()
obj.randomTypo = 10
Every new programmer makes fun of C++ for being unnecessarily hard to use but I think that a language like Python, with all the possible ways it enables programmers to shoot themselves, is 10 times harder than C++.
And yes, my opinion that Python is VB with different clothes is only becoming stronger. Ugh.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
when I see code statements like goto and option explicit , I run in the opposite direction.
den2k88 wrote: with all the possible ways it enables programmers to shoot themselves
I honestly think that is the objective (thinning the herd).
den2k88 wrote: Every new programmer makes fun of C++
What is funny about this is that most of the software these "new programmers" run, was written partly or mostly in C++. Inconceivable!
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: I honestly think that is the objective (thinning the herd).
I like the way you think. I work in embedded so the my particular herd is already very thin
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Goto is an issue. Option Explicit is the programmer telling you how they're handling variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would you rather see an option explicit or wonder what the result of
var sum = "6" + 6
is?
Option explicit prevents the confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You do understand that Python was named in honour of "Monty Python's Flying Circus" (where chaos and madness were the norm)?
|
|
|
|
|
Albatross!
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I keep telling people, especially when I see the logo of 2 intertwined snakes.
What's faster: the speed of light or the speed of dark?
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: I think that a language like Python...is 10 times harder than C++. I tried it for a few weeks but found it extremely hard to understand. I'll stick with C++ and Java.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
There are some slightly weird things you need to get your head round. Once you 'get' those things it really is quite an easy language to use.
|
|
|
|
|
It's quirky. As I'm more and more convinced, it's VisualBasic all over again (they do share birth year, by the way). It's useful to automate random stuff, it's single thread, it has a strong support for binary calling and a nice quick graphic interface whose logic is 1:1 that of Windows.
In my company we will probably start using Python for automated testing and data analysis so we will need to learn it; I do find myself in need of a quick GUI to link to my Serial / MODBUS / LIN libraries to prod and test our products; we also have a self improvement program that makes us choose courses to follow during the year.
Given all of the above, the decent multiplatformity (is that even a word?) of Python and its ubiquity it makes for me a good choice.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Once you realize that objects are just dictionaries, and everything is an object, it all makes a lot more sense, but one does have to understand that there is a difference between an object's dictionary and an object's instance dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the big gotcha indeed, it takes a while. Also scopes are dictionaries, everything is public, every line of code is executed, every method is static... and an object.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Remember when people complained about C, so someone came up with lint?
Guess what?
pylint.org ๐
|
|
|
|
|
Lint... the only tool that can take a perfectly readable piece of code and make a total mess out of it. I wonder what damages it can do with Python.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think what you're looking for are __slots__
class Empty:
__slots__ = ('completelyNewAttribute',)
Empty.completelyNewAttribute = "seriously?"
obj = Empty()
obj.randomTypo = 10
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
No! It is about the right tool for the job.I love C++, Java, SQL and Python but all of them require different ways of thinking and is for solving different problems. If you approach Python like C++ it will frustrate you to no end.
However, for the right problem Python is an absolute blast to use! If you need to get something done quickly, with lots of uncertainty and you have the opportunity to iterate Python is amazing. I love it when you can work with an interface/dataset which you only need a small portion of and you don't have to define and type the stuff you are not interested (which happens a LOT in the data world). Of course lots of people hate that uncertainty and would love for everything they work with to be 100% defined, but defining something 100% of which you only use 10% is literally a waste of time.
Of course that depends on context. If you deal with transactional banking you want everything defined 100% and I will stick to Java/C++. If you are trying to extract value from an enterprise data lake quickly where you don't know all the data, will have no opportunity to know all the data then using Python for ML and other purposes is awesome.
|
|
|
|