|
In what respect? Russian and Chinese players invariably use mod menus as do quite a lot of Germans. And I see no problem with blocking anyone from a given country being able to connect to my computer through the game, do you? It’s not as if it will affect their game as all that will happen is I won’t be in the same server as them.
modified 6-Sep-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because it would prevent being able to discuss spay/neutering when the cat's around. You need a secret language for that. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
He does still wash his bits, then stare at me thoughtfully for quite a long while from time to time - and he's 11 now. Long memories, cats. They plan ahead as well ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: How to Tell If Your Cat Is Plotting to Kill You[^]
"It's a cat. Of course it is."
Duh. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learning to Play with a Lion's Testicles
While they're still attached? 😶
Paul Sanders.
If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter - Blaise Pascal.
Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
You want to remove them? Help yourself - I'll be in that big, strong anti-p*ss*d-off-lion cage right over there with the YouTube stream ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the first book. Also one more Cat book by Oatmeal guy(which you mentioned in other message)
|
|
|
|
|
Funnily enough... I was in bookstore yesterday and noticed two peculiar offerings.
The first is a book on how to make money via cryptocurrency... Which of course the author must not be very good at or he wouldn't need to try to sell books to Dummies.
The second is a (hard cover) book on living waste-free...
|
|
|
|
|
"Never take investment advice from someone who has to work for a living." --Nassim Nicholas Taleb
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: Which of course the author must not be very good at or he wouldn't need to try to sell books to Dummies.
Reminds me of recent former Dogecoin millionaires
|
|
|
|
|
Any book is different and unique (if we are not talking about copies of the same book of course)
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure the Meow book isn't a little over your intellectual level?  
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
 As I mentioned in my post, I'm into more books. Google searches given me random items like those. I came across around 50 titles & couldn't remember all those. My intentional search was about things like Experimental Fiction, Epistolary, Other writing forms, etc., But I got these titles unexpectedly.
Now I remember one more This Guy Became a 'Best-Selling Author' in Just 5 Minutes[^]
But I found more real books apart from these masterpieces.
|
|
|
|
|
I build weird devices like this at 3am[^]
Because I only sleep 4 hours at a stretch. Maybe some of the older folks here have the same issue, as I hear it's common in one's august years, so maybe some can relate. Lots of empty space to fill in the wee hours.
I figure eventually my setup will look something like this[^] which is life goals, actually.
I don't really think of myself as a hacker (regardless of hat color - hardware or software) but maybe the shoe fits given my extracurricular extravocational activities? I may have to reassess.
I started building digital circuits at 7 after my grandfather bought me one of those radio shack 200-in-one kits. They were simple, but my interest started very young. I didn't start coding until a year later or so. I only got into coding because as a kid I didn't have a revenue stream for electronics hobbies and my family hated me taking things apart all the time, but we had a computer. Given the right circumstances, I probably would have been a fabricator actually. My interests are varied.
But hardware has changed me. Getting back into the metal of things has even changed why I code.
Before it was always about doing stuff I couldn't do - leveling up. Now it's about exploring how everything works. Again. Like I'm 7.
I want to disassemble the whole world and see how it works.
And then make it better.
Why do you do what you do? What drives you?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Started out as a child and a 200 in one kit too!
|
|
|
|
|
I had a similar electronics kit, but was seduced by the Dark Side (software) when I was about 11.
My ambition is slightly different. I want to do a code review of the Universe's O/S, and finally fix all that pesky technical debt! 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I have no hands-on hardware experience. My understanding of hardware is conceptual, and I have no interest in going beyond that.
I enjoy the sense of creation that software brings. For most of my career, I worked on servers that were five- or six- nines. That is, no more than 30 seconds or a few minutes downtime per year. We had technology that was far ahead of most of the industry, including live patching in the early 80s and a distributed software library in the early 90s. Our products were built using a proprietary language and operating system. I was surprised to learn that much of the computing industry seemed unaware of the techniques that we used and often did things in inefficient and counterproductive ways. So once I retired, I set out to make those techniques available in a non-proprietary language, on commercially available operating systems.
I have no desire to toy with the universe. It's hard enough to get my own code right. There are already far too many world improvers messing things up, and I don't have, to borrow from Hayek, their fatal conceit.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: I have no desire to toy with the universe.
I can fantasize about tinkering with the Universe's O/S only because I know that I'll never get to do so.
I've been following your articles about robust software development, and have learnt quite a few things from them, some of which I wish I had known 25-30 years ago.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
If the Simulation Hypothesis turns out to be correct, maybe we'll get to tinker with it!
Bostrom's argument[^] for it is a good one, but the hardware would likely need the power of a Dyson sphere. But give the hardware boys enough time and they'll do it. But the software? I think that's the best argument against it. It would be down for "routine maintenance" every weekend, though maybe we wouldn't know it.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: If the Simulation Hypothesis turns out to be correct, maybe we'll get to tinker with it!
That depends; are we running as an ordinary user, or as "root"?
I find the Simulation Hypothesis to be unconvincing. By the same token, we could be part of a Multiverse (see the Many Worlds interpretation of Quantum Mechanics). There is no way to tell the difference between these two scenarios. In either case, the only Universe that we can experience is the one we inhabit; by definition, all others, even if they exist, cannot interact with ours even in principle, therefore we may as well treat them as non-existent.
If another Universe can interact with ours, all it means is that the Universe is larger than we expected, and has a non-trivial topology. This would require a major rewrite of Physics, but would not change the basic idea that there is only one Universe.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
