|
On my Moto G5s when I open the text history I can pinch to zoom the text in/out.
|
|
|
|
|
Brian L Hughes wrote: No way am I getting bi-focals just for my dumb phone.
I have vari-focal and the glasses still fly off and on my face all day long.
One advantage though is that it gives my nose a break.
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you could use bifocals or progressives, even if you're a little "young" for them as I am.
I have progressives because I work with electronics regularly, and I'd have to take my glasses off and on to see the silkscreens or solder.
They are a lifesaver. Maybe consider it.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
I got my eyes lasered 18 years ago to leave glasses for long dinstance behind me (miopy)
I am now getting glasses back for near and PC distance. I need a "work place" glasses but I am taking a progressive"room" glasses with 3 zones.
Bottom is for near, center from 50 cm to 2-3 meters and top is for up to 12 meters. (To avoid having to take them out when someone gets into the room, or looking to things in the other corner).
Outdoors, driving and so on... I don't need them
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to middle age.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
That's definitely one thing the iPhone does well: it will offer to auto-fill the code when it receives the text message. No need to copy and paste, or try to remember the code.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Just got a request to update my Tiny_TTF library in LVGL to support 9.0 features in the dev branch.
Alright, so I set up a build and test environment.
Whoops, they've completely broken the API. I can't even get anything to compile. The docs don't reflect the latest changes.
Why even ask me to do this if you're not prepared? Am I to the learn the API telepathically?
I don't have time for this.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Well.. you can always reject the PR! ^_^
And better yet, message them?!
|
|
|
|
|
I've messaged them. I'm waiting on a response. It's just frustrating that they'd ask for something they're totally not prepared for. I guess maybe I expect a lot? Oh well. I'm already over it. It was just irritating in the moment.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Well.. a good PR is supposed to compile fine!
But not all PRs are good PR!
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't the PR that didn't compile, but my attempt at using it.
It's a library. But they've changed the API and haven't documented the changes yet so I can't use it.
The previous way of using it does not compile.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
just be honest and state the request to upgrade will be delayed.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
I did.
It was just a lil rant. I was over it quickly. Writing it out helped.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of the Java 1 to Java 2 update, sometime in 1997/98. From what I remember, Java 2 made sure that most of Java 1 code did not work. That was the time I learnt a new word - 'deprecated'. There was so much frustration in my office at that time.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Am I to the learn the API telepathically? Well you are a witch, aren't you?
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: The docs don't reflect the latest changes.
keep that in mind with your own docs.
honey the codewitch wrote: Am I to the learn the API telepathically?
I have created many interfaces to non-trivial systems. I have just gotten used to it.
I remember one case where the certification problem for a credit card processor was settled between two of their techs (not me) by one of them declaring that the account was theirs so I would just need to follow what they said and not the other tech.
|
|
|
|
|
Fired up my "TV provider" ... see what's on the cooking channel ... then see in "recently added": John Wick: Chapter 4 (170 min). See you later ...
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Gerry Schmitz wrote: John Wick: Chapter 4 (170 min). See you later ... I saw it yesterday...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Was a good flick. Keanu still has it.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look for "The Continental" series as well, just started.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't find John Wick 2 to be that interesting. Some dude going around killing people without much of a story. No way I would watch any more. I'm surprised so many people find it good. Glad you liked it, but not for me.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
If you watch Wick 2 without the context of Wick 1, it is what it is. I "liked" that it included the host of Iron Chef as a super villian ... or was that Wick 3?
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the first one and then the second one. The first one was unique if not slightly over the top. By the time I was most of the way through the second one, it felt like college kids trying to consume more cans of beer than the next. John Wick 2 had the feel of: lets double the body count to make up for a weak script. I figured the third and fourth would be more of the same and decided to spend my time elsewhere.
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
i was disappointed . same ol' same ol' w/ several illogical plot elements i do not at this moment recall . two nice little plot elements i did enjoy though i also do not at this moment recall except the surprise at the final duel .
|
|
|
|
|
It was a "demonstration". It included visuals and stunts not seen in previous versions or "other" movies. More "characters". "Liking" or not liking are acts of the will.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|