|
Salvatore Terress wrote: I do not know how to describe "hardware platform".
He means, "what are you running it on? A PC, Raspberry Pi, etc.".
If, by any chance, it's a Raspberry PI, check dmesg to make sure that you have neither low voltage nor high temperature conditions.
Also check your SDR USB dongle for overheating.
So old that I did my first coding in octal via switches on a DEC PDP 8
|
|
|
|
|
I found - years ago - Fedora to be the best for me...
I occasionally using Qt, and it works for me, however the IDE comes with it is far from being good... but it may be a global issues and not specific to me...
"If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization." ― Gerald Weinberg
|
|
|
|
|
You may like to try the suggestion at Ubuntu 22.04 too eager[^]. However, more importantly, you really need to find out what is taking so long to process.
|
|
|
|
|
Amazon.de now offers The Who - Who's Next | Life House [SDE with 10 CD + 1 BD] for 133 EUR !
https://www.amazon.de/Whos-Next-10CD-BluRay-Who/dp/B0CB91MQBY/ref=sr_1_1?crid=ENWZY4BROF10&keywords=the+who+who%27s+next+super+deluxe&qid=1703352171&sprefix=%2Caps%2C109&sr=8-1[^]
Within germany inc. shipping.
I don't know how much shipping within the EU costs and for US or UK you have to check for shipping costs and probably taxes.
Many say Who's Next is one of the greatest Rock Albums of all times and I can say they are right!
I use Amazon Music Unlimited for streaming and this SDE (Super Deluxe Edition) is very good.
The original album, the Pete Townshend Life House demos (CD2 and 3) and Sessions, Outtakes and Singles (CD 4, 5 and 6) are great!
The live concerts are not so important for me:
CD 7 + 8 live at the Young Vic [Theatre] 1971
CD 9 + 10 Live At The The Civic Auditorium, San Francisco, USA / 1971
Perhaps someone is interested and can save some money.
EDIT:
For shipping costs and/or taxes please contact Amazon customer service!
|
|
|
|
|
Well it amused me, anyway[^]
Told you I'd be back, but I'll be doing it slowly - I have a backlog of several months worth of sleep to catch up on, and my concentration is a bit short as a result.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
"Ho, ho". And good to hear from you Paul; let's hope the mending process continues.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just contemplating emailing you - we've missed you.
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Take it easy, Paul. "Time takes time."
But it is good to hear from you again.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Good to hear from you!
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good to hear from you again and best Christmas wishes to you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back, at your own pace.
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
That was a good re-entrance!
|
|
|
|
|
Amused me too! Welcome back.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome, Paul. Sleep away, friend.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Ho, Ho, Ho.
Happy whatever you celebrate.
>64
There is never enough time to do it right, but there is enough time to do it over.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome back, and it's very good to see you!
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
It's good to see you back!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Sidetracking - you trailer:
Wouldn't real freedom be to say that two plus two make five? That would include a lot of religious freedom as well!
|
|
|
|
|
You are assuming that there is no objective reality, and that therefore reality is whatever the Powers That Be claim that it is.
You may recall that in George Orwell's Nineteen Hundred and Eighty Four, Winston Smith worked in the Ministry of Truth, whose only reason for existence was to "correct" data so that it appeared that the Party was always right.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I am suggesting that a fair share of those who demand absolute religious freedom are demanding the freedom of irrationality. Two plus two make five is an explicit statement of irrationalism.
Winston argued in favor of rational truth. So you can say he was strongly and expressively against any sort of irrational religious argumentation.
¨
By stating that freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes five, you tell that you are open to accept even irrational, religious claims. Maybe you personally do not subscribe to the idea that two plus two makes five, yet you support the right of religious people to hold their irrational beliefs - maybe not of the arithmetic kind, but in the same class of irrationality. Two plus two make five symbolizes the irrationality.
If I state that I do respect your freedom to proclaim the irrationality of two plus two making five, it also says that I respect your freedom to make whatever irrational religious statement that you would like to make.
(Obviously, I reserve the right to argue against the irrationalities, even though I grant you the right to declare them.)
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
It's completely wrong to have this discussion here
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a better place to suggest, please speak up!
(But honestly: I suspect that what you really are saying is: That kind of discussions shouldn't be raised anywhere. There should be no questioning at all. The socalled "truth" should be be accepted with no objections or critical remarks at all. Neither in this forum nor anywhere else.
Religious freedom means the freedom to say that two plus two makes five.
|
|
|
|
|
The basic premise of science is not that "God does not exist", but that "There is no experiment that can be made to detect the presence or absence of God". Therefore, the rational thinking that you refer to is orthogonal to the beliefs of religion.
It is easy to demonstrate that "two plus two equal five" leads to inconsistencies and contradictions. It is less easy to do so in the case of religious beliefs, therefore the state should keep well away from the latter.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|